#######################################################
#       12 YEAR Ayelet DAILY-RASHI-YOMI CYCLE         #
#                    Sept 8th 2003                    #
#          Rashis 2193-2200 Of 7700 (28.6%)           #
#                                                     #
#           VISIT THE RASHI YOMI ARCHIVES             #
#           -----------------------------             #
#       http://www.RashiYomi.Com/calendar.htm         #
#                                                     #
#    Reprinted with permission from Rashi-is-Simple,  #
#  (c) 1999-2002, RashiYomi Inc., Dr Hendel President #
#   Permission to reprint with this header PROVIDED   #
#          it is not printed for profit               #
#                                                     #
#    WARNING: READ with COURIER 10 (Fixed width) FONTS#
#                                                     #
#######################################################
#*#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc., 2003, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#*#*#
VERSE: Gn30-27a
RASHIS COVERED: Gn30-27a Gn44-15a Nu23-23a Nu24-01c Dt18-10d
Ex13-05c Ex12-05c
Gn30-27a
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-03


SUCCINCT SUMMARY
----------------
One of Rashis 6 main goals is to explain the meaning
of words the same way the dictionary explains meaning.
Rashi had a variety of vehicles to explain meaning.

A famous punchy method of describing items is using
PERSONIFICATION -- that is the activity or attribute
is named by a person or animal that is distinguished
in that regard.

PERSONIFICATION itself is part of a general trend
of language to identify the whole with its parts
This is called SYNECDOCHE(Whole and parts).

EXAMPLES OF SYNECDOCHE
----------------------
- HONEY means anything SWEET
- BREAD means any FOOD
- LAMB means any DOCILE YOUNG creature (LAMB,GOAT)
- LAND FLOWING WITH MILK OF HONEY means
- PRODUCE OF LAND FLOWS WITH MILK AND HONEY
- (GOATS of land produce milk; etc)

EXAMPLES OF PERSONIFICATION
---------------------------
Hence we have
- LION meaning COURAGEOUS,
- PIG meaning glutonous etc.

Today we explore SNAKE

- SNAKE=JUMPY (Cf English JUMP TO CONCLUSIONS)
Hence the Talmud interprets DONT SNAKE as DONT
JUMP TO CONCLUSIONS (eg a cat crossed my path
and hence I will have a bad day)

Snake can refer to SUPERSTITIONS, JUMPING TO
CONCLUSIONS or to COINCIDENCES
ITEM DETAIL
RASHI RULE CLASS: WORD MEANINGS
RASHI SUBRULE CLASS 8 METHODS OF NAMING
RASHI WORKBOOK PRINCIPLE #7
SEE BELOW LIST817a
List of words Named by GOOD EXAMPLE
------------------------ -------------------------------
SEE BELOW LIST817b
List of verses where TO SNAKE=TO JUMP to conclusions
LIST817b
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-03

Verses where TO SNAKE means to JUMP to CONCLUSIONS
(eg a cat crossed my path hence I will have bad luck)
SNAKE can also refer to COINCIDENCES
VERSE TEXT OF VERSE
Dt18-10d Dont SNAKE Jump to conclusions *1
Nu23-23a SNAKERS Soothsayers;Superstitious*1 *10
------- ----------------- -------------------------------
Nu24-01c God will SNAKE me NonJewish prophecy*2
------- ----------------- -------------------------------
Gn30-27a I SNAKE the theft You came-then goblet disappeared*3
Gn44-15a I SNAKE blessings You came-then I had sons*4
COMMENTS
*1 eg a cat crossed my path; HENCE I will have bad luck
The SNAKERS are simply professionally superstitious
people who infer coincidences for gullible people


*2 Bilam looks on prophecy as a SNAKE (something
that happens by COINCIDENCE--something that JUMPS
at a person). Nu23-03 describes nonJewish prophecy
as
----------------------------------
Mabye God will COINCIDENCE me
----------------------------------
So prophecy is described as COINCIDENCE and SNAKE
(Rashi notes that Jewish prophecy by contrast
involves preparation and formal invitation--no
surprises)

*3 In other words
- you came
- my Goblet disappeared
HENCE I assume you stole it

This is an example of SNAKING and is no different
then saying a cat crossed my path and hence bad luck
This also illustrates WHY the Torah prohibited
SNAKING (It leads to false accusations and fights)

*4 In Other words
- you came
- and only then did I have male children
Hence I assume you CAUSE the blessing of male children

Again this is an example of SNAKING and is no
different then saying a cat crossed my path*11

LONGER FOOTNOTES

*10 Actually the structure of the chapter is illuminating
--------------- Nu23-20:21 ----------------------------
- CLAUSE 1      I will bless the Jewish people
- CLAUSE 1a     Because there is no sin in them
- CLAUSE 1a1    Hence (because no sin) God is with them
-------------------------------------------------------

In other words
- the Jewish lack of sin CAUSES
- God to be with them which in turn CAUSES me
- to BLESS them (How can I fight God)

Then in Nu23-22:23 Bilam explains why there is
no sin among the Jews

--------- SUPPORT OF NO JEWISH SIN -------------
- God took them out of Egypt the land of sin
- Hence the Jews arent superstitious like Egyptians
(They base their rejections on reality and hence
are respected)
------------------------------------------------

*11 Rashi (Following a Midrash Rabbah) cites
support for the contention that Laban only
had sons after Jacob came (Rashi here uses the
technique of OTHER VERSES)

- When Jacob first came to Laban
We find that Rachel was a shepardess (a mans job)
Apparently Laban did not yet have male children

- When Jacob left however Laban had male
children

So Rashi was simply making a good guess
about WHAT coincidence Laban was thanking
Jacob for (Laban was trying to butter up
Jacob so he shouldnt leave).

There are adult connotations here...the whole
verse was stated tongue and cheek by Laban.
We in fact can combine this with another more
explicit Midrash about the Jacob-Rachel romance
-----------------------------------------
Jacob did not experience any arousal
during the 7 years he worked for Rachel
-----------------------------------------

(Yet another Midrash explains that women
give birth to boys when their husbands
control themselves enough so that the
woman is satisfied first---again the
idea of no unnecessary arousal brought
about by the modest manner of Jacob and
his wives)

Thus it is clear that Jacob Rachel and Leah
created a mature environment which enabled
Laban (who didnt know of such things) to have
male children. Laban therefore says tongue
and cheek...You (Jacob) must be the cause.
#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc.2003, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#