LIST510a
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04
|
A list of verse pairs which contradict each other
The contradictions are resolved by viewing
the 2 verses as two aspects of the same item.
|
|
VERSE-1
|
VERSE-2
|
HOW THE TWO TEXTS ARE COMBINED
|
|
Ex01-16
|
Ex01-12
|
EGYPTIANS hated ALL JEWS;PHARAOH hated MALES*4
|
|
Ex02-06
|
Ex02-06
|
She saw a BABY(in age);a CHILD(in demeanor)*3
|
|
Gn18-06
|
Gn18-06
|
FINE FLOUR for food;COARSE for pot*2
|
|
Dt08-02
|
Lv26-06
|
WHEN OBSERVANT God protects;ELSE not*1
|
|
Nu21-21
|
Dt02-26
|
MOSES sent delegates on behalf of ISRAEL
|
|
Ex20-19
|
Ex19-20
|
Gods voice in HEAVEN;His FIRE on EARTH
|
|
Ex40-35
|
Ex25-22
|
Moses at Entrance; Gods by Crubim
|
|
Ex28-37
|
Ex39-30
|
Priest MASK went AROUND and OVER head
|
|
Ex25-03
|
Ex30-12
|
TAXES for base;VOLUNTARY for vessels
|
|
Nu04-05
|
Nu04-15
|
PRIESTS pack; KEHATHITES carry*10
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMENTS
|
*1 See Lv26-03. Thus Lv26-03:06 explicitly states that
when we observe, God will remove wild animals. Dt08-02
by contrast, explains that conquest of Israel will
happen slowly FOR IF IT HAPPEEND QUICKLY WILD ANIMALS
WOULD COME (because the Jews moral nature was not
yet perfected and the protection of Lv26-03:06
does not yet apply) *11
*2 COARSE flour was used in cooking to wash the pot
sides to clear it from rust producing agents and
rotted food particles.
*3 I should mention the Brilliant Malbim who points
out to a repeated object denoting emphasis
-----------------------------------------
She opened it and saw HIM -- a CHILD
-----------------------------------------
Thus the child had a certain regality *12
*4 This distinction is explicitly mentioned in Ex01-10
Pharoh was concerned that the Jewish minority would
align with an Egyptian enemy. Hence he killed the
males. *13
|
|
LONGER FOOTNOTES
|
*10 Rashis point is strengthened by the abrupt change
of subject
-----------------------------------------------
Nu04-04 This is the job of the KEHATHITES
Nu04-05 The PRIESTS come and cover the articles
...
Nu04-15 ..and AFTERWARDS the KEHATHITES come
-----------------------------------------------
If one just reads Nu04-04 and Nu04-05 by themselves
it appears as if the PRIESTS mentioned in Nu04-05
refer back to the KEHATHITES mentioned in Nu04-04
*11 Interesting Rashi cites a verse in Job rather
than the explicit Lv26-03:06. Rashi also does
not explicitly mention that he is using the rule
of resolving 2 contradictory cases.
But that IS what Rashi does. It seems rather
straightforward to introduce Lv26-03:06. Rashi
probably expected the reader to know this verse
since it comes in the great REBUKE---Rashi complements
this verses with complementary verses in Job
*12 Rashis actual language is that
------------------------------------
She saw Gods presence with him
------------------------------------
I have tempered this a bit as follows
---------------------------
She saw the childs regality
---------------------------
I think Rashis point is to explain why
she risked her life to save a Jewish child
This child was different--he had a certain
regality...why not raise him as an Egyptian
He would fit in well with the Royal house
*13 Rashi actually says
------------------------------------------
Pharohs astrologers said that the Jews
have just had a male savior born.
Pharoh therefore decreed the death of
the male Jews
------------------------------------------
However the REAL driving force of Rashi
is the contradictory verses and the
resolution from an explicit verse.
Rashi avails himself of OTHER VERSES
which show that Pharoh always consulted
with his astrologers (eg Ex08-12:15).
Thus Rashi is simply dressing up the
contradiction. The real point of Rashi
is the contradiction and the distinction
between the people(hated all) and the King.
(concerned about security)
|