Why are words REPEATED REPEATED:#4 of 14 ########################################################### # 10 YEAR Ayelet DAILY-RASHI-YOMI CYCLE # # Dec 27 2000 # # Rashis 482-483 Of 7800 (6.2%) # # # # # # http://www.RashiYomi.Com/ # # # # # # Reprinted with permission from Rashi-is-Simple, # # (c) 1999-Present, Dr. Hendel # #Permission to reprint with this header but not for profit# # # # # # # # VISIT THE RASHI YOMI ARCHIVES # # http://www.RashiYomi.Com/calendar.htm # # # # # # WARNING: READ with COURIER 10 (Fixed width) FONTS # # # ########################################################### OVERVIEW: ======== This module deals with Rashis which comment on verses with >REPEATED WORDS<. The basic technique for >REPEATED WORDS< was succinctly formulated by the MALBIM -------------------------------------------------------- When a word is >REPEATED< unnecessarily then the sentence with that word refers to >NON-STANDARD NUANCES< The examples will illustrate how this is implemented -------------------------------------------------------- TODAYS UNIT =========== In todays unit we explore REPEATED VERBS. The Talmud in Baba Metzia 31 has about a dozen examples. They are repeated in one of the references below. The basic idea is as usual: The repeated verb indicates that the activity denoted by the verb should happen in non-standard circumstances REFERENCE: ========= Material in this module comes from a variety of postings. Please check http://www.RashiYomi.Com/h2n20.htm http://www.RashiYomi.Com/dn.htm Also the following url has additional comments on yesterdays postings including extensive discussion of some talmudic commentaries on REPETITION http://www.RashiYomi.Com/h2n19.htm #*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*# (C) Dr Hendel, 2000 *#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#* EXAMPLE 7: Dt13-16a ========== BACKGROUND ---------- The Bible is discussing a city that has defected to idolatry. The law is that upon conviction the entire city must be destroyed The Bible says THE VERSE --------- Dt13-16 >HIT HIT this city by sword< RASHI ----- If the verse had only said >HIT this city by sword< then I would infer that I should destroy the city by sword but if eg I didnt have swords available then I would have no obligation to destroy the city by other means(since the commandment is to destroy it by sword). When however the verse says >HIT HIT this city by sword< the meaning of the sentence is extended to non standard situations---I should hit the city by SWORD, but if I dont have a SWORD then I should eg BURN the city. EXAMPLE 8: Dt15-10a ========== BACKGROUND ---------- The Bible is speaking about giving charity. The context is the charity we give to a slave who has completed his term of service and is leaving THE VERSE --------- Dt15-10 >GIVE GIVE to him (the slave)< RASHI ----- If it had only said >GIVE to him< it would mean that one should give CHARITY >GIFTS<. However by using the REPEATED PHRASE >GIVE GIVE to him< we infer a non-standard nuance of the word >GIVE<: We are eg obligated to >LOAN< him the charity if eg he refuses >GIFTS< COMMENT ------- Thus in one verse the repeated verb endows the >VERB< (>give<) with a non standard meaning (even >LOAN if the person wont accept gifts<) while in the other verse the repeated verb endows the >SENTENCE< (>HIT by sword<) with a non standard meaning (even >HIT by burning< if you dont have swords). #*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*# (C) Dr Hendel, 2000 *#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*