Verse Ex12-04a
discussing
the requirements of the pascal lamb
states
and if the household is too little for a lamb, then shall he and his neighbour next unto his house take one according to the number of the souls; according to every man's eating ye shall make your count for the lamb.
Rashi clarifies the numerical meaning of the underlined words if the household is too little for a lamb.
Suppose a particular lamb can feed 25 people but a family,
say family A,
only has 10 people. Then the family / household is too
little for the lamb. In such a case family A should invite
family B, which say also has 10 people. In this case the 20
people in family A and B are still too little for the
lamb. In this case they should invite family C who may
also have 10 people.
Rashi in a somewhat beautiful afterthought adds to his
explanation. Rashi was well aware that the phraselogy
if the household is too little for a lamb does not
occur elsewhere in the Bible. Consequently Rashi cannot just
attach a meaning to this phrase without further justification.
######
that family A invite family B and C.>
Many people overlook this aspect of Rashi. Rashi was not milking meaning from an obscrure phrase. Rather the opposite; Rashi inferred the invitation requirement from Ex12-10, - the
prohibition of leftover Pascal meat - and applied,
not derived, this requirement to interpret Ex12-04.
######
######
######
Not so! If Rashi says it, it is pure logic. Here is the simple and straightforward interpretation of Rashi using all three components of the Rashi comments mentioned above:
######
######
The above approach to Rashi is fundamental and may be found in my article Biblical Formatting alluded to above.
|