#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*# (C) Dr Hendel, 2000 *#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*
-----------------------------------------------------------
| Rashi is Simple Version 2.0 |
| (C) Dr Hendel, Summer 2000 |
| http://www.RashiYomi.Com |
| PERMISSION to reprint WITH this header if NOT for profit |
------------------------------------------------------------
VERSE: Gn32-08a
RASHIS COVERED: Gn32-08a Gn32-09b
{LIST}
Rashi uses the principle of CLIMACTIC DEVELOPMENT OF VERSES. Here
is the Biblical text
=================================================================
VERSE EMPHASIS
===== ========
And Jacob feared (from Esauv) He was afraid he'd be murdered
And Jacob was distressed*1 *2 Should he be defensive/agressive
He divided the camps into 2 *2
If one camp goes,Ill save other We will fight with the 2nd camp*2
NOTES
=====
{LIST}
*1 The phrase >Distresses him< can be used to indicate not FEAR
but a difficult decision between unpleasant ALTERNATIVES
For example
=============================================================
VERSE EVENT THE CHOICES CAUSING THE DISTRESS
===== ===== ================================
2S24-14 Punishment of David He was given 3 choices
2S13-2 Amnons sickness To abstain Or Rape
2S30-6 Davids army angry To desert them or fight for them
Lv18-18 Man with 2 wives*a Which one should he chose
Gn32-08 Esauv coming to Jacob Start with attack;or wait & see
NOTES
=====
*a That is the word DISTRESSOR refers to a CO-WIFE
apparently because the two women fight over who
will have him
{END LIST}
*2 Our point is, that the CLIMACTIC development is dictating
meaning.
By contrast the Chizkuni, a major commentator on Rashi tried
to find nuances in the word >DISTRESSED< vs the word
>FEAR<. In other words the Chizkuni tried to suggest that
it was the >NUANCES< of the words >DISTRESS< and >FEAR<
that caused Rashi to interpret the word >DISTRESSED< as
meaning >Should I fight or defend--how should I approach
Esauv<
We suggest that Rashi inferred this meaning from the
CLIMACTIC progression of the verses. It is the verses
that EXPLICITLY state that >If Esauv hits one camp then
the other one will be saved<.
So Rashi interpreted this to mean that Jacob chose a semi-
defensive stand: He divided his camps and decided to wait
to attack 2nd not first and only on destruction of the
other camp.
(This possibly has relevance to the situation
today in Israel--defensive vs aggressive stand--but we
refrain from making any further political statements
However we explicitly note that former premier Golda
Meirs statement >We will forgive those who have killed
us but will not forgive those who made us murder< is
taken almost verbatim from this Rashi and Midrash Rabbah
Again the point is that Jacob preferred to risk losing
50% of his population rather than INITIATE an offensive
position).
For those trained in war note that had Jacob chosen to
take an offensive stand he would say have divided his
army into 4 camps(which is an OFFENSIVE position). The
2 camp position is more a defensive position since
there is greater vulnerability
{END OF LIST}
RASHI RULE USED: EXAMPLE9
---------------------------------------------------
WARNING: The following additional references may be too wordy
However they frequently contain additional information & lists
The hyperlinks only work on the main website
Volume 8 Number 13
#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*# (C) Dr Hendel, 2000 *#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*
Volume 8 Number 13