The table below presents
two contradictory verses.
Both verses speak about
Jacob's wedding night
The underlined words highlight the contradiction.
One verse says
And Jacob loved Rachel; and said, I will serve you seven years for Rachel your younger daughter.
...And it came to pass in the evening, that he took Leah his daughter, and brought her to him; and he went in to her.
while the other verse states
And it came to pass, that in the morning, behold, it was Leah; and he said to Laban, What is this that you have done to me? did not I serve with you for Rachel? why then have you deceived me?
We see the contradiction---Was Jacob double crossed by day or night?
Rashi simply resolves this using the 2 Aspects method:
Jacob wanted Rachel. Rachel knew how Jacob liked to be flirted with.
She shared his flirting preferences with Leah. When Jacob married
Leah he thought he was marrying someone who understood his physical
needs. But in the morning Leah resumed to her old self and it was
only then that Jacob understood he was double-crossed.
Summary
|
Verse / Source
|
Text of verse / Source
|
Jacob was double crossed (Leah vs Rachel) by evening.
|
Gn29-18,23
|
And Jacob loved Rachel; and said, I will serve you seven years for Rachel your younger daughter.
...
And it came to pass in the evening, that he took Leah his daughter, and brought her to him; and he went in to her.
|
Jacob only found out in the morning that he was double crossed
|
Gn29-25
|
And it came to pass, that in the morning, behold, it was Leah; and he said to Laban, What is this that you have done to me? did not I serve with you for Rachel? why then have you deceived me?
|
Resolution:
|
2 Aspects
|
Jacob wanted Rachel. Rachel knew how Jacob liked to be flirted with.
She shared his flirting preferences with Leah. When Jacob married
Leah he thought he was marrying someone who understood his physical
needs. But in the morning Leah resumed to her old self and it was
only then that Jacob understood he was double-crossed.
|
Advanced Rashi:
This is a beautiful example of refutation of a flippant reading of Rashi. Rashi literally says:
Rachel did not want her sister Leah to be embarassed.
Jacob had personal
signs with Rachel since he expected to be double-crossed. But
Rachel gave these signs to Leah.
Notice that Rashi already leaves out the more explicit statements,
found in some midrashim, that Rachel hid under the marital bed so that Jacob should think he was relating to Rachel.
From a conceptual point of view I am interpreting the Rashi comment Rachel gave Leah the personal
signs she and Jacob had agreed on to mean that Rachel
shared highly personal preferences of Jacob in flirting.
I would similarly interpret the phrase found in other midrashim
Rachel hid under the bed to mean Rachel
shared personal flirting signs with Leah.
Sermonic Points:
Men and women view sex differently. Men are more biological while women are more personal.
Men are more likely to select a spouse based on physical
######
|