####################################################### # 12 YEAR Ayelet DAILY-RASHI-YOMI CYCLE # # February 2nd, 2003 # # Rashis 1863-1865 Of 7800 (23.9%) # # # # VISIT THE RASHI YOMI ARCHIVES # # ----------------------------- # # http://www.RashiYomi.Com/calendar.htm # # # # Reprinted with permission from Rashi-is-Simple, # # (c) 1999-2002, RashiYomi Inc., Dr Hendel President # # Permission to reprint with this header PROVIDED # # it is not printed for profit # # # # WARNING: READ with COURIER 10 (Fixed width) FONTS# # # ####################################################### |
VERSE: Ex21-02a
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-03 | ||
VERY BRIEF SUMMARY ------------------ One of Rashis 6 main methods is the powerful ALIGNMENT method in which similar phrases, verses, or chapters are aligned. The resulting minor differences imply nuances, inuendoes and cases. The Parshah of Mishpatim is particularly rich in CHAPTER ALIGNMENTS--it is these comparisons of whole chapters (vs internal analysis of phrases) that gives MISHPATIM its charateristics Talmudic flavor EXAMPLE 1-Ex21-18a ------------------ There are 4 Biblical chapters on TORTS. This gives rise to 5 types of tort damages 1) PERMANANT ORGAN DAMAGE 2) DISABILITY 3) MEDICAL 4) PAIN 5) EMBARASSMENT EXAMPLE 2-Ex21-02a ------------------ There are 3-5 Biblical chapters on Slaves. We see emerge 3 types of slaves 1) Non Jewish 2) Jewish-Voluntarily sold (Because of poverty) 3) Jewish-Sold by court because of debt EXAMPLE 3-Ex21-13c ------------------ Several contrasting verses exist on Gods providence 1) God is seen as WANTING REPENTANCE 2) God is seen as WANTING VENGENANCE The resolution of these 2 contradictory statements leads to further insights on Gods providence | ||
ITEM | DETAIL | |
RASHI RULE CLASS: | ALIGNMENT | |
RASHI SUBRULE CLASS: | TWO CASES | |
RASHI WORKBOOK PRINCIPLE | #10 | |
SEE BELOW | LIST310a | |
A list of verses | dealing with torts | |
------------------------ | ------------------------ | |
SEE BELOW | LIST310a | |
A list of verses | dealing with torts | |
------------------------ | ------------------------ | |
SEE BELOW | LIST311a | |
A list of verses | dealing with slaves | |
------------------------ | ------------------------ | |
SEE BELOW | LIST312a | |
A list of verses | about Gods justice |
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-03 | |||||||
The Torah mentions torts in 4 contexts. This gives rise to the 5 tort categories - PERMANANT ORGAN DAMAGES - PAIN etc. Note how each context defines an obvious class For example making someone bedridden typically involves disability and medical. | |||||||
VERSE | TORT | PERMANANT | DISABILITY | MEDICAL | PAIN | EMBARASS | |
Ex21-18a | Bedridden | X | X | ||||
Ex21-24 | Eye,Tooth | X | |||||
Dt25-12 | Testicles | X | |||||
Dt23-29 | Rape | X |
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-03 | ||||
The Torah mentions torts in 4 contexts. This gives rise to the 5 tort categories - PERMANANT ORGAN DAMAGES - PAIN etc. Note how each context defines an obvious class For example making someone bedridden typically involves disability and medical. | ||||
VERSE | PHRASE1 | PHRASE2 | PHRASE3 | |
Ex21-02a | Sold Hebrew slave | work 6 years | and free on 7th | |
Dt15-12 | Sold Hebrew brothers | work 6 years | and free on 7th | |
Differs | *1 | *2 | *3 | |
|
||||
*1 Since the tails of the verses are the same we infer that both verses deal with the same case--that is we infer that HEBREW SLAVE means a JEW (HEBREW) sold as a slave*10 *2 These phrases are the same | ||||
|
||||
*10 Rashi points out that the Hebrew construction is --- HEBREW SLAVE --- ambiguous and can equally mean - (ADJECTIVE) A SLAVE that is a JEW (HEbrew) - (POSSESSIVE) A SLAVE owned by a Hebrew Hence this alignment decides which of these competing grammatical usages apply. Rashi presents some additional Talmudic logic on what I would have thought without this verse. Such explorations are useful but must be preceded by an understanding of what the verse teaches. Similar grammatical ambiguities exist elsewhere in Tnach (eg does Ex20-02 refer to gODS of OTHER PEOPLE (POSSESSIVE) or OTHER GODS (ADJECTIVE) Our goal in this email list is to present Rashis main point. Rashis main point in this posting is the alignment which illumines the ambiguous grammatical phrase HEBREW SLAVE |
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-03 | ||
The Torah in various places speaks about Gods justice The Torah frequently presents God as merciful But sometimes the Torah presents God as seeking vengenance! This typically occurs by irreversible and reprehensible crimes.*10 *11 | ||
VERSE | TEXT OF VERSE | |
Ex21-13c | God PLOTTED that he should kill*1 | |
1S24-13 | Evil only happens to the wicked | |
Lv20-05 | I will place My face against him*1 | |
-------- | ---------------------------------------------- | |
Ez18-32 | I dont want the death of the wicked;but repent | |
|
||
*1 Rashi gives the example of person A who intentionally killed A' while person B accidentally killed B'. These crimes are irreversible. Hence if B and A meet, B may accidentally kill A since - A deserves to die for his intentional killing - B deserves to go into exile for his accident killing. Similarly the Child-offerer (Lv20-05) causes the child irreversible damage and therefore God places his face against him. However ordinary sinners are encouraged to repent | ||
|
||
*10 We can also approach these Rashis using the famous Rabbi Ishmael method of contradictory verses. In fact the method of contradictory verses can be approached in 3 ways - thru contradiction - thru the method of OTHER VERSES - thru the method of ALIGNMENT *11 Rashi only brings one of the verses in this list However as is our usual custom I bring in other similar verses |