Todays example combines the formatting and
grammar rules.
Two familiar functions of grammar in all
languages are pronoun reference and
plurality.
Hebrew is more flexible than
English in pronoun reference.
However Hebrew frequently follows the rule in all languages that
a pronoun refers to the last mentioned person.
We have explained in our article
Biblical Formatting located on the world wide web at
http://www.Rashiyomi.com/biblicalformatting.pdf,
that the Biblical Author indicates bold, italics, underline by using
repetition. In other words if a modern author wanted to emphasize
a word they would either underline, bold or italicize it. However when the Biblical
author wishes to emphasize a word He repeats it. The effect - whether
thru repetition or using underline - is the same. It is only the
means of conveying this emphasis that is different.
Armed with these two rules we review the subjects in the various
verselets in Ex18-07:12.
Verse
|
Subject
|
Brief summary of text
|
Repetition?
|
Who did it?
|
Ex18-07
|
Moses
|
Went out to greet his father-in-law
|
|
Moses
|
Ex18-07
|
He
|
Bowed
|
|
Moses Bowed (Pronoun refers to last mentioned person)
|
Ex18-07
|
He
|
Kissed him
|
|
Moses
|
Ex18-07
|
They
|
Asked each other how they were
|
|
Moses and Yithro
|
Ex18-08
|
Moses
|
Told the story of the exodus
|
Yes: See below for an explanation.. Moses alone told the stories
without any further briefing from his staff(Aaron and Elders)
|
Moses
|
Ex18-09
|
Yithro
|
Rejoiced on Exodus
|
|
Yithro
|
Ex18-10:11
|
Yithro
|
Blessed God for saving Jews
|
Yes: See below for an explanation. Yithro alone praised God. (Staff gave
respect by allowing him to take the lead)
|
Yithro
|
Ex18-12
|
Yithro
|
Took/Offered sacrifices
|
|
Yithro
|
|
Aaron and elders
|
Came to eat with Yithro
|
Yes: See below for an explanation. Rashi explains that
Aaron and elders ate only with Yithro. Moses was personally serving his
father-in-law!
|
Aaron and Elders
|
Advanced Rashi:We clarify further with
explanatory points:
-
Notice that if a person's name is repeated explicitly instead of being
referred to with a pronoun then we classify this as a repetition which
indicates emphasis. For example Yithro took sacrifices...Aaron
and the elders came to eat with Yithro .. could more properly
be written with a use of a pronoun as follows:
Yithro took sacrifices...Aaron
and the elders came to eat with him ..
- Each repetition is viewed the same way a modern reader views underline,
italics, or bold: It indicates unspecified emphasis
- Rashi typically interprets the unspecified emphasis as connoting
exclusivity, only that person did the activity mentioned.
- Hence Rashi sees an emphasis that Aaron and the elders ate only
with Yithro. Consequently we have the Rashi comment Only with Yithro?
Where was Moses? Moses was serving them! This Rashi comment is derived from
the repetition.
- Although Rashi does not explicitly explain the other repetitions I have
interpreted them similarly connoting exclusivity:
- Only Yithro blessed God. Presumably the others showed
respect to Yithro and let him take the lead.
- Only Moses told the story of the exodus. Presumably Aaron and the elders
went out to meet Yithro (as is the custom when heads of states or religion meet).
However they showed respect to Moses and let him tell the whole story.
- Rashi interprets He bowed to refer to Moses since Moses is the last mentioned
person. Technically Rashi appears to give a different explanation: How do I know that
Moses bowed? Because it says each man asked how they were doing. And Moses
is called man, a sign of distinction. I believe the real reason Rashi interprets
he bowed as referring to Moses is because of simple grammar - Moses is the last
mentioned person and pronouns refer to the last mentioned person. However Rashi wished to
emphasize the ethical implications of Moses bowing: Moses was a powerful man
and yet did not hesitate to bow to his idolatrous father-in-law and show him respect.
- Finally Rashi mentions that Moses went out to greet his father-in-law and Aaron
and the elders also went out. Quite simply when heads of religion or state meet they
bring their staff with them. Furthermore we see that Aaron and the Elders are mentioned
later on in the paragraph. Hence it is reasonable that they were there.
This Rashi is an excellent example of a variety of principles and is worth studying
by those who wish to master his methods.
|