####################################################### # 12 YEAR Ayelet DAILY-RASHI-YOMI CYCLE # # JUN 5 th, 2006 # # Rashis 3573-3572 Of 7700 (46.3%) # # # # VISIT THE RASHI YOMI ARCHIVES # # ----------------------------- # # http://www.RashiYomi.Com/thismon.htm # # # # Reprinted with permission from Rashi-is-Simple, # # (c) 1999-2004, RashiYomi Inc., Dr Hendel President # # Permission to reprint with this header PROVIDED # # it is not printed for profit # # # # WARNING: READ with COURIER 10 (Fixed width) FONTS# # # ####################################################### |
#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc. 2005, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#
VERSE: Nu26-54a
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04 | ||
SUCCINCT SUMMARY: ----------------- One of Rashis 10 major goals is to illustrate complex geometric designs or algebraic complications. This is called the Rashi method of SPREADSHEETS, since SPREADSHEETS are one method of clarifying a complex relationship. The SPREADSHEET method can refer to any illustration of a verse that clarifies it. EXAMPLE Nu26-54a ---------------- Nu26-53:56 states ------------------------------ * To these the land shall be divided for an inheritance according to the number of names. * To the more numerous you shall give a larger inheritance, and to the fewer you shall give a smaller inheritance; * to every one shall his inheritance be given according to those who were counted by him. ------------------------------ Rashi clarifies the division procedure with principles * PER PERSON vs PER TRIBE: E.g. a tribe with twice as many people gets twice as many land (Per person) * PER DOLLAR vs PER AREA: Tribes of equal numbers received plots of land of equal value even though the areas differed (PER DOLLAR) LIST690a below presents many Rashis based on SPREADSHEETS. SUCCINCT SUMMARY ---------------- One of Rashis 10 main goals is the explanation of meaning the same way a dictionary explains meaning. We call this the Rashi method of WORD MEANING. Rashi had 10 vehicles by which to explain words. Rashi frequently explains not, word meaning, but rather phrase meaning. That is each particular word in the phrase may have a known meaning but the collection of words together form a NEW IDIOMATIC MEANING. We call this the NEW MEANING or the IDIOM SUBMETHOD. EXAMPLE Nu26-54a ---------------- The verse Nu26-55 states --------------------------------------- The land of Israel is divided according to the MOUTH OF THE LOTTERY --------------------------------------- Rashi explains MOUTH OF LOTTERY as an IDIOM meaning a lottery box which is almost totally covered except for a small mouth---hence the selector cannot even see the back of cards when they reach in. Consequently the MOUTH LOTTERY is very secure and fair. LIST854x below presents other examples of Biblical idioms. | ||
ITEM | DETAIL | |
RASHI RULE CLASS: | SPREADSHEETS | |
RASHI SUBRULE CLASS | ALGEBRA | |
RASHI WORKBOOK PRINCIPLE | #30 | |
SEE BELOW | LIST690a | |
List of Rashis using | Spreadsheets/Algebra | |
--------------------- | -------------------------------------- | |
RASHI RULE CLASS: | WORD MEANINGS | |
RASHI SUBRULE CLASS | NEW MEANINGS | |
RASHI WORKBOOK PRINCIPLE | #7 | |
SEE BELOW | LIST854x | |
List of | Biblical idioms(eg FROM DAYS DAYS=YEARLY) |
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04 | ||
List of Rashis using Spreadsheets/Algebra | ||
VERSE | Item Spreadsheet is used for | |
nu26-54a.htm | Israel divided a)Per PERSON b) Per DOLLAR of land | |
nu21-13b.htm | Illustrate complex geometric border design | |
nu13-22b.htm | Israel is superior of all lands | |
gn49-26d.htm | your fathers blessings greater than my fathers | |
dt21-17a.htm | How to give 1st-born double *1 | |
ex38-24b.htm | Computation of relative value of Biblical currency | |
nu03-39b.htm | Accounting of Levite children | |
nu31-26a.htm | Division of booty in war | |
gn05-32b.htm | Computation of relative ages of Noachs children | |
gn25-20a.htm | Proof that Rivkah was 15 when she married Isaac | |
|
||
*1 Many people are familiar with the concept of the FORMULA PLUG IN. That is a problem is solved by a formula which you plug into. But some problems intrinsically cannot (initally) be solved by a formula. Instead you have to formulate the problem algebraically and solve;only then do you have the formula. In other words these problems are solved by the EQUATION vs the FORMULA Thus the statement that the eldest gets double suggests the following model. - Suppose the are B brothers - Suppose 1 of them is eldest - The Fathers total assets are T (Total) - Let A be the amount each brother inherits We have no formula for A - Then each of the B-1 brothers obtains A - The eldest obtains double, 2A. - Together this exhausts the Fathers estate, T Hence we have (B-1)A + 2A = (B+1)A = T This gives rise to the formula A = T / (B+1) An example is a father with 100,000 and 4 children - T=100,000 - B=4 - So each child take T/(B+1) = 100000/5 = 20,000 - Eldest takes 2*20000=40000 - Other 3 take 20000 - Total distribution =3*20000+40000=100000 See Rambam Inheritance Chapter 2 |