*1 Rashi states the following: "If MOTHERS make mistakes it
is because they raise children; if SINGLE women make
mistakes it is because they try to pick people up"
Rashi should be perceived as giving ILLUSTRATIONS of
why being without children is disgraceful for women

*2 Jacob did not NEED permission to leave with HIS wife
But his father-in-law would perceive it as STEALING
his daughter.

*3 Gn27-41 states that Esauv hated Jacob for stealing the
blessing. Gn27-44 states that after a few years this
hatred would subside. Hence Gn33-09 with its statement
I DONT NEED YOUR MONEY confirms these other 2 verses.

*4 Rashi is NOT commenting on the MERE coincidence that
Shimon and Levi are called BROTHERS in two places.
-Gn49-05 talks about Shimon and Levi KILLING and
PLUNDERING
-Gn34 also talks about SHIMON and Levi KILLING
and plundering.
Thus the cross reference is clear. The accident
that they are called BROTHERS in both places
simply spices up the correspondence.

*5 There is also an element of IDIOM (NEW MEANING HERE)
That is Lv25-25:26 speaks about the REDEEMER(=Nearest
of Kin) while Nu35-19 speaks about the BLOOD REDEEMER
However the concepts are similar....the REDEEMER
in each case is the NEAREST OF KIN.

*1 The Bible in Nu35-20:21 describes WILLFUL murder and uses
the verbs PUSH WITH HATRED, THROW WITH HATRED, SMITE WITH
HATRED

*2 The Bible in Nu35-22:23 describes NEGLIGENT murder
and uses the verbs PUSH/THROW. Although it does not
use the verb TO SMITE we can see thru the alignment
that it is intended (Rashi Nu35-23a)*10

*3 A comparison of the adjectives in both columns shows some
criss-crossing (eg AYVAH is used with PUSH vs SMITE).

The adjectives used S-N-H, A-Y-Vah Tz-D-Y-H all seem to
denote WILLFUL HATRED. This is consistent with the explicit
phrase in Nu35-23...HE WAS NOT HIS ENEMY as well as with
the fact that Tz-D-Y-H normally denotes HUNTING (Cf the
English HUNTING HIM DOWN to denote malicious hatred)

In summary: The words used mean HATRED(Rashi:Nu35-20a)

*10 The full text is as follows
----------------------------------------------------------
- If he PUSHED him -------------------- without HATRED or
- If he THREW on him ------------------ without AMBUSH or
- [If he------------] a lethal stone--- he wasnt his ENEMY
----------------------------------------------------------

Clearly the intent of the last phrase is IF HE HIT HIM WITH
A LETHAL STONE.

This obvious ellipsis is consistent with the verbs used
in the previous verses describing willful murder:PUSH, THROW
HIT (Rashi Nu35-23a)

*1 The comparison is not intrinsically needed
to understand the text. Rather...the comparison
enhances the argument presented
---------------------------------------------
If the women of the tribe marry out of the
tribe then their fathers
estate, when inherited, will leave the tribe
AND ALSO NOT COME BACK EVEN IN JUBILEE
---------------------------------------------