Today we ask the database query:
How are genealogies indicated?
The query uncovers
many
examples.
An examination of these
examples justifies the Rashi assertion that
Genealogy by father is standard. Genealogy by brother
indicates help in marriage. Genealogy with omission indicates
lack of approval.
The table below presents results of the query
along with illustrations of Rashi's comment.
Verse
| Verse text
| Genealogy method
| Inference
|
Nu01-05:15
| EliTzur son of Shedayur
| By father
| No inference - standard
|
Gn28-09
| Machalath ...brother of Nevayoth
| By brother
| He cared for her - helped her get married
|
Ex06-23
| Elishevah ...brother of Nachshon
| By brother
| He cared for her - helped her get married
|
Gn34-25
| Shimon and Levi ....brothers of Dinah
| By brother
| They cared for her (fought a city and saved her)
|
Nu16-01
| Korach son of Yitzhar son of Kehath son of Levi
| By father,grandfather up to Levi (but no mention of Jacob/Israel)
| There behavior was non-Israelite
|
Advanced Rashi:
Rashi cutely mentions 1C06-22:23 where the sons of Korach who composed,
sang and delivered temple songs, were listed in full genealogy going back
to Jacob. This verse contrasts nicely with our verse.
The main point here is that the database method uncovers
the innuendo and exposes it as intended by the author. The large number
of standard genealogies proves that non-standard genealogies were intentionally
produced to hint at certain inuendos.
|