First some background. Jacob had fled from Laban. Laban makes
hot pursuit and overtakes him. Laban clandestinely threatens him:
Gn31-29 states
It is in the power of my hand to hurt you; but the God of your father spoke to me last night, saying, Take heed that you speak not to Jacob either good or bad.
Later as Laban and Jacob continue their heated discussion Laban states in Gn31-43
And Laban answered and said unto Jacob: 'The daughters are my daughters, and the children are my children, and the flocks are my flocks, and all that thou seest is mine; and what can I do this day for these my daughters, or for their
Rashi Fills in the meaning of the cryptic underlined phrase:
and what can I do this day for these my daughters
by tieing it to the previous verse with a threat:
How can I harm you seeing that my daughters are your wives.
Here the sole purpose of Rashi is to Fill in implied meaning using
common sense. For this reason we call this Rashi method the fill-in.
Advanced Rashi: It is also possible to derive this Rashi using
the Rabbi Ishmael rules. The rule Inference from context would justify
interpreting what can I do to mean How can I harm them--they are my daughters.
Laban initially said that God was the reason why he
wasn't hurting Jacob as we find in verse
Gn31-29 which explicitly states
It is in the power of my hand to hurt you; but the God of your father spoke to me last night, saying, Take heed that you speak not to Jacob either good or bad.
However Laban was simply shakin up by having God visit him. He wasn't religious. He therefore
tried to cover up his sudden religious experience: The reason I don't hurt you has nothing
to do with God - rather, if I hurt you I would have to hurt your wives, my daugthers, and I
don't want to hurt them.
Thus this Rashi shows us how wicked people cover up religious experiences with alternate
explanations.
|