#######################################################
# 12 YEAR Ayelet DAILY-RASHI-YOMI CYCLE #
# Jan 08, 2008 #
# YEAR 9 of 12 #
# #
# VISIT THE RASHI YOMI ARCHIVES #
# ----------------------------- #
# HOME http://www.RashiYomi.Com #
# WEEKLY RASHI http://www.RashiYomi.Com/rule.htm #
# DAILY RASHI http://www.RashiYomi.Com/calendar.htm#
# #
# Reprinted with permission from WEEKLY RASHI, #
# (c) 1999-2008, RashiYomi Inc., Dr Hendel President #
# Permission to reprint with this header PROVIDED #
# it is not printed for profit #
# #
#######################################################
|
#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc. 2008, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#
Verse Gn18-33a completing a paragraph where God and
Abraham discuss the possibility of saving Sedom and Amorah from
destruction, states
And the LORD went His way,
when he completed speaking with Abraham;
and Abraham returned unto his place
Rashi comments:
This teaches court etiquette. A Judge should not declare a final
verdict until all defense arguments have been presented.
This Rashi inference is straightforward. We use it to illustrate
the essence of the FillIn method. When Rashi uses the
FillIn method he is not
- Explaining the meaning of word
- Clarifying grammatical conjugation
- Clarifying nuances from other verses, alignments with
other verses or apparent contradictions with other verses
- clarifying the meaning implied by paragraph style
- explaining symbols
- performing broad database queries on Biblical issues
- clarifying the unspecified emphasis in formatting.
Rather, Fill-In communicates non-verse-inferred lessons
derived from the Biblical text. The emphasis here is on non-verse.
Unlike the other Rashi methods where something is inferred from either
this verse or other Biblical verses, the Fill-In derives
consequences (or presents necessary background) to understanding a verse
without such derivations being even hinted at in the text. It is so to
speak, a real-world derivation.
|
#*#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc., 2008, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#*#*#
|