The table below presents presents
two contradictory verses.
Both verses talk about
paying laborers/employees in a timely manner.
The underlined words highlight the contradiction.
One verse says
pay him by morning
while the other verse says
pay him by sunset.
Which is it?
Is the requirement to pay by morning or evening.
Rashi simply resolves this using both the
2 aspects method:
If a worker completes his services at night then you have from morning
to evening (12 hours) to obtain money to pay him. On the other hand if
a worker completes his services by day you have from sunset to dawn to
obtain money to pay him. In each case the Torah gave the employer time
- half a 24 hour period - to obtain money to pay the employee.
Summary
|
Verse / Source
|
Text of verse / Source
|
Pay the worker by morning
|
Lv19-13
|
You shall not defraud your neighbor, nor rob him; the wages of he who is hired shall not remain with you all night until the morning
|
Pay the worker by sunset
|
Dt24-14:15
|
#####
|
Resolution:
|
2 Aspects:
|
If a worker completes his services at night then you have from morning
to evening (12 hours) to obtain money to pay him. On the other hand if
a worker completes his services by day you have from sunset to dawn to
obtain money to pay him. In each case the Torah gave the employer time
- half a 24 hour period - to obtain money to pay the employee.
|
Advanced Rashi: Rabbi Dr Isidore Twersky, the Talner Rebbe,
pointed out in his
doctoral thesis that we tend to use cliches on Rishonim which upon closer
examination are not universal. For example Rabbi Twersky points out that
we typically think of the Rambam as a rationalist and the Raavad as a
more spiritual emotional person. Rabbi Twersky in his doctoral thesis,
shows examples to the contrary, when Raavad was the rationalist and Rambam
was the mystic.
Following this thought I observe that we tend to think of Rashi as terse
and Rambam as more comprehensive. However in discussion of worker rights
we find the reverse. Rambam is terse, simply citing the law; while Rashi
goes out of his way to explain the law as indicated in the underlined
passages above.
|