Rashi-Is-Simple Mailing List
             VISIT the RASHI DATABASE archives AT
                  http://www.RashiYomi.com/
                  Surfing the Talmudic Seas

               (C) RashiYomi Incorporated, 2004
               Written by Dr Russell Jay Hendel

                     Volume 21 Number 11
          For the WORD QUALITY PDF VERSION click here
               -----------------------------------
               http://www.Rashiyomi.com/h21n11.pdf
               -----------------------------------
                    Produced Mar 24 th, 2004

       WARNING: USE FIXED WIDTH FONTS (eg COURIER (NEW) 10)
#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc.2004, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#*#
OVERVIEW OF HILIGHTS IN THIS ISSUE
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04

Whats new and hot in this issue?
ITEM WHATS NEW & HOT IN THIS ISSUE
PASSOVER Happy Passover--read Passover Torah *1
Radak-Talmud Interesting Radak-Talmud controversy harmonized*3
COMMENTS
*1 Visit http://www.Rashiyomi.com/pa.htm for crisp Kosher
LePesach Passover Torah

*2 RashiYomi will be closed the week of Passover and
resume the week afterwards. We will have early but
regular postings next week.

*3 Rabbi Reinman (Author of 1 PEOPLE 2 WORLDS) was a visiting
scholar at Shomrey Emunah this week and gave a Tanakh
lecture in which he showed a Radak-Talmudic controversy.
As is the usual approach on Rahiyomi I present a
unified approach to both Radak and Talmud below
Rashis covered in this issue
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04

VERSE RULE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
======== =============== =======================================
Lv01-14b ALIGNMENT YONAH birds must be YOUNG;TOR birds,OLD
Lv01-14c ALIGNMENT YONAH birds must be YOUNG;TOR birds,OLD
Lv01-15c WORD MEANINGS Idiom of BLOOD BE SQUEEZED onto altar
Lv01-16a WORD MEANINGS CROP of Bird = PLACE(Mem)of DUNG(R'-I)
Lv01-02a DATABASE 2 offerings types:VOLUNTARY,OBLIGATORY
Lv05-21a DATABASE M-A-L = violation of a deep relation
--------- ---------------- ---------------------------------------
*#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc., 2004, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#*#*#
VERSE: Lv05-21a
Lv05-21a
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04


SUCCINCT SUMMARY
----------------
One of Rashis 5 main goals is the explanation of meaning
the same way a dictionary presents meaning. One method of
explaining meaning was to present a UNIFIED MEANING to a
root with varied meanings.

EXAMPLE Lv05-21a M-A-L
----------------------
We can gather all verses with the Hebrew root M-A-L which
can refer to DESCECRATION of a marriage (adultery)
or DESCECRATION of the God-Man relationship (Idolatry,
intermarriage).

Hence if we find ONE example to the contrary -- Lv05-21a which
speaks about a person who denies money owed -- it is very
reasonable to interpret M-A-L in this verse as applying to
the FALSE OATH-Which is a violation of the God-man relationship-
which the person takes to deny this money.
ITEM DETAIL
RASHI RULE CLASS: WORD MEANINGS
RASHI SUBRULE CLASS UNIFIED MEANINGS
RASHI WORKBOOK PRINCIPLE #7
SEE BELOW LIST862x
List of meanings of root M-A-L=Violation of a deep relationship
LIST862x
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04

List of meanings of root M-A-L=Violation of a deep relationship
VERSE TO WHOM NATURE OF SIN
Lv05-15:16 God Temple matters
Nu31-16 God Intermarriage-idolatry*1
Jo07-01 God Violation of oath
Ez20-27:29 God Idolatry - Bamah (Private altars)
Ezra9-1:4 God Intermarriage
--------- ---------- ----------------------------------
Nu05-12 Man-woman Descecrate her marriage(Adultery)*2
--------- ---------- ----------------------------------
Lv05-21a Man-man Denial of moneys owed -- oath*3
COMMENTS
*1 Nu31-16 cross references Nu25-01:09 which clearly mentions
both these sins (e.g. Nu25-02)

*2 It would appear from this Husband-wife example(adultery)
that M-A-L refers to a violation of any DEEP PERSONAL
RELATIONSHIP (Such as acts of adultery to man, or
idolatry/intermarriage to God)

*3 This verse is the ONLY example where M-A-L does not seem
to refer to VIOLATION of the GOD-MAN relationship or to
violation of ther marital relationship.For Lv05-21a
speaks about a person who denies money owed, It is therefore
reasonable to interpret M-A-L in this verse as apptlying to
a FALSE OATH (Which is a violation of the God-man
relationship)*10 *11

LONGER FOOTNOTES

*10 Rashi citing the Midrash brings additional support: Other
monetary crimes (such as armed robbery, torts, etc) can
involve witnesses and evidence. However the monetary
crimes spoken about in this verse -- keeping lost articles,
witholding wages.... -- are crimes withOUT wintesses
and evidence. Hence the false oath is a violation of
the God-man relationship.

*11 I mention in passing a brilliant Tanakh lecture by
Rabbi Reinman (The author of the book 1 PEOPLE TWO WORLDS,
containing a dialog with a Reform Rabbi).

Rabbi Reinman spoke about the assertion of Radak that
RECHAVAM worshipped idols. Radak derives this from
use of the word M-A-L in 2C12-01:05.

Rabbi Reinman cited various Talmudic passages showing that
Naamah, Rechavams wife was righteous. Rabbi Rineman
then cited 2C12-13:14 to interpret MAL as not
preparing their hearts properly.

However the Radak has a strong case AS SHOWN BY
THE ABOVE LIST. Based on 2C12 which mentions
RECHAVAM REIGNED OVER JERUSALEM THE CITY WHICH
GOD CHOSE TO DWELL IN, I would take a midway
position between RADAK and the TALMUD.

I would suggest that the Jewish sin was restoration
of the private altars (There is precedent for this
in the above list). Hence we immediately see

-Restoration of the private altars is a TEMPLE
violation and would hence justify the term M-A-L

-If all Naamah did was make sure that the Jews
did not worship idols but instead worshipped
private altars then she was indeed Righteous

-Radak would be justified in classifying
RESTORATION OF PRIVATE ALTARS with IDOLATRY
since the sins are similar (But certainly
not identical in severity).

At any rate Rabbi Reinman encouraged detailed
study of Tanakh with Talmud and Rishonim which
of course is warmly welcomed. What we have
added on this email group is advocation of
use of lists.
*#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc., 2004, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#*#*#
VERSE: Lv01-02a
Lv01-02a
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04


SUCCINCT SUMMARY
----------------
Rashi frequently comments by making broad database queries
and noting patterns.

EXAMPLE
-------
We can gather the many Biblical passages on OFFERINGS.
We then ask WHAT REQUIREMENTS or CONDITIONS must
be met before a sacrifice is met.

The database query shows that
- there are offerings that are OBLIGATORY if something
happens (for example, if you SIN or if you must
THANK God for some good event)

- there are offerings that are VOLUNTARY -- that
is they are brought because you feel like bringing
them--but no event necessitated their being brought
ITEM DETAIL
RASHI RULE CLASS: DATABASES
RASHI SUBRULE CLASS DATABASES
RASHI WORKBOOK PRINCIPLE #27
SEE BELOW LIST605p
List of WHEN various offering types are offered
LIST605p
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04

List of                  WHEN various offering types are offered
VERSE WHEN THIS OFFERING IS OFFERED TYPE OF OFFERING
Lv01-02a When a person offers UP offering
Lv02-01 When a soul offers Minchah offering
Lv07-12 If on thanksgiving he offers Peace offering
------- --------------------------- ------------------------
Lv04-02 When a soul sins... *3 Sin offering
Lv05-01 When a soul sins... *3 Guilt offering
Lv05-17 When a soul perhaps sins Guilt-doubt offering
Differs *1 *2
COMMENTS
*1 Clearly the last 3(or 4) Rows have REQUIREMENTS for
bringing the offering (eg Only when a person SINS
or only when he is especially THANKFUL on something.)

By contrast the first 2 (or 3) rows do not have
REQUIREMENTS--hence they must be VOLUNTARY offerings

*2 We exhibit the 5 types of offerings

*3 Both SIN and GUILT offerings require an act of sin
before they are brought. They differ in the type of
sin that causes them.
*#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc., 2004, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#*#*#
VERSE: Lv01-16a
Lv01-16a
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04


SUCCINCT SUMMARY
----------------
One of Rashis 5 main goals was the explanation of meaning
the same way a dictionary explains meaning. Rashi had a
variety of vehicles to explain meaning.

Lv01-16a MEM = PLACE OF
-----------------------
Lv01-16a M-R-A-H (The Crop) = The Place (MEM) of Dung(R'-I)
ITEM DETAIL
RASHI RULE CLASS: WORD MEANINGS
RASHI SUBRULE CLASS 2-4 Letter roots
RASHI WORKBOOK PRINCIPLE #7
SEE BELOW LIST910e
List of words with Prefix MEM meaning PLACE of
LIST910e
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04

List of words with       Prefix MEM meaning PLACE of
WORD MEANS FROM ROOT MEANING MEANING=PLACE of SOMETHING
MURAH CROP R-A-H DUNG Bird Crop=Place of Dung*4
MIKDASH TEMPLE KDSH HOLY TEMPLE=Place of HoLiness*1
MISHMAR PRISON ShMR WATCH PRISON=WATCHED place*2
MISHMERET STORAGE ShMR WATCH STORAGE=Watched place
MIGDAL TOWER GDL BIG TOWER=BIG PLACE
MIKRAH HOLIDAY KRA Proclaimed HOLIDAY=Proclaimed day*3
COMMENTS
*1 Ex25-08a (See Epsteins translation of Rashi who presents
a similar list)

*2 Ex16-23a

*3 PLACE is in SPACE;
DAY is in TIME.
MEM can equally mean a PLACE of
something or a TIME of something.

*4 Lv01-16a
*#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc., 2004, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#*#*#
VERSE: Lv01-15c
Lv01-15c
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04


SUCCINCT SUMMARY
----------------
One of Rashis main goals is to explain word meaning the
same way a dictionary explains meaning. Rashi had a variety
of vehicles by which to explain meaning. Frequently Rashi
will explain new idiomatic usage of known words.

EXAMPLE Lv01-15c
----------------
- BIBLICAL TEXT: The blood will be SQUEEZED out on the altar
- RASHI: He pushed the slaughtered animal against the altar
wall so that its blood squeezed out onto the altar.
ITEM DETAIL
RASHI RULE CLASS: WORD MEANINGS
RASHI SUBRULE CLASS NEW MEANINGS
RASHI WORKBOOK PRINCIPLE #7
SEE BELOW LIST854z
List of 2-3 word Biblical idioms
LIST854z
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04

A List of Biblical idioms..eg FROM DAYS DAYS=YEARLY
LIST854z continues  LIST854d
VERSE BIBLICAL PHRASE TRANSLATION NOTES
Lv01-15c BLOOD BE SQUEEZED Squash animal on wall *7
Ex30-27f BY ITSELF BY ITSELF Equally for each one
Ex30-04a SIDE OF SIDES Corner *6
Ex14-05b CHANGE OF HEART Changed his mind
Gn43-29a FIND GRACE Wish(ed) you well *5
Gn24-57a ASK HER MOUTH Discuss/get opinions *4
Ex12-06d BETWEEN THE EVES NOON *3
Gn37-03a SON OF OLD AGE Youngest *1
Gn37-26b COVER BLOOD Conceal murder *2
Ex21-21a DAY OR DAYS 24 hours
Lv13-39a DULL WHITE DULL WHITE
COMMENTS
*1 Rashi points out 3 equally possible meanings
- Youngest son (Son born while father  was ELDERLY)
- Wisest son (ELDER=WISDOM)
- Son who resembles father (despite old age he still
looks like son)

*2 This is an example of a DOUBLE METONOMY
Blood is ASSOCIATED with life and COVER is
associated with denial. Hence COVER-BLOOD=conceal-murder

*3 NOON is the midpoint between EVE and DAWN. Hence
NOON is the BETWEEN THE EVES.

*4 The context is the proposed marriage of 15 year old
Rivkah to Isaac from another country. The offer had
been made by the servant of Abraham to Rivkahs family

The Biblical text states: Let us(her parents)
ASK HER MOUTH

This is the ONLY time in the Bible that this
phrase occurs(The verb ASK occurs frequently).
Apparently this phrase means
- Lets DISCUSS or LETS GET AN OPINION*10
Such an interpretation is appropriate for a marriage
decision

*5 FIND-GRACE can equally mean I WISH YOU WELL or
YOU WERE WISHED WELL. Rashi points out that GRACE
by itself has this same connotation (Without the
full phrase FIND GRACE). See LIST854g for further
details

*6 Tzade-Lamed-Ayin means SIDE (and hence can refer
to the RIBS). Thus Ex30-04 speaks about the SIDE
OF SIDES--that is the CORNER.

*7 Actually the idiom consists of two parts
- SQUEEZE the blood
- use of the passive (Blood is SQUEEZED)
Hence the idea that the slaughtered animal is
pushed against the altar wall until the blood
oozes forth.

LONGER FOOTNOTES

*10 Hence the Rashi on Gn24-57b: The Biblical text
states that Rivkah responded: I WILL GO.

But Rashi, surprisingly states: I WILL GO WHETHER
YOU LIKE IT OR NOT.

Why did Rashi read such an emphasis into the simple
question and answer
------------------------------------------
PARENTS: Rivkah, Will you go with this man
RIVKAH: I will go.
------------------------------------------

The answer is that the Bible says
------------------------------------------
PARENTS: We will DISCUSS THE MATTER with her;
get her opinion
PARENTS: Rivkah, Will you go with this man
RIVKAH: I will go.
------------------------------------------

Thus the context shows that Rivkah was not
INTERESTED IN A DISCUSSION--she had already
made up her mind
*#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc., 2004, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#*#*#
VERSE: Lv01-14b
RASHIS COVERED: Lv01-14b Lv01-14c
Lv01-14b
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04


SUCCINCT SUMMARY
----------------
Rashi frequently commented using the powerful ALIGNMENT
method: Two or more verses are aligned - the minor difference
between them imply rich nuances.

EXAMPLE Lv01-14b Ex01-14c
-------------------------
- Lv01-14b   ----------- Tor-Birds
- Lv01-14c   CHILDREN of Yonah-Birds

The ALIGNMENT suggests that only ADULT Tor birds could
be brought and only YOUNG Yonah-birds could be brought
ITEM DETAIL
RASHI RULE CLASS: ALIGNMENT
RASHI SUBRULE CLASS 2 CASES
RASHI WORKBOOK PRINCIPLE #10
SEE BELOW LIST313n
Alignment of Which birds could be offered to God
LIST313n
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04

Alignment of             Which birds could be offered to God
VERSE Phrase1 Phrase2
Lv01-14b Tor Birds
Lv01-14c Children of Yonah birds
Differ *1 *2
COMMENTS
*1 So
- Yonah-birds could ONLY be offered from YOUNG birds
- Tor-Birds could ONLY be offered from ADULT birds

*2 CHILDREN applies to YONAH birds. (Hence by implication
ADULTS applies to TOR birds)*10

LONGER FOOTNOTES

*10 Malbim brilliantly points out that the exegesis
is cemeted by the observation that although TOR and
YONAH birds are mentioned several dozen times in the
Torah, nevertheless, CHILDREN is only associated with
YONAH and TOR never has anything associated with it.

It is precisely because this is ALWAYS true that we
have the right to make this exegetical inference
*#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc., 2004, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#*#*#
End of Rashi is Simple Digest
#*#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc., 2004, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#*#*#