####################################################### # 12 YEAR Ayelet DAILY-RASHI-YOMI CYCLE # # December 26th 2002 # # Rashis 1801-1803 Of 7800 (23.0%) # # # # VISIT THE RASHI YOMI ARCHIVES # # ----------------------------- # # http://www.RashiYomi.Com/calendar.htm # # # # Reprinted with permission from Rashi-is-Simple, # # (c) 1999-2002, RashiYomi Inc., Dr Hendel President # # Permission to reprint with this header PROVIDED # # it is not printed for profit # # # # WARNING: READ with COURIER 10 (Fixed width) FONTS# # # ####################################################### |
(C) Dr Hendel, Nov-02 | ||
VERSE: Ex02-05c COMMENT: Welcome to the New Year and a new -------- Compact form. Hope you like it QUESTION (Yitz Lowenstein-Baltimore) -------- You claim that Rashi only gives simple meaning. But Ex02-05c states PHAROHS DAUGHTER SENT HER MAID TO GET THE CHILD while Rashi cites a talmudic translation PHAROHS DAUGHTER STRETCHED HER HAND TO TAKE THE CHILD. Rashi then refutes this talmudic interpretation. Doesnt this prove that the Talmudic interpretation is not the simple meaning. ANSWER ------ Good question. Actually however the Talmudic interpretation IS the simple meaning. Here is how Rashi interprets the verse - PHAROHS DAUGHTERS MAIDS - WERE WALKING BY THE NILE - PHAROHS DAUGHTER SAW THE ARK WITH THE BABY - AND SHE SENT HER [PERSONAL] MAID TO TAKE IT Notice how the first part of the verse speaks about PHAROHS MAIDS (plural) while the 2nd part of the verse speaks about her MAID (Singular). So Rashi-is-Simple: The MAID she sent was her personal maid that she trusted with risky tasks (The King had forbidden saving Jewish babies and hence only a special maid could be used). Chazal use the term HAND MAID to indicate PERSONAL MAID*1 | ||
ITEM | DETAIL | |
RASHI RULE CLASS: | GRAMMAR | |
RASHI SUBRULE CLASS: | PLURAL SINGULAR | |
RASHI WORKBOOK PRINCIPLE | #9 | |
SEE BELOW | LIST003a: | |
A list of inferences | from contrasting pluralit |
(C) Dr Hendel, Nov-02 | ||
VERSE: Lv05-13a QUESTION: --------- There are 3 sin offerings: For RICH people, POOR people and VERY POOR people. How does Rashi infer that if you eg set aside $100 for a RICH offering and then become POOR that you are allowed to use only say $30 of the $100 to purchase a POOR offering. But in the reverse case where you set aside $30 for a POOR offering and then became RICH then you must add $70 ANSWER ------ We use Rashi Workbook Principle #10: ALIGNMENT of verses can show 2 cases. Here are the verses: -Lv04-35(RICH) He will atone IN ADDITION to his [money for a] sin offering -Lv05-06(POOR) He will atone FROM his [money for a] sin offering -Lv05-13(VERY POOR) He will atone FROM his [money for a] sin offering. The CAPPED aligned phrases clearly show 2 cases: Sometimes he ADDS to set aside money & sometimes he only takes FROM the set aside money. | ||
ITEM | DETAIL | |
RASHI RULE CLASS: | ALIGNMENT | |
RASHI SUBRULE CLASS: | 2 CASES | |
RASHI WORKBOOK PRINCIPLE | #10 | |
SEE BELOW | LIST002a: | |
A list of inferences | From ALIGNED PHRASES |
(C) Dr Hendel, Nov-02 | ||||
Alignment of verses on sin offerings See Posting Lv05-13a above The contrasting phrases affect payments when a persons economic status changes | ||||
VERSE | SIN OFFERING OF | BRINGS | VERSE USES PHRASE | |
Lv04-35 | RICH | Animal | BESIDES what he set | |
Lv05-06 | Poor | Birds | FROM what he set | |
Lv05-10 | Poor | Birds | FROM what he set | |
Lv05-13 | Very Poor | Flour | BESIDES what he set |
(C) Dr Hendel, Nov-02 | |
Inferences based on plural-singular contrast See posting Ex02-05c Pharohs daughter had many maidS but she only sent one maid(singular) to get the baby on the Nile | |
Ex02-05c One maid sent Others werent trustworth | |
Ex19-02b Nation camped In a unified fashion*3 | |
Gn14-14c They SplitS Army divide/conquer*4 | |
Gn49-04 fathers bedS Reuven swapped beds*5 | |
|
|
*1 So: Many maids went down to the river But PHarohs daughter only trusted one maid to get the baby *2 If you steal once you pay a fifth fine If you steal the SAME object many times then you pay many fifths (Plural) *3 The entire nation(plural) campled(singluar) They acted as a unified whole *4 First the army went out as a unit Then they split into groups(Hence the singular plural contrast) *5 Cf Gn35-22a which accuses Reuven of incest Gn49-04 clarifies this: Reuven would swap bedspreads when his father wanted to sleep with Bilhah Reuven would swap her bedspread with Leah(Leah was a full wife while Bilhah was a maid...hence Reuven felt it was legit to intefer with his fathers private life) |