LIST090a (C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04
|
List of verses with 2 possible references(antecedent / context)
|
VERSE
|
TEXT: Possible References CAPPED
|
Who is referred to?*1
|
Nu16-01
|
The following arose
|
|
Nu16-01
|
DATHAN and AVIRAM sons of Eliav
|
|
Nu16-01
|
and OHN ben Peles
|
|
Nu16-01f
|
SONS OF REUVEN
|
Both OHN and DATHAN
|
-------
|
--------------------------------
|
------------------
|
Nu14-07
|
The SPIES said:God will give land
|
|
Nu14-09
|
Dont be afraid of the CANAANITES
|
|
Nu14-10a
|
And the Jews wanted to stone THEM
|
Stone the SPIES!
|
-------
|
--------------------------------
|
------------------
|
Nu16-16
|
YOU (Korach)
|
|
Nu16-16
|
and your MOB
|
|
Nu16-16
|
be before God tomorrow
|
|
Nu16-16a
|
You THEM and AAron
|
THEM = YOUR mob*2
|
-------
|
--------------------------------
|
------------------
|
Nu16-03
|
KORACH: Why take ALL LEADERSHIP
|
|
Nu16-28
|
MOSES:By this you will know that
|
|
Nu16-29a
|
God commanded THESE THINGS
|
|
-------
|
--------------------------------
|
------------------
|
Gn23-08
|
Abraham: Let me deal with EPHRON
|
|
Gn23-09
|
Abraham: I-ll PURCHASE the cave
|
|
Gn23-09
|
Abraham: I-ll pay FULL PRICE
|
|
Gn23-11a
|
Ephron No
|
No need to purchase*3
|
-------
|
--------------------------------
|
------------------
|
Nu05-06
|
and HE(THIEF) descecrates God
|
|
.......
|
By robbing SOMEBODY(AGGRIEVED)
|
|
Nu05-06
|
and HE feels guilty
|
THIEF
|
Nu06-07
|
then HE returns the principle
|
THIEF
|
Nu06-07
|
and HE adds a fifth
|
THIEF
|
Nu06-07
|
& HE returns to the agrieved
|
THIEF
|
Nu06-08a
|
But If HE has no relatives
|
AGGREIVED
|
Nu06-08b
|
to return to theft to HIM
|
AGGREIVED
|
-------
|
--------------------------------
|
------------------
|
Ex21-29
|
If the ox of a PERSON
|
OWNER
|
Ex21-29
|
kill SOMEBODY
|
AGGRIEVED
|
Ex21-30
|
Let HIM
|
OWNER
|
Ex21-30
|
Pay the ransom of HIS soul
|
OWNER or AGGRIEVED*4
|
|
|
|
COMMENTS
|
*1 To clarify the use of this list let us review the
first example. The verse cites various people
- Datan, Aviram
- On
The verse then says these were the sons of Reuven
This is ambiguous.
- Were DATAN/AVIRAM sons of Reuven
- Was ON the son of Reuven.
Rashi points out that ALL of them were sons of Reuven
To clarify this we capitalize DATAN / AVIRAM / ON
and then clarify SONS OF REUVEN. The last column
then explains that the CAPPED PHRASE, SONS OF REUVEN
refers to both DATAN and AVIRAM.
*2 Note the ambiguity-- the THEM refers to YOUR MOB.
*3 Abraham made 3 requests (a)Deal with Ephron (B) pay for
field (c) Pay full price.
Ephrons no refers back to PAYING for the field.
This is proven by the next phrase
----------------------------------------
EPHRON: I will GIVE you the field
----------------------------------------
*4 The Talmud cites both views (SOUL OF AGRRIEVED/OWNER)
without coming to a conclusion. The controversy center
on whether
- pronouns refer to the LAST MENTIONED NOUN (So here
the RANSOM OF HIS SOUL refers to the OWNERS soul)
- or do pronouns refer to whatever is defined by CONTEXT
Since killing a slave requires paying a flat fee of 30
units of currency (The abstract worth of slaves) it
follows that RANSOM OF HIS SOUL would refer to the
value of the AGGRIEVEDs soul.
|