The FFF submethod states that words can be named by
Form, Feel, and Function.
- Some examples
of naming words by Form include (a) the leg of
a chair, (b) the handle of a pot, (c) the branch
of a family tree, (d) surfing the net or (e) brainstorming
Some of these examples illustrate naming objects by form while
other examples illustrate naming activities by form.
- A good punchy
example distinguishing naming by form vs. function is pentagon-UN.
The pentagon is named after the shape and form of the building
while the United Nations is named after the function and purpose of the building. Although both these buildings have as a purpose world peace they are named
differently.
- Examples of naming by feel/substance are
glasses, hardship, ironing-board, plaster etc.
The FFF principle is a special case of the literary techniques of
synechdoche-metonomy. These literary principles, universal to all languages,
state that items can be named by related items, by parts of those items, or by good
examples of those items. For example honey refers to anything sweet
since honey is a good example of something sweet. Similarly hot refers to matters of love since the two are related. Todays Rashi can best
be understood by applying these principles.
Verse
Nu04-09a
discussing
transporting the Candellabrah when the Temple was dismantled
states
And they shall take a cloth of blue, and cover the Candellabrah,
and its flames, and its tongs, and is pans,
and all its oil utensils, with which they minister to it;
Rashi explains the underlined word flames metonomycally as ...referring to the containers
in which the wicks and oil were placed. Here the containers are named by their function, to
produce flames (Similar to naming the United nations by its function).
We can therefore retranslate the verse using this metonomycal explanation:
And they shall take a cloth of blue, and cover the Candellabrah,
and its wick-containers, and its tongs, and is pans,
and all its oil utensils, with which they minister to it;
|