*1 The phrase TEMPLEYARD or ALTAR clearly indicates that
even when coming to the TEMPLEYARD, in which the Altar
was situated

*2 The word TEMPLE by itself could mean in the HOLIES(actual
building of the TEMPLE). However the phrase
-------------------------------------
Before God, at Entrance of TempleYard
-------------------------------------
clearly has nuances of EVEN in the COURTYARD(by the
entrance).

Note that Lv10-09b does not use the phrase ENTRANCE TO TEMPLE
The Sifrah however argues as follows
------------------------------------------------------
We find the PRIEST CLOTHING OBLIGATION (Ex28-43c) applies
both to the TEMPLEYARD and TEMPLE BUILDING. It would
therefore stand to reason that the DRUNKEDNESS
PROHIBITION applies equally to the TEMPLEYARD and
TEMPLE BUILDING
------------------------------------------------------

*3 Note the contrast:
- Slaughter the ox by the ENTRANCE TO THE TEMPLEYARD
- bring the blood ---------------- TO THE TEMPLE
It would seem that in the BRING BLOOD VERSE, the
word TEMPLE means TEMPLE BUILDING. This is further
confirmed with what was done with the blood
-----------------------------------------------
- sprinkle the blood on the PAROCETH
-----------------------------------------------
Since the SPRINKLED BLOOD went on the PAROCETH
I infer that the blood was brought into the
Temple building proper.

*10 Some background will be helpful.

-- The list reflects  usage of metonomy--the naming
of parts by wholes and wholes by parts. Some well known
examples are
- day: 12 hour vs 24 hour
- honey: honey vs sweets
- bread: bread vs food
- man:   man vs person

- Hence the word TEMPLE could either refer to the
- entire Temple(Courtyard, Holies, and Holy of HOlies)
- Temple building (Holy and Holy of Holies)

-- In each of the verse examples we will indicate
thru the footnotes whether the word TEMPLE should
be translated as
- TEMPLEYARD (Entire temple) or
- TEMPLE (Temple Building proper)

The same Hebrew word is used throughout:
Aleph-Hey-Lamed Mem-Ayin-Vav-Dalet
(Ohel Moayd)

*1  Many people are familiar with the concept of the
FORMULA PLUG IN. That is a problem is solved by a
formula which you plug into.

But some problems intrinsically cannot (initally)
be solved by a formula. Instead you have to
formulate the problem algebraically and solve;only
then do you have the formula.

In other words these problems are solved by
the EQUATION vs the FORMULA

Thus the statement that the eldest gets double
suggests the following model.

- Suppose the are B brothers
- Suppose 1 of them is eldest
- The Fathers total assets are T (Total)

- Let A be the amount each brother inherits
We have no formula for A

- Then each of the B-1 brothers obtains A
- The eldest obtains double, 2A.
- Together this exhausts the Fathers estate, T

Hence we have (B-1)A + 2A = (B+1)A = T

This gives rise to the formula  A = T / (B+1)

An example is a father with 100,000 and 4 children
- T=100,000
- B=4
- So each child take T/(B+1) = 100000/5 = 20,000
- Eldest takes 2*20000=40000
- Other 3 take 20000
- Total distribution =3*20000+40000=100000

See Rambam Inheritance Chapter 2

*10 The explanation of the list should be clear
- The first column gives the NUMBER of the RASHI RULE used
All Rashi rules may be found with examples at
http://wwww.Rashiyomi.com/workbook.htm

- The second column gives the LIST ID (eg LIST210z) which
contains many examples of a particular Rashi technique and
includes the example presented in the third column

- The third column gives a lightning summary of the Rashi
with particular emphasis on the Rashi rule used.

All lists may be found at http://www.Rashiyomi.com/lists.htm