ALTERNATIVE TO THE WORD to |
-- FROM YESTERDAY --
EXAMPLE 77: Gn14-10b Going *TO* A PLACE can be indicated by HEY
EXAMPLE 78: Gn28-02a Going *TO* A PLACE can be indicated by HEY
EXAMPLE 79: Gn28-02b Going *TO* A PLACE can be indicated by HEY
-- NEW --
EXAMPLE 80: Gn44-13b Going *TO* A PLACE can be indicated by HEY
EXAMPLE 81: Gn46-01a Going *TO* A PLACE can be indicated by HEY
BACKGROUND:
-----------
If you are GOING or COMING to e.g. New York you would say
-----------------------
I AM GOING TO NEW YORK
-----------------------
An alternative form (in Hebrew) is to append a HEY sound
to the end of the word
----------------------------------------------------
I am going NEW YORK-eh ENGLISH
ANi HoLayCh NuYork--Ah HEBREW
----------------------------------------------------
THE TEXT AND RASHI
------------------
Rashi on various verses containing terminal HEYS points
out that this terminal HEY is a substitute for the
word TO
THE LIST
--------
The LIST below presents several such examples of this
rule. The footnotes elaborate on further details. The
first 3 examples are from yesterdays unit. The last 2
examples are new
|
VERSE: |
TEXT OF VERSE OF GOING TO A PLACE |
HEY FORM OF to |
Gn14-10b |
The remnant FLED TO THE MOUNTAIN |
Fled MOUNTAIN-ah |
Gn28-02b |
GO TO..THE HOUSE of Betuel |
GoTo HOUSeh Betuel |
Gn28-02a |
GO TO PADEN ARAM*1 |
GoTo PADENah ARAM |
Gn46-01a |
& they CAME TO BEER SHEVA*1 |
CAME BEER-ah SHEVA |
Gn44-13b |
they RETURNED TO THE CITY*2 |
RETURNED CITY-ah |
|
|
|
COMMENTS |
*1 Note how Rashi develops a subrule on this verse
The HEY rule applies to places with one word names
This verse (Gn28-02) contains a 2-word name: PADEN ARAM
One needs to know whether to place the HEY after the 1st
or 2nd word. Rashi tells us to place the hey after the
1st word: PADEN-ah ARAM (not: PADEN ARAMah). Similarly
in Gn46-01 it is BEERah SHEVVA vs BEER SHEVA-ah
*2 Note Rashis pedagogical genius. Up till now Rashi has
simply stated two APPARENTLY EQUIVALANT ways of
indicating TO
-- GO TO EGYPT
-- GO EGYPT-ah
On Gn44-13 Rashi explains a subtle difference between the
two methods:
-- The TO form has an emphasis on ACTUALLY GETTING THERE
-- The HEY form has an emphasis on the DIRECTION of motion
So Gn44-13, THEY RETURNED THE CITY-ah indicates that they
RETURNED TO THE OUTSKIRTS OF THE CITY but did not necessarily
enter the city proper. This would make sense: They were
accused of robbery---under such circumstances they did not
want to risk coming into the city.
|