*10 The explanation of the list should be clear
- The first column gives the NUMBER of the RASHI RULE used
All Rashi rules may be found with examples at
http://wwww.Rashiyomi.com/workbook.htm

- The second column gives the LIST ID (eg LIST210z) which
contains many examples of a particular Rashi technique and
includes the example presented in the third column

- The third column gives a lightning summary of the Rashi
with particular emphasis on the Rashi rule used.

*1 Rashis actual comment is
--------------------------------------------------
Abraham had AMN on the vision of the STARS
but asked for details on the vision of inheritance
--------------------------------------------------

I would trasnlate AMN as TOTALLY DEVOTED. So the
Rashi would mean

---------------------------------------------------
Abraham knew hot to TOTALLY DEVOTE himself to the
vision of the STARS (which are typically symbols of
the Angelic life---so Abraham who walked continuously
in Gods path DEVOTED his entire being to this type
of life).

But Abraham did not know HOW TO devote himself
that his children should INHERIT the land. God
responded to him with the vision of the cut animals
and the prophecy of sojournship in Egypt---in other
words by being sojourners they merited to inherit
the land (of Israel).

Thus our innovation here is to translate Abrahams
question of HOW DO I INHERIT IT--not as a question
about FACT--will I inherit or not--but rather as a
question about METHOD--how should I totally devote
myself

*2 We brought these other verses in to show that the
traditional translation of FAITH/BELIEVE is better
understood in terms of TOTAL DEPENDANCY

Thus in Ex04-01 Moses complained that the Jews would
not BELIEVE (AMN) him when he did miracles.

Moses did not mean that people wouldnt believe he
is a prophet. Rather, people would vacillate
and not TOTALLY DEVOTE THEMSELVES to the cause
of freedom.

*10 This approach to AMN as TOTALLY DEVOTED was largely
inspired by Rabbi Hirschs commentary on Gn15-06

*1 Ex13-20 Jews journeyed from Succoth after Exodus
Ex12-27 Exodus: Jews go from Raamsayth to Succoth
Nu33-05 Exodus, Then Raamsayth, THen Succoth

The point is that Nu33-05 makes it clear that
there were 3 places
- Exodus FROM Egypt
- TO Raamsayth
- TO Succoth.

Ex13-20 only mentions 2 of the places
Ex12-27 makes it sound like they left EGYPT, ie
they left RAAMSAYTH.

It is in fact common for places to have multiple
names. So Nu33-05 illumines that there were 3
distinct places

*2 Also see Ex30-11:16 which prohibits DIRECTLY
counting people. Instead, we must count the
COINS of each person and from this infer
the total count.

*3 Nu17-05 further illumines by calling it a MEMORIAL
Thus we have SYMBOL MEMORIAL BANNER.

Since NAYS means BANNER it refers to anything
that ATTRACTS attention such as SYMBOLS or
MIRACLES

*4 In this example the Hebrew word TaMid can mean
either CONTINUAL or CONTINUOUS depending on context.

*5 Rashi extends the meaning of GIFT TO THE DEAD to
all BURIAL RELATED MATTERS such as provision of
shrouds and the coffin