####################################################### # 12 YEAR Ayelet DAILY-RASHI-YOMI CYCLE # # MAY 10 th, 2005 # # Rashis 3041-3040 Of 7700 (39.4%) # # # # VISIT THE RASHI YOMI ARCHIVES # # ----------------------------- # # http://www.RashiYomi.Com/thismon.htm # # # # Reprinted with permission from Rashi-is-Simple, # # (c) 1999-2004, RashiYomi Inc., Dr Hendel President # # Permission to reprint with this header PROVIDED # # it is not printed for profit # # # # WARNING: READ with COURIER 10 (Fixed width) FONTS# # # ####################################################### |
#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc. 2005, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#
VERSE: Gn31-10b
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04 | ||
SUCCINCT SUMMARY ---------------- One of Rashis 5 main goals was to explain the meaning of words the same way a dictionary explains words. We call this the RASHI RULE CLASS of WORD MEANING. Rashi had a variety of vehicles to explain meaning. For example: Words can be named by FUNCTION (eg the FUNCTION of the UNITED NATIONS is to UNITE the world) or by APPEARANCE (e.g. the PENTAGON is named by its appearance not by its function). We call this the RASHI SUBRULE CLASS of 8 METHODS OF NAMING since there are 8 major methods that can be used--for example, naming by FUNCTION, APPEARANCE, SUBSTANCE, etc. EXAMPLE Gn31-10b ---------------- In todays example Verse Gn31-10b talks about ------------------------------- The HAIL (Hebrew root BRD) Sheep ------------------------------- Rashi interprets HAIL using the method of naming by appearance. The adjective HAIL = HAIL-LIGHTNING refers to animals - that are patched (patches on skin look like HAIL) - with streaks (streaks look like lightning) | ||
ITEM | DETAIL | |
RASHI RULE CLASS: | WORD MEANINGS | |
RASHI SUBRULE CLASS | 8 Methods of Naming | |
RASHI WORKBOOK PRINCIPLE | #7 | |
SEE BELOW | LIST810b | |
List of | words named by FORM/APPEARANCE |
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04 | |||
List of words named by FORM/APPEARANCE | |||
VERSE | TERM | Refers to ... | |
Ex25-23a | Table STATURE | Table HEIGHT *3 | |
Ex25-31d | MENORAH THIGH | Its Bottom(Rashi) | |
Ex40-22a | Temple THIGH | Temple SIDE | |
Ex40-22b | Temple THIGH | Temple SIDE | |
Lv01-11a | Altar THIGH | Altar SIDE | |
-------- | -------------- | ---------------------- | |
Ex27-03a | POT | GARBAGE PAIL | |
Ex25-31f | MENORAH BUD | Bud-like ornament | |
Ex25-31g | MENORAH FRUIT | Fruit-like ornament | |
Ex25-31h | MENORAH FLOWER | FLOWER-like ornament | |
Ex28-33a | POMEGRANATES | POMEGRANATE ORNAMENTS | |
Gn31-10b | HAIL-LIGHTNING | PATCHED and STREAKED*10 | |
-------- | -------------- | ---------------------- | |
Lv13-03b | CLOUD wound | WHITE wound | |
Ex25-04a | SKY thread | Thread dyed SKY BLUE | |
Ex25-04b | WORM Thread | Thread DYED RED | |
-------- | -------------- | ---------------------- | |
Lv13-55d | PIT wound | DEEP wound(Pechethet) | |
Lv13-18a | LOW wound | ABCESS | |
Ex39-01b | SKY | FLATTENED out*1 | |
Lv11-09b | Fish STUBBLE | Fish SCALES | |
Ex25-25a | Table CASING | SURROUNDS table legs | |
-------- | -------------- | ---------------------- | |
Nu31-50c | The ROUND | EARING JEWELRY | |
Ex28-32a | MOUTH-HEAD | NECK of a garment | |
Ex35-13a | FACE BREAD | Bread with 2 faces | |
Ex28-04d | CHECKERED | CHECKERED Garment | |
Lv11-03a | RIPPED | SPLIT hoofs | |
|
|||
*1 Rashi supplements this explanation by citing verses where RKA means to FLATTEN OUT(eg Isa42-05,P136-07, 2S22-43, Ez06-11,Ex39-03, Nu17-04, Jr10-09--in all these verses RKA means to flatten out/crush) *2 Perhaps the punchiest example is the following - PENTAGON - named by form - U.N. ----- named by function *3 - STATURE is an attribute of HUMANS - HEIGHT is an attribute of OBJECTS | |||
|
|||
*10 Rashi does say -------------------------------------------- HAIL SHEEP means SHEEP WITH PATCHES; and there are no supporting verses in the Bible -------------------------------------------- It appears that Rashi is saying that this meaning cant be proven. But we did prove it using the principle of form. Rather what Rashi really means is that ------------------------------------- this translation cannot be proven using inference from USAGE IN OTHER VERSES ------------------------------------- Our point is that ------------------------------------- This translation can be proven using the principle of NAMING BY FORM ------------------------------------- So Rashi was NOT making a magnanimous statement that the meaning cant be proven...rather he was simply stating that it cant be proven by examining other verses---it however can be proven by using other rules such as naming by FORM/APPEARANCE. This is an important concept--there are 30-60 Rashi rules...often one rule doesnt work but other rules do work. Understand this. |