#######################################################
# 12 YEAR Ayelet DAILY-RASHI-YOMI CYCLE #
# Sep 20, 2010 #
# YEAR 11 of 12 #
# #
# VISIT THE RASHI YOMI ARCHIVES #
# ----------------------------- #
# HOME http://www.RashiYomi.Com #
# WEEKLY RASHI http://www.RashiYomi.Com/rule.htm #
# DAILY RASHI http://www.RashiYomi.Com/calendar.htm#
# #
# Reprinted with permission from WEEKLY RASHI, #
# (c) 1999-2010, RashiYomi Inc., Dr Hendel President #
# Permission to reprint with this header PROVIDED #
# it is not printed for profit #
# #
#######################################################
|
#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc. 2010, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#
The Formatting rule includes the methods of writing consecutive paragraph or
sentences. Just as a paragraph is a collection of sentences unified by a topic sentence
and developed by supporting sentences, so too, a chapter very often has a theme that is
developed by a skillfully sequenced set of paragraphs. Rashi knew of 3 methods of writing
consecutive paragraphs
- Cause-effect: The second paragraph is the effect of the first paragraph.
The first paragraph is the cause of the second paragraph.
- Contrast: The two paragraphs illustrate contrasting sides of a theme.
- Unified theme: The two or more paragraphs illustrate a common theme.
For example a common theme may be illustrated by a sequence of paragraphs each of which
exemplifies and illustrates the theme idea.
The above three principles indicate methods for paragraph development into chapters as
well as methods for sentence development into paragraphs.
We formerly classified paragraph and chapter development under the grammar rule.
However we think it more proper to devote the grammar rule to the relation between
meaning and form, for example how verb conjugational forms indicates meaning. As indicated
above the formatting rule governs use of sequence to indicate climax and
paragraph sequencing.
Rashi on
Ex15-03b
explains the verse sequence in two paragraphs/sentences,
indicating contrastive relationship.
- Ex15-03b
God is a man of war [but nevertheless]
- Ex15-03b
God [i.e. the God of Mercy] is his
[real] name.
Advanced Rashi: We reject Rashi's first explanation that
God is a man of war: God [fights with his] name.
We reject this explanation since we find God fighting with other materials
besides His Name.
For example P011-06 describes God's fighting as
Upon the wicked he shall rain coals, fire and brimstone,
and a scorching wind shall be the portion of their cup.
Thus we think Rashi's second explanation is truer. It also rings
nicly - even though God fights and kills the Egyptians He is still the
God of Mercy. Rashi in fact adds: Other kings when they fight,
do not have time for economic and building matters. But God, even when he
fights, has time for mercy.
|
#*#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc., 2010, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#*#*#
|