*10 The explanation of the list should be clear
- The first column gives the NUMBER of the RASHI RULE used
All Rashi rules may be found with examples at
http://wwww.Rashiyomi.com/workbook.htm

- The second column gives the LIST ID (eg LIST210z) which
contains many examples of a particular Rashi technique and
includes the example presented in the third column

- The third column gives a lightning summary of the Rashi
with particular emphasis on the Rashi rule used.

*1 From the alignment we infer that PARAN WILDERNESS
was sort of a state which had the municipalities
of BURY LUSTFUL and PASTURES

*1 Rashi states the following: "If MOTHERS make mistakes it
is because they raise children; if SINGLE women make
mistakes it is because they try to pick people up"
Rashi should be perceived as giving ILLUSTRATIONS of
why being without children is disgraceful for women

*2 Jacob did not NEED permission to leave with HIS wife
But his father-in-law would perceive it as STEALING
his daughter.

*3 Gn27-41 states that Esauv hated Jacob for stealing the
blessing. Gn27-44 states that after a few years this
hatred would subside. Hence Gn33-09 with its statement
I DONT NEED YOUR MONEY confirms these other 2 verses.

*4 Rashi is NOT commenting on the MERE coincidence that
Shimon and Levi are called BROTHERS in two places.
-Gn49-05 talks about Shimon and Levi KILLING and
PLUNDERING
-Gn34 also talks about SHIMON and Levi KILLING
and plundering.
Thus the cross reference is clear. The accident
that they are called BROTHERS in both places
simply spices up the correspondence.

*5 There are many verses which explicitly confirm
Lv06-05b - that the DAILY UP OFFERING must be
the first offering of the day and the last (any
other offerings must be offered strictly inbetween
them). Here is a partial list of verses where this
principle is enunciated
Nu28-15,23,24,31 Nu29-06,11,16,22,25...Lv03-05*10

*10 Lv06-05b only speaks about THE UP..but in light
of these other verses the word THE clearly refers
to the DAILY UP.

Rashi(following the Talmud) further declares
--------------------------------------------
We also derive from this verse (Lv06-05b) That:
Just as no offering can be offered BEFORE
the DAILY UP (the DAILY UP must be the FIRST)
so no offering can be offered AFTER the
EVENING DAILY UP (the EVENING DAILY UP must
be the LAST).
--------------------------------------------

My own opinion is that Rashi simply indicates
a derivation by analogical logic (not by
verse derivation). In other words since all
the other verses state
----------------------------------------
this offering must be offered AFTER (AL)
the MORNING DAILY UP
----------------------------------------
we infer (by LOGIC, not by VERSE) that
the EVENING DAILY UP should have a similar
status (no offering offered AFTER)

*1 The precise Rashi argument is as follows
- The paragraph structure CLEARLY shows a BULLETED LIST
- Hence we are justified in identifying each BULLET
as a separate item
- But bullets 3 and 6 seem to refer to contact with humans
- So Rashi interprets bullet 3 as a priest who touches
a person who touched a dead body
- but bullet 6 refers to a priest who touches a dead body

Furthermore,
since bullet 6 states IN ANY UNCLEAN STATE we are justified
in including all unclean human states (CONTACT WITH DEAD,
LEPROSY, UNUSUAL FLOW)*10

*2 Of course verse Nu05-02 only lists Bullets A,B,C once.
I have repeated them to show the correspondence with
Lv22-04:07. The paragraph design itself suggests that
the 3 Bullets of Nu05-02 (A,B,C) refer to the same
class of items in Bullets 1,2,3,4,5,6 in Lv22-04:07.

That is both paragraphs refer to the same classes
of unclean people
- Lepors
- People with flows (Unusual or ordinary)
- Contact with dead (Dead people,dead animals,or
people who touched dead people)
We clearly see here that the inference is based on
PARAGRAPH STRUCTURE vs NUANCES OF WORDS *11

*10 LIST005n presents the five meanings of ALL (one of which
is ANY which indicates that ANY uncleanness can be
included - NO EXCEPTION)

*11 This method of inference--based on broad paragraph design
differs from the traditional methods--say that of the Malbim,
-- who makes these inferences from INDIVIDUAL WORDS (vs
PARAGRAPH STRUCTURE)--that is Malbim infers from
the phrases--ALL people with flow and ALL people with
uncleanness to the spirit--Malbim infers from these
phrases that we include ALL unclean people(Unusual vs
ordinary flows etc).

I believe this example hilights the difference between my
approach (Emphasis on paragraph structure and broad sweeping
design) vs the traditional approach of say Nechama Leibowitz,
Rabbi Boncheck, or Malbim. While there might be sympathy
for making inferences from the word ALL, I think that my
position, that inferences can be made from PARAGRAPH DESIGN
is equally cogent.

In passing I would answer Malbim as follows:
- The sifrah in Lv22-04:07 clearly derives from the word
- ALL that the laws apply eg to other unclean people such as
- those who have had contact with a lepor
- (vs the lepor himself) Since the Sifrah makes this
- inference in Leviticus I think a similar inference is
- justified in Numbers.

At any rate to summarize:
- The references of the Bullets in Lv and Nu are made,
according to me, based on broad paragraph design.
Both sets of bullets refer to the same items
- Malbim however infers the sameness of reference
based on the meaning and nuances of individual words
like ALL which indicates broad meaning.
- I go further and infer from the word ALL that all other
unclean people are included in these laws.

This is a fundamental difference in approach--carefully
review this and understand it.

*1 Rashi: The CLIMACTIC development
- 12 hours
- 24 hours
- 2 days
- Month
- DAYS
clearly shows that the word DAYS means a YEAR (Even
though DAYS by itself normally does not mean a YEAR)
Here Rashi infers meaning from PARAGRAPH STRUCTURE
and CLIMACTIC development (but not from the meaning
of the words involved).

This is a fundamental principle! Understand it.

*1 Rashi: The GENERAL-DETAIL form emphasizes that Passover
is ONLY observed on the 14th of Nissan--even if it falls
out on Shabbas and even if a person is Unclean.