*10 The explanation of the list should be clear
- The first column gives the NUMBER of the RASHI RULE used
All Rashi rules may be found with examples at
http://wwww.Rashiyomi.com/workbook.htm

- The second column gives the LIST ID (eg LIST210z) which
contains many examples of a particular Rashi technique and
includes the example presented in the third column

- The third column gives a lightning summary of the Rashi
with particular emphasis on the Rashi rule used.

*1 Same in all phrases

*2 From the alignment we infer that PCL means TO PEEL
- PCLed*10 = verb form = TO PEEL
- PCLs*10  = noun form = PEELs

*3 These supplementary phrases support the contention
that Jacob PEELED the branches EXPOSING their white bark

*10 We are of course mixing Hebrew and English here.
- The ED in PCLed is simply a way of indicating a verb form
- the S in PCLs is simply a away of indicating a noun form

The actual Hebrew is WIPCL-vs PCLed and PCLWT vs PCLs

*1 We infer from alignment that the Hebrew root X$P
means UNCOVER/EXPOSE

*1 CAMELS and CHILDREN implies a FAMILY LIFE. So
CAMELS mated one to one with one child (In contrast
to other animals such as goats which had a 1:10
ratio) Thus the Torah teaches us to be discrete
when talking about modestly behaving people*11

*10 Notice the remarkable fact that although ALL THREE
inferences presented in this list come from an
alignment of Gn32-15:16 nevertheless
- two of the Rashis occur in Gn32
- one of the Rashis occurs in Gn30,another chapter

This is typical of Rashi...very often the REASON
for a Rashi does not lie in the verse but in
another verse

*11 See LIST604a
Notice the contrast of COARSENESS vs DISCRETION
- e.g. for goats the Torah COARSELY mentions
a 1:10 male:female ratio--


- for camels the Torah discretely mentions
the CAMELS and CHILDREN--
From this we infer that the CAMELS led a family
life--they mated one on one with one child.

The Torah treats these animals discretely by not
mentioning mating ratios but mentioning children

The implication for us is that we should speak
discretely about modest couples

*1 See LIST343L for an analysis of descriptions of the
5 animal pairs mentioned in Gn32-15:16

Notice the contrast of COARSENESS vs DISCRETION
- e.g. for goats the Torah COARSELY mentions
a 1:10 male:female ratio--


- for camels the Torah discretely mentions
the CAMELS and CHILDREN--
From this we infer that the CAMELS led a family
life--they mated one on one with one child.

The Torah treats these animals discretely by not
mentioning mating ratios but mentioning children

The implication for us is that we should speak
discretely about modest couples

*1 QDX refers to a Sickness characterized by BURNING THROBS
like a feeling of SPARKS inside onself

*2 This is a universal phenomenon in both Hebrew and other
languages. For example the Hebrew roots
- GMR
- CLH
also both mean to COMPLETE/FINISH or TO DESTROY

*3 Note that this double meaning ruler:King exists in English
also. The King MEASURES how much each of his subjects
should get

*4 From the basic meaning of HOLE we get
- awl- instrument for making a hole
- woman
- to curse (equals to WISH EMPTINESS and HOLLOWNESS)

From the basic meaning of FIX/FIT we obtain
- Fixing a place for the nail
- Fixing wages Gn30-28a
- Fixing/setting a word--clear pronunciation Lv24-11a
- Fixing/Setting a status - (you who are SET at the
top of the nations (Am06-01) or A new name which
God will SET for you (Is62-02)

*5 Rashi Gn30-38d*10

*10 Rashi makes a further point that the Hebrew verb used
-----------
L-IX-MNH
-----------
takes on a FEMININE suffix.

So the PATCHED sticks (Resembling PATCHED females)
- did not arouse the males
- but rather aroused the females.

The males seeing aroused females then had children by
them.

All this is inferred from the FEMALE SUFFIX: NH in
L-IX-MNH