Rashi-Is-Simple Mailing List VISIT the RASHI DATABASE archives AT http://www.RashiYomi.com/ Surfing the Talmudic Seas (C) RashiYomi Incorporated, 2004 Written by Dr Russell Jay Hendel Volume 24 Number 4 For the WORD QUALITY HTML VERSION click here ----------------------------------- http://www.Rashiyomi.com/h24n4.htm ----------------------------------- Produced Dec 1 st, 2004 |
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04 | |||
* USE FIXED WIDTH FONTS (eg COURIER (NEW) 10)*1 * * IF IN A RUSH--ONLY read the SUCCINCT SUMMARY SECTION * IF you have more time--READ THE LISTS OF EXAMPLES * IF YOU HAVE LOTS OF TIME--read all footnotes * * (UN)SUBSCRIBE/CONTACTS: RJHendel@Juno.com | |||
HOW MUCH TIME DO YOU HAVE | WHAT SHOULD YOU READ | SECTION COLOR | |
Only 2-3 mintues | SUCCINT SUMMARY | BROWN | |
Only 5-8 minutes | LISTS | BROWN/BEIGE/BLUE | |
Maybe 20-30 minutes | BIG FOOTNOTE SECTION | GREEN SECTION | |
Time to do research | SUMMARY OVERVIEWS*2 | Newsletter Bottom | |
|
|||
*1 FIXED WIDTH FONTS are needed for the TEXT version For the HTML version you do not need to reset the browser For html or PDF version visit http://www.Rashiyomi.com/ris.htm *2 Each digest has two summary overviews - LIGHTNING SUMMARIES (List of lists in this issue) - OVERVIEW (List of Rashis covered in this issue) |
*#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc., 2004, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#*#*#
VERSE: Gn37-25c
RASHIS COVERED: Gn37-25c Gn37-25d Gn37-25e Gn37-27a
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04 | ||
SUCCINCT SUMMARY ---------------- One of Rashis 5 main goals was explaining meaning similar to how a dictionary explains meaning. We call this the Rashi rule of WORD MEANING. Rashi had 10 vehicles by which to explain meaning. For example, Rashi could explain meaning based on the 1 and 2 letter roots of which the root was composed. Rashi believed in two sets of roots--for purposes of CONJUGATION Rashi believed in 3 letter roots; for purposes of MEANING Rashi believed in 2 letter roots. Here Rashi will explain the MEANING of a 3 letter root based on the meaning of the 2 terminal letters as well as the meaning of the initial letter. We call this the SUBRULE of 2-4 LETTER ROOTS. Another method that Rashi used to explain meaning is to contrast the nuances of words with similar meanings. We call this the Rashi subrule of SYNONYMS. EXAMPLE Gn37-25c ---------------- The Biblical text Gn37-25c states --------------------------------- ...they were carrying Nun-Caph-Tauv, Tzade-Resh-Yud, and Lamed-Tet --------------------------------- Rashi comments -------------------------------------- Nun-Caph-Tauv refers to a spice collection (Rashi cites another verse where this is so) -------------------------------------- Although Rashi does not explicitly state it, nevertheless the relation between CRUSHED and SPICES is obvious. We therefore have the following etymological derivation - The Hebrew root Caph-Tauv-Tauv means CRUSHED - Hebrew letter NUN means ALOT OF - Nun-Caph-Tauv=ALOT OF CRUSHED ITEMS = Perfume/spice collections Here Rashi uses the rule of 2-4 LETTER ROOTS The LIST910a below presents other examples where NUN means ALOT. Actually NUN can have several meanings all illustrated in that list: LOTS OF, CONSEQUENCE, INTENSE. EXAMPLE Gn37-25d Gn37-25e -------------------------- The Biblical Text states that --------------------------------- ...they carried spice collections ...Tzade-Resh-Yud and Lamed-Tet --------------------------------- Rashi comments that ------------------------------------- Tzade-Resh-Yud and Lamed-Tet are names of perfumes ------------------------------------- Again Rashi does not explicitly state it. But the meaning of the roots of Tzade-Resh-Yud and Lamed-Tet are well known - Tzae-Resh-Yud from root Tzade-Resh means TIGHTS perfume - Lamed-Tet from root Lamed-Tet means SECRET FRAGRANCE The TIGHTS and SECRET fragrances are names of perfumes in many languages. They represent two extremes in intimacy (SECRETIVE vs TIGHTS). LIST955a gives other examples of Rashis commenting on SYNONYM pairs. EXAMPLE Gn37-27a ---------------- The Biblical text states ---------------------------------------- And Judah said: There is no value in killing our brother---why not sell him instead to the Arabs: And the brothers HEARD ---------------------------------------- Rashi comments --------------------------------------- The Hebrew root Shin-Mem-Ayin can mean either - HEAR, FIND OUT, LISTEN or - ACCEPT an idea. In our verse we should translate it as ACCEPT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - And Judah said: There is no value in killing our brother---why not sell him instead to the Arabs: And the brothers ACCEPTED HIS ADVICE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------------------------------------ Rashi then brings about half a dozen verses and shows that the Aramaic translation uses the terms ACCEPT vs HEAR depending on context. LIST955a below gives other examples of pairs of words with similar meanings but subtle nuances differentiating them. | ||
ITEM | DETAIL | |
RASHI RULE CLASS: | WORD MEANING | |
RASHI SUBRULE CLASS: | 2 Letter semantic roots | |
RASHI WORKBOOK PRINCIPLE | #7 | |
SEE BELOW | LIST910a | |
ROOTS illustrating | NUN=alot, consequence, intense | |
----------------- | --------------------------------- | |
RASHI SUBRULE CLASS | SYNONYMS | |
SEE BELOW | LIST955a | |
List of | Synonym pairs-differ minutely |
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04 | |||||
ROOTS illustrating NUN=alot,consequence,intense | |||||
ROOT | MEANS | NUN MEANS | END | MEANS | |
Nun-Beth | HOLLOW | CHILD OF*8 | b | INSIDE | |
Nun-Zayin-Kuf | DAMAGE | CHILD OF | z-k | SPARKS | |
Nun-Mem-Resh | LEOPARD | CHILD OF | m-r | BRAZENNESS | |
Nun-Tzde-Lamd | SAVE | CHILD OF | z-l | SHADE | |
Nun-Kuph-Mem | REVENGE | CHILD OF | k-m | STANDING UP | |
Tauv-NUN-Caph | Earlobe | CHILD OF | T-Ch | INSIDE | |
Beth-Hey-NUN | Thumb | CHILD OF | B | INSIDE*9 | |
----------- | ------ | ----------- | --- | -------- | |
A-M-N | Nurse | Consequence of | A-M | Motherhood | |
Ch-L-N | Window | Consequence of | ChL | empty space | |
Ch M N | Sun-god | Consequence of | Chmh | sun | |
A D N | Happy | Consequence of | A-D | having extra | |
----------- | ------ | ----------- | --- | -------- | |
Sh N H | Sleep*5 | Lots of | Sh.. | Sh... sound*1 | |
D M N | Destroy | Lots of | D-M | silence | |
S Ch N | Abcess | Lots of(Very) | SCh | Low | |
S T N | Satan | Lots of | S-T | deviation | |
G-R-N | Granary | Lots of | G-R | harvest itms*2 | |
D-Sh-N | Plump | Lots of | D-S | growth*3 | |
A-N-F | Enraged | Lots of | A-F | Anger | |
N-K-T*11 | Spices | Lots of | K-T | Crushed items | |
----------- | ------ | ----------- | --- | -------- | |
YRyVN | Fight | Intensely | R-V | disputing*4*10 | |
B---N | between | Intensely | B-O | in | |
B-Ch-N | Test | Intensely | B-O | (look) into*5 | |
Ch ShN | Chshn*4 | Intensely | ChSh | feeling out*6 | |
S R N | Governor | Intense | S-R | Prince*7 | |
|
|||||
*1 This is onomatopoeia (word meaning by sound) Another (famous) Hebrew example is BAK-BOOK for BOTTLE (Water coming out of a bottle sounds like BAK-BOOK BAK BOOK) *2 A-G-R is said to mean GATHERING but more specifically refers to HARVESTING (eg. Dt28-39 -- you will not drink or harvest wine) *3 D-Sh-A refers to HERBIAGE -- minor field growth. A PLUMP/FAT person could be said that -------------------------------------- HIS field (stomach) IS GROWING WILDLY -------------------------------------- Note that D-Sh-N does frequently mean FAT Also note that FIELD can refer to STOMACH (Songs07-03) *4 Cf Ex21-18 If men FIGHT and one hits the other with a stone or a fist.... *5 Just like the English metaphor for TESTING/INVESTIGATION -- LETS LOOK INTO IT -- *6 The ChShN was one of the eight PRIESTLY garments. The ChShN held the URIM vTUMIM -- these were lettered ornaments with prophetic capacity. When the High Priest asked a question of God he would get the answer by having a vision of the ChShN with the letters answering his question lit up on the URIM. Hence the ChShN containing the URIM vTUMIM enabled the High Priest to FEEL OUT (ChSh) a case -- compare the similar English FEELING OUT A CASE *7 The word SRN refers both to the GOVERNOR as well as to the STATE over which he governs (Cf Joshua 13:3) SR by itself refers to any leader. Hence GOVERNOR (Srn) is an INTENSE (N) Leader (SR) or the PINACLE of LEADERSHIP *8 Throughout the Bible if you want to state that someone was KNOWN for something then you state that the person was the CHILD OF it. eg RIF RAFS are called CHILDS OF NO-NAME *9 Functionally, the THUMB opposes other fingers and enables humans to grasp objects. Hence the THUMB enables things to be held INSIDE ones hand | |||||
|
|||||
*10 Some scholars interpret a terminal NUN as indicating LESS -- but it should be clear from this example -- YRVN vs RV -- that a terminal NUN indicates INTENSITY (DISPUTE - FIGHT) *11 Gn37-25c |
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04 | ||||
List of Synonym pairs-differ minutely*1 | ||||
VERSE | WORD | BASIC IDEA | NUANCES | |
Gn37-27a | $M& | Hear | Accept*14 | |
Gn35-22 | $M& | Hear | Listen / Find out*14 | |
-------- | ------ | ---------- | ----------------------------- | |
Gn37-25d | CRI | Perfume | The TIGHTS perfume *13 | |
Gn37-25e | L@ | Perfume | SECRET fragrance *13 | |
-------- | ------ | ---------- | ----------------------------- | |
Dt28-63b | N-S-X | Remove | DRAG | |
-------- | @-Q-R | Remove | UPROOT | |
------- | ----- | --------- | ----- | |
Dt06-11a | ChTzV | Dig Pit | DIG pit IN STONE | |
Ex21-31a | PTaCH | Dig Pit | OPEN the pit(previously dug) | |
Ex21-31b | CaReH | Dig Pit | DIG the pit (CREATE it) | |
------- | ----- | --------- | ----- | |
Ex15-16a | AyMaH | Fear | ANXIETY(Long term fear)*12 | |
Ex15-16b | PaChaD | Fear | FEAR(Short term fear)*12 | |
------- | ----- | --------- | ----- | |
Ex05-07b | L-V-N | To Build | BRICKS used for building | |
Ex05-07a | T-V-N | To Build | STRAW used for building | |
------- | ----- | --------- | ----- | |
Ex01-07a | S-R-Tz | Reproduce | Reproduce alot*9 *11 | |
-------- | P-R-W | Reproduce | ||
-------- | R-B-W | Reproduce | ||
------- | ----- | --------- | ----- | |
Gn47-23a | HAY | HERE | I am giving this to you*8 | |
-------- | HNH | HERE | ||
------- | ----- | --------- | ----- | |
Gn43-28a | KiDaH | BOW | BOW | |
Gn43-28a | SaChaH | BOW | PROSTRATE | |
------- | ----- | --------- | ----- | |
Gn15-05a | NBT | SEE | To FACE a situation | |
-------- | RAH | SEE | ||
------- | ----- | --------- | ----- | |
Gn29-17b | TOAR | Good looks | Good FIGURE | |
Gn29-17c | MAREH | Good looks | Good LOOKS | |
------- | ----- | --------- | ----- | |
Lv15-03a | R-R | To SPILL | To OOZE out*1 | |
------- | $PK | To SPILL | ||
------- | ----- | --------- | ----- | |
Lv14-41a | YQTzA | To CUT | To SANDPAPER*2 | |
------- | KRT | To CUT | ||
------- | ----- | --------- | ----- | |
Lv11-35a | KIRaIM | STOVES | OVEN*3 | |
------- | T-N-R | Stove | ||
------- | ----- | --------- | ----- | |
Lv02-05a | MChVT | Pots | FRYING-PAN:Pot*4 | |
Lv02-07a | MRChST | Pots | FRYING-PAN:Pot*4 | |
------- | ----- | --------- | ----- | |
Lv13-02a | SAYTH | White | SNOW-WHITE:CLOUD-WHITE*5 | |
Lv13-02b | BHRT | White | SNOW-WHITE:CLOUD-WHITE*5 | |
------- | ----- | --------- | ----- | |
Dt24-06a | RChIM | Grindstone | Bottom vs Top Grindstone*6 | |
Dt24-06b | RCV | Grindstone | Top vs Bottom Grindstone*6 | |
------- | ----- | --------- | ----- | |
Ex31-18a | KIYOR | BASIN | Vat:Sprinkler*7 | |
|
||||
*1 This root occurs very infrequently We have - Lv15-03a oozing (RR) of sexual secretions - 1S21-14 (Spittle) - Jb06-06(Oozing of plants or spittle) *2 Thus YQTziA doesnt just refer to ANY CUTTING but rather to SANDPAPERING. Hence this root can also refer to CORNERS and EDGES (which get their distinctness from being SANDPAPERED) *3 I used an English analogy. Actually TNUR vs CIRaYIM seem to refer to a ONE-burner vs a TWO-Burner hot plate. I am not actually sure on all details*10 *4 Both of these are pots. One is shallow--the type used for frying. The other is deep--the type used for rich cooking*10 *5 These are two shades of white. I dont know if analogies exist in English (CLOUD-WHITE or SNOW-WHITE vs MARBLE WHITE)*10 *6 I dont believe English has technical terms for the TOP vs the Bottom grindstone*10 *7 Again there are no English words. The Kaph-Vuv-Resh refers to a VAT that can hold about 200 Gallons By contrast the Kaph-Yud-Vuv-Resh refers to a hugh TANK of water with faucet holes. This TANK was used to wash hands and legs in the temple (The water sprinkled out of the holes and washed the person) *8 HAY only occurs twice in the Bible (The other occurence is at Ez16-43). The difference between HAY and HINAY seems to be that - You use HINAY (HERE) when the object you are giving is actually there - You use HAY (HERE) when the object you are giving is not necessarily physically there but accessible. Hence since Joseph said HERE, I AM GIVING YOU SEED, and was referring to SEED he possessed (but not seed that he had immediately before him) we use the word HAY not HINAY. (This suggested difference is conjectural; there are verses with Hinay that would seem to contradict it--if so HAY and HINAY would simply be two synonyms with the same meaning) *9 So eg REPRODUCE and INSECTIFY both have the same basic meaning of HAVING CHILDREN. But INSECTIFY has the added nuance of having MANY CHILDREN | ||||
|
||||
*10 I believe Rashis basic thrust in all these verses is explaining items that are ALMOST similar in meaning but have some subtle nuance (Like STOVE OVEN). However Rashi goes further and gives etymologies of some of these words eg - SeAyTh = CLOUD WHITE (From NaSiH=cloud) - MaChaVath= FRYING PAN (Has a rim that HIDES(Cheth-Bet) - MaRCheSeth= Deep Cooking Pan(food BUBBLES (RaChSh)) - RCV=Top Grindstone that RIDES(RCV) on the other grindstone There are more etymologies; some of these have been discussed elsewhere. I believe these are the basic ones. *11 Rashi-s actual language is ----------------------------------------- S-R-Tz means to have 6 children at a time ----------------------------------------- The number 6 has sent the Rashi commentators into a frenzy. Some Rashi commentators derive the number 6 from the 6 verbs in Ex01-07 - (1) The Jews REPRODUCED - (2) and INSECTIFIED - (3) and MULTIPLIED - (4) and became HUMONGOUS - (5) ALOT - (6) ALOT However a simpler approach to Rashi is the following - The word INSECTIFY means HAVE CHILDREN LIKE INSECTS - So INSECTIFY means HAVE AS MANY CHILDREN AS YOU CAN - But the maxmimum children a woman can have is 6 - So Rashi-is-Simple *12 e.g. Gn15-12 Abraham had ANXIETY on the vision of what would happen to him over the next 400 years vs. Dt28-66 You will FEAR Day and NIGHT. (It is hard to prove exact nuances from the verses--it may be more precise to state that AYMAH is NON-SPECIFIC ANXIETY while PACHAD is SPECIFIC FEAR. This would be consistent with the etymology of AYMAH = AY MAH = WHERE IS IT? WHAT WILL HAPPEN -- that is, ANXIETY is a state of excessive concern on what will happen without being specific.) *13 SECRET FRAGRANCE and the TIGHTS are names of perfumes in English also. They represent two opposite approaches to intimacy (SECRETIVE vs TIGHTS). *14 Rashi brings about half a dozen verses where the Hebrew root Shin-Mem-Ayin can mean either HEAR or ACCEPT |
*#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc., 2004, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#*#*#
VERSE: Gn37-28a
RASHIS COVERED: Gn37-28a Gn37-28b Gn39-03a
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04 | |
SUCCINCT SUMMARY ---------------- One of Rashis 6 main goals is commenting on one verse by bringing material from an other verse. Sometimes two verses will seem to contradict each other. We call this the Rashi Rule of CONTRADICTION. Rashi had 4 methods of resolving contradiction. Sometimes Rashi will resolve a contradiction by looking at the two verses as two stages of one process. We call this the Rashi subrule of TWO-STAGES. Other times Rashi will resolve a contradiction by using broad vs literal interpretation of words. We call this the Rashi subrule of BROAD-LITERAL. EXAMPLE: Gn37-28a Gn37-28b -------------------------- The Biblical text states at Gn37-27:28, Gn37-36, and Gn39-01 ------------------------------------------------------------ Judah said: Why kill our brother. Rather let us sell him to the Arabs so we personally dont kill him and his brothers accepted this idea. A Midianite caravan passed: They lifted Joseph from the pit and sold him to the Arabs for 20 coins: And they brought Joseph to Egypt. And the Midianites sold him to Potifar in Egypt. And Joseph was brought to Egypt, and bought by Potifar from the Arabs. ------------------------------------------------------------ This is very confusing... - did the brothers sell him to Midianites or Arabs - did the Arabs or Midianites sell Joseph to Potifar Rashi comments ------------------------------------------------------ You have to understand the Biblical text as describing several stages of sale; Joseph was REPEATEDLY sold. ------------------------------------------------------ Based on Rashi I would read the Biblical text as describing 3 sales (not 2 as usually taken). In the text below we insert words in brackets that make the Rashi reading of the Biblical text smoother --------------------------------------------------- - A Midianite caravan passed: [BUT] - The [Brothers] lifted Joseph from the pit - and sold him to the Arabs for 20 coins: - And they [The Arabs] brought him [towards] Egypt - [But on the way the Arabs sold Joe to the Midianites] - And the Midianites sold him to Egypt - [To another band of Arabs] - [till he, Joseph, eventually ended up with Potifar] - Joseph was taken down to Egypt - Potifar bought him from the Arabs ---------------------------------------------------- So the Biblical text indicates 4 stages - initial sale to Arabs (Gn37-27:28) - Arab sale to Midianites (Gn37-28, Gn37-36) This is assumed to resolve Gn37-28, Gn37-36) - Midianite sale to other Arabs (Gn37-36,Gn39-01) This is assumed to resolve Gn37-36, Gn39-01 - Arab sale to Potifar (Gn39-01) At any rate, as one reads the various contradictions one can appreciate how Rashi tried to resolve them using the method of TWO-STAGES. LIST530a below presents other pairs of contradictory verses resolved by TWO-STAGES. | |
RASHI RULE CLASS: CONTRADICT | |
RASHI WORKBOOK PRINCIPLE #15 | |
SEE BELOW LIST530a | |
Verse pairs illustrating 2 stages t |
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04 | |||
Verse pairs illustrating 2 stages to a process | |||
VERSE-1 | VERSE-2 | HOW THE TWO TEXTS ARE COMBINED | |
Gn37-36 | Gn39-01 | Joe sold 4 times:Arabs to Midian to Arab to Egypt*13 | |
Nu05-08 | Nu05-08d | Tithes/Terumah to GOD; GOD gives them to PRIEST | |
Ex14-27 | Ex14-30a | Egypt drowns IN sea; then thrown ON sea-shore | |
Ex15-01 | Ex15-04 | Egyptians THROWN UP;THEN SHOT down to sea | |
Ex16-13 | Nu11-09 | 1st Dew bed; then MANNA; THEN dew blanket | |
Nu08-24 | Nu04-03 | Levites LEARN Temple at 25;THEN serve at 30 | |
Nu16-32 | Nu26-11a | Korach sons 1st punished; then repented*1 | |
Nu26-54 | Nu26-55a | Children inherit units;Parents give equally*10 | |
Lv21-10 | Lv16-32c | Priesthood succession: Lineage 1st;Merit 2nd*2 | |
|
|||
*1 Nu16-32 and Nu16-33 together imply that KORACH AND ALL FOLLOWING HIM DIED ALIVE BY FIRE AND EARTHQUAKE This contradicts Nu26-11 that the sons of Korach did not die Note that Psalms 45-49 were written by the SONS OF KORACH showing that they repented *2 In other words if one of the high priests sons is qualified for the position he is chosen. If not a non-descendant (who is qualified) is taken. Lv16-32c presents this SON-MERIT rule for priests Dt17-20c generalizes this SON-MERIT rule for Kings. This interpretation of the text is further clarified by the ALIGNMENT method.*11 Some further technicalities are noted in note *12 | |||
|
|||
*10 Here is a simple numerical example Assume 3 people in Egypt - Bob - Dan and David Brothers Assume - Bob has 1 child - Dan has 1 child - David has 2 children So GENERATION1(GEN1) has 3 units (Bob,Dan David) And GEN2 has 4 units (1+1+2) We now have 3 stages STAGE 1 ------- Each GEN2 person gets same number of units (Say 2 units) So Bobs child --2 units -- Dans child --2 units -- Davids-------4 units to 2 children STAGE 2 ------- Now the units are coalesced at the family (GEN1) level - Bob has 2 units(Since he has one child with 2 units) - Dan-David has 6 units (Dans child 2 units and Davids 4) STAGE 3 ------- - Bob gives his 2 units back to his child - Dan-David give there 6 units equally to children so -- Dans child receives 3 units -- Davids 2 children receive 1.5 units each (Total of 3) Here is a time map -------------------------------------------------------------- EGYPT(GEN1) CHILDREN STAGE1 STAGE2 STAGE3 -------------- ---------- ----------- ------------ ------------ Bob 1 child 2/8 2/8 2/8 @child Dan-brother 1 child 2/8 6/8 brothers 3/8 @child David-brother 2 child 4/8 6/8 Brothers 3/8 @2 child --------------------------------------------------------------- Although this may seem complicated it fulfills the 2 verses - The actual exodus people from Egypt inherit - The descendants determine inheritance *11 We align Lv21-10 Lv16-32 as follows ----------------------------------------------------------------- The priest --------------- ...annointed ...trained replace father The priest who is advanced ...annointed ...trained -------------- *a *b *c *d *b ----------------------------------------------------------------- As the double #b clearly shows there are two criteria - priest is advanced (bigger than his brothers) - priest replaces father These conflicting criteria are resolved using the RabbiIshmael method of 2 STAGES - if the son is qualified pick him - if not pick a qualified non-descendant *12 Interestingly heridatary appointment is mentioned by - Slaves (Lv25-41) - Kings (Dt17-20) - Priests (Dt18-05) - Levites (1C23-13) The Bible EXPLICITLY advances a LINEAGE-MERIT duality for priests (As shown above by the alignment presented in footnote #11). We generalize this to Kings (Rashi Dt17-20c). We do not apply this to slaves since merit is not involved We also do not generalize this to Levites since the Bible explicitly states that they replace the first-born and hence merit is no longer relevant (A qualified 1st born could NOT function as a Levite because the Bible states explicitly that they were replaced (See eg Nu03-40:43) *13 There are 4 texts involved as follows ---------------------------------------- Gn37-27 states idea of sale to ARabs Gn37-28 states Midianites passed but Joe sold to Arabas Gn37-36 states Midianites sold Joe to Potifar Gn39-01 states Arabs sold Joe to Potifar ----------------------------------------- Rashi (Gn37-28a Gn38-28b) resolves these contradictions by assuming 4 stages of sale: - Brothers to Arabs (Gn37-27) - Arabs to Midianites (Hinted at in Gn37-28) - Midianites to ARabs (resolving Gn37-36, Gn39-01) - Arabs to Egypt (Gn39-01) |
*#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc., 2004, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#*#*#
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04 | |||
Lighting summary of Rashis with emphasis on Rashi rules*10 | |||
# | LIST | BRIEF SUMMARY OF RASHI EMPHASIZING USE OF RASHI RULES | |
7 | 910a | NCT=alot(N) of crushed items(CTT)=PERFUME ASSORTMENTS | |
7 | 955a | $M&= a) To hear, listen b) To accept an idea | |
7 | 955a | CRI = TIGHTS perfumes vs L@ = SECRET FRAGRANCE (2 extremes) | |
15 | 530a | Joseph sold 4 times: Brothers--Arabs--Midian--Arabs--Egypt | |
|
|||
| |||
|
|||
*10 The explanation of the list should be clear - The first column gives the NUMBER of the RASHI RULE used All Rashi rules may be found with examples at http://wwww.Rashiyomi.com/workbook.htm - The second column gives the LIST ID (eg LIST210z) which contains many examples of a particular Rashi technique and includes the example presented in the third column - The third column gives a lightning summary of the Rashi with particular emphasis on the Rashi rule used. All lists may be found at http://www.Rashiyomi.com/lists.htm |
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04 | |||
| |||
VERSE | RULE | BRIEF DESCRIPTION | |
======== | =============== | ===================================== | |
Gn37-25c | WORD MEANINGS | HEAR=acept;CRUSHED=spices;SECRET pfrm | |
Gn37-25d | WORD MEANINGS | HEAR=acept;CRUSHED=spices;SECRET pfrm | |
Gn37-25e | WORD MEANINGS | HEAR=acept;CRUSHED=spices;SECRET pfrm | |
Gn37-27a | WORD MEANINGS | HEAR=acept;CRUSHED=spices;SECRET pfrm | |
Gn37-28a | CONTRADICTION | Joseph sold 4 times:Brother-Arab-Mdyn | |
Gn37-28b | CONTRADICTION | Joseph sold 4 times:Brother-Arab-Mdyn | |
Gn39-03a | CONTRADICTION | Joseph sold 4 times:Brother-Arab-Mdyn | |
--------- | ---------------- | ------------------------------------- |
*#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc., 2004, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#*#*#