Rashi-Is-Simple Mailing List VISIT the RASHI DATABASE archives AT http://www.RashiYomi.com/ Surfing the Talmudic Seas (C) RashiYomi Incorporated, 2005 Written by Dr Russell Jay Hendel Volume 27 Number 22 For the WORD QUALITY HTML VERSION click here ----------------------------------- http://www.Rashiyomi.com/h26n22.htm ----------------------------------- Produced Nov 12 th, 2005 |
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04 | |||
| |||
HOW MUCH TIME DO YOU HAVE | WHAT SHOULD YOU READ | SECTION COLOR | |
Only 2-3 mintues | SUCCINT SUMMARY | BROWN | |
Only 5-8 minutes | LISTS | BROWN/BEIGE/BLUE | |
Maybe 20-30 minutes | BIG FOOTNOTE SECTION | GREEN SECTION | |
Time to do research | SUMMARY OVERVIEWS*2 | Newsletter Bottom | |
|
|||
*1 FIXED WIDTH FONTS are needed for the TEXT version For the HTML version you do not need to reset the browser For html or PDF version visit http://www.Rashiyomi.com/ris.htm *2 Each digest has two summary overviews on bottom: - LIGHTNING SUMMARIES (List of lists in this issue) - OVERVIEW (List of Rashis covered in this issue) |
*#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc., 2005, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#*#*#
VERSE: Gn12-06b
RASHIS COVERED: Gn12-06b Gn14-02e Gn12-08d Gn13-10e
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04 | ||
SUCCINCT SUMMARY ---------------- Rashi frequently makes powerful inferences from the ALIGNMENT, that is, the word by word comparison, of almost identical verses. The minor variations between these almost similar verses suggests nuances and differences or even meaning. We call this the Rashi rule of ALIGNMENT -When Rashi identifies two cases from the ALIGNMENT we call this the Rashi subrule of TWO CASES -When Rashi infers nuances from the variations between the almost similar verses (or verse phrases) we call this the Rashi subrule of NUANCES. -When Rashi infers MEANING from the ALIGNMENT of almost identical phrases we call this the Rashi SUBRULE of MEANING. EXAMPLE Gn14-02e --------------- Gn14-01:02 states ----------------------------------------------- In the days of AMRAFEL, King of SHINAR ARYOCH King of ELASAR KEDARLAOMER King of AYLAM THIDAL King of GOYIM They made war on BERA King of SEDOM BIRSHA King of AMORAH SHINAV King of ADMAH SHEMEVER King of TZEVOYIM --------------- ---------------- ------------ King of BELAH He was TZOAR *1 *2 *3 NOTES ----- *1 The NAME of the KING - for the last row is in column 3 - for the other rows is in column 1 (Rashi Gn14-02e) *2 The title King is - for the last row in Column 1 - for the other rows in Column 2 *3 The Country name is - for the last row in column 2 - for the other rows in column 3 Rashi does not explain the reasons for these differences on this verse. However Rashi does explain the reasons on Gn13-10e. There Rashi uses the CLIMAX rule to show that BELA was a LAND OF THE YOUNG. It is not surprising that the Kings name was YOUNG. It was the land of the YOUTH. The Hebrew word BELA means DEVOUR---as is well known excessive YOUTHFUL activity leads to being DEVOURED and early death. This criss-crossing of Rashis (The explanation of the ALIGNMENT of Gn14-02e occurs on Gn13-10e) is characteristic. LIST309d below summarizes this alignment SUCCINCT SUMMARY ---------------- Rashi frequently made inferences based on the Biblical STYLE. We call this Rashi Rule the RABBI ISHMAEL STYLE rule. A powerful style rule was the painting of a verse in a CLIMACTIC DEVELOPMENT manner. We call this the RASHI SUBRULE of CLIMAX EXAMPLE Gn13-10e ---------------- Gn13-10 talks about a climate that encourages love-making ------------------------------ And Lot saw the whole Jordan valley - it was full of drink (Rashi: Well irrigated) - ...LIKE a Garden of God (Rashi: Known for trees) - LIKE Egype (Rashi: Known for its field produce) - Coming to YOUTH's kingdom (cf Gn14-02) ------------------------------- In summary the verse describes this valley as ---------- - rivers - trees - fields - YOUTH ---------- The CLIMAX is unmistakable. It was a land encouraging love-making and the activities of YOUTH (Rashi accuses Lot of wanting this land for the opportunities of love-making). In passing those who have taken advanced art courses know that the typical BACKGROUND to a love scene is precisely that indicated by Gn13-10: RIVERS-TREES-FIELDS-YOUTH. In fact we can explain WHY the above 4 suggest love-making ----------------------------------------- - Rivers:EXPLANATION: Emotions of LOVE resemble the shimmers of water more than solid land - TREES:EXPLANATION:(a) Provides needed privacy (b) Well known erection symbols - FIELDS:EXPLANATION:(a) Provides a soft "bed" (b) Zephyred fields resemble the pulsations of love - YOUTH:EXPLANATION:Love is more vigorous when Young ------------------------------------------- Notice how we have combined - the CLIMAX of Gn13-10 - the ALIGNMENT of Gn14-02 - We can add the OFFER of Lot's daughters to the Sedom herd. Thus what we have here is not a homily of the sages but rather the simple meaning of the text---for it is the Biblical text that emphasizes - that DEVOUR(BELA) was ruled by King YOUTH - that Lot liked RIVERS-TREES-FIELDS-YOUTH The Chazalian reaction ---------------------------- Lot chose the cities for sex ---------------------------- is not midrashic, homiletic nor fancy. It is rather the simple meaning of the text! LIST109u below summarizes this argument. SUCCINT SUMMARY --------------- The ALIGNMENT rule is closely related to the FORMATTING rule EXAMPLE Gn12-06b Gn12-08d ------------------------- Gn12-06:08 states ----------------------------------------------------- And Abraham passed - by the land - until the place of Schem - until Elon Moreh - .... - Towards the mountain built an altar *1 *2 *3 ------------------------------------------------------ The verses list a sequence of places that Abraham visited. The places are listed in column 3. Note however the differences in column 2 - ELON MOREH is stated by itself - SCHEM is qualified as the PLACE of Schem. - The act of BUILDING AN ALTAR is mentioned by the mountain. Rashi chose to comment on the word PLACE. Rashi does NOT comment because the word is extra---rather Rashi comments because of the ALIGNMENT which places emphasis on the word. It is impossible to understand Rashi without consulting the Radack who shows that one of meanings of the Hebrew word MAKOM (Place) is GOD because GOD IS THE PLACE OF THE WORLD. Combining Radack and Rashi we can bring several ---------------------------------------------- verses where PLACE means GOD/TEMPLE/PRAYER - Es04-14 Jews will be helped from another HOLY person - Ez03-12 Bless be God from his TEMPLE - Gn28-11 And he prayed at the HOLY PLACE(Moriah) - Gn12-06b Abe passed to the HOLY place of Schem -------------------------------------------------- Rashi (paraphrased) ------------------------------------- They called SCHEM Holy because of the HOLY war declared by 2 brothers on the entire city of Schem for the rape of Dinah ------------------------------------- Again Rashi's derivation here is not Midrashic but rather based - on several precedents where PLACE means HOLY PLACE - on the ALIGNMENT which places EMPHASIS on PLACE LIST309e summarizes this argument. LIST811k summarizes the verses where PLACE means HOLY SUCCINCT SUMMARY ---------------- The FORMATTING rule seeks to explain Rashis based on the FORMATTING of the Biblical text. FORMATTING techniques in modern writing include use of bold, italics,underline, bullets, paragraph indentation and similar items. The Bible indicated FORMATTING using its own techniques: For example - the Bible indicates bold,italics, underline thru REPETITION - the Bible indicates bulleting, thru REPEATING keywords The Bible can also indicate formatting thru meaning without any formal structure. We revisit the Gn12-06:08 which we just studied using the ALIGNMENT rule. Gn12-06:08 states ----------------------------------------------------- And Abraham passed - by the land - until the place of Schem - until Elon Moreh - .... - Towards the mountain built an altar *1 *2 *3 ------------------------------------------------------ Now we have already established that PLACE of SCHEM refers to the HOLY place of Schem. Rashi further explains that Abraham prayed there (Because he was a prophet) that the Jews should be victorious in avenging the rape of Dinah. The above derivation comes from ALIGNMENT which places an emphasis on the word PLACE. But now we can apply the FORMATTING rule. Each clause in the above paragraph lists one place where Abraham journeyed. If one of these clauses speaks about the Prayers that Abraham offered thru prophecy then according to the FORMATTING rule we are justified in seeing all the phrases as speaking about the prayers that Abraham offered based on prophecy. Hence the Rashi ---------------------------------- Rashi prayed there concerning the sin of Achan which happened in that place (See Jo07) ---------------------------------- LIST107t summarizes these arguments. The reader should notice the delicate intertwining of Rashis. To explain one verse Gn12-06:08 we needed to use - ALIGNMENT - supported by WORD MEANING - and then FORMATTING To explain Gn14-01:02 we needed to use - ALIGNMENT - followed by CLIMAX Therefore this is a peach of an example by which to show the method of Rashi interrelationships. | ||
ITEM | DETAIL | |
RASHI RULE CLASS: | ALIGNMENT | |
RASHI SUBRULE CLASS | NUANCES | |
RASHI WORKBOOK PRINCIPLE | #11 | |
SEE BELOW | LIST309d | |
Alignment of clauses in | Gn14-01:02 (list of Kings/Countries) | |
----------------------- | ---------------------------------- | |
RASHI RULE CLASS: | BULLET/PARAGRAPHS | |
RASHI SUBRULE CLASS | PARAGRAPH STRUCTURE | |
RASHI WORKBOOK PRINCIPLE | #26 | |
SEE BELOW | LIST107u | |
PARAGRAPH structure of | Gn13-10e-RIVER-TREE-FIELD-YOUTH=LOVE | |
----------------------- | ---------------------------------- | |
RASHI RULE CLASS: | WORD MEANINGS | |
RASHI SUBRULE CLASS | NAMING BY VERSES | |
RASHI WORKBOOK PRINCIPLE | #7 | |
SEE BELOW | LIST811k | |
List of verses with word | PLACE meaning HOLY PLACE | |
----------------------- | ---------------------------------- | |
RASHI SUBRULE CLASS | NUANCES | |
RASHI WORKBOOK PRINCIPLE | #11 | |
SEE BELOW | LIST309e | |
Alignment of clauses in | Gn12-06:08(Israel places Abe visited) | |
----------------------- | ---------------------------------- | |
RASHI RULE CLASS: | BULLET/PARAGRAPHS | |
RASHI SUBRULE CLASS | PARAGRAPH STRUCTURE | |
RASHI WORKBOOK PRINCIPLE | #26 | |
SEE BELOW | LIST107t | |
PARAGRAPH structure of | Gn12-06:08(Abe prays for future) |
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04 | |||
PARAGRAPH structure of Gn13-10e-RIVER-TREE-FIELD-YOUTH=LOVE | |||
STAGE | Text of Verse | RASHI | |
rivers*1 | it was full of DRINK | Well irrigated | |
trees*2 | ...LIKE a Garden of God | Known for trees*5 | |
fields*3 | LIKE Egype (Rashi: | Known for fields*5 | |
YOUTH*4 | Coming to YOUTH's land | *4 | |
|
|||
*1 The emotions of love resemble WATER more than land. *2 Trees afford privacy for love-making and are well known erection symbols. *3 Fields provide soft "beds"; a zephyred field resembles the pulsations of love-making *4 see http://www.Rashiyomi.com/#list309d. The ALIGNMNET of the 9 Kings mentioned in Gn14-01:02 emphasizes that KING YOUTH reigned over the DEVOUR land; people died YOUNG because they were involved in excessive love-making.*10 *5 Note the repeated LIKE in the text of the verse. This creates a BULLET like affect. The BULLETS emphasize each distinctive phrase. Hence - The Garden of Eden was known for its trees (Cf Gn02-08:15) - Egypt was known for its field produce (Cf Ex09-31:32) | |||
|
|||
*10 The CLIMAX is unmistakable. It was a land encouraging love-making and the activities of YOUTH (Rashi accuses Lot of wanting this land for the opportunities of love-making). In passing those who have taken advanced art courses know that the typical BACKGROUND to a love scene is precisely that indicated by Gn13-10: RIVERS-TREES-FIELDS-YOUTH. |
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04 | |||
PARAGRAPH structure of Gn12-06:08(Abe prays for future) | |||
PHRASE#1 | PHRASE#2 | PHRASE#3 | |
Abraham passed | |||
- by | the | land | |
- until | the place of | Schem | |
- until | Elon Moreh | ||
- .... | |||
- | Towards the mountain | ||
built an altar | |||
*1 | *2 | *3 | |
|
|||
*1 The NAME of the KING - for the last row is in column 3 - for the other rows is in column 1 (Rashi Gn14-02e)*10 *2 The title King is - for the last row in Column 1 - for the other rows in Column 2 *3 The Country name is - for the last row in column 2 - for the other rows in column 3 |
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04 | |
Alignment of clauses in Gn14-01:02 (list of Kings/Countries) | |
In the days of | |
ARYOCH King of ELASAR | |
KEDARLAOMER King of AYLAM | |
THIDAL King of GOYIM | |
They made war on | |
BERA King of SEDOM | |
BIRSHA King of AMORAH | |
SHINAV King of ADMAH | |
SHEMEVER King of TZEVOY | |
--------------- ---------------- ------ | |
King of BELAH He was | |
*1 *2 *3 | |
|
|
*1 The NAME of the KING - for the last row is in column 3 - for the other rows is in column 1 (Rashi Gn14-02e) *2 The title King is - for the last row in Column 1 - for the other rows in Column 2 *3 The Country name is - for the last row in column 2 - for the other rows in column 3 | |
|
|
*10 Rashi uncharacteristically does not give a reason for these differences. He rather notes them. But reviewing the meaning of the names of the KING and COUNTRY - BELA means to DEVOUR - TZOAR means YOUNG If the Biblical verse reverses itself and places the name of the country first perhaps there is an emphasis -------------------------------------- The King of the Country DEVOUR, which DEVOURed its inhabitants with sickness, had the name YOUNG for all inhabitants of that country died YOUNG (Perhaps that is why they were willing to fight-- they expected to die and had nothing to live for) -------------------------------------- |
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04 | |||
Alignment of clauses in Gn12-06:08(Israel places Abe visited) | |||
PHRASE#1 | PHRASE#2 | PHRASE#3 | |
Abraham passed | |||
- by | the | land | |
- until | the place of | Schem | |
- until | Elon Moreh | ||
- .... | |||
- | Towards the mountain | ||
built an altar*1 | |||
|
|||
*1 In list http://www.Rashiyomi.com/h27n22.htm#LIST309e we have already established that PLACE of SCHEM refers to the HOLY place of Schem. Rashi further explains that Abraham prayed there (Because he was a prophet) that the Jews should be victorious in avenging the rape of Dinah. The above derivation comes from ALIGNMENT which places an emphasis on the word PLACE. But now we can apply the FORMATTING rule. Each clause in the above paragraph lists one place where Abraham journeyed. If one of these clauses speaks about the Prayers that Abraham offered thru prophecy then according to the FORMATTING rule we are justified in seeing all the phrases as speaking about the prayers that Abraham offered based on prophecy. Hence the Rashi ---------------------------------- Rashi prayed there concerning the sin of Achan which happened in that place (See Jo07) ---------------------------------- |
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04 | ||
List of verses with word PLACE meaning HOLY PLACE | ||
VERSE | TRANSLATION OF VERSE WITH place TRANSLATED as HOLY | |
- Es04-14 | Jews will be helped from another HOLY*1 person*10 | |
- Ez03-12 | Bless be God from his TEMPLE*2 | |
- Gn28-11 | And he prayed at the HOLY PLACE*3(Moriah) | |
- Gn12-06b | Abe passed to the HOLY*4 place of Schem | |
|
||
*1 Radack translates PLACE as GOD. But a closer examination of the texts shows that PLACE means the HOLY PLACE, THE TEMPLE (Where of course one frequently prays). See the the other footnotes *2 The translation of PLACE as the HOLY TEMPLE makes sense and fits in here. *3 The interpretation here of PLACE as meaning HOLY PLACE vs ORDINARY PLACE is because of the repeated word PLACE. REPETITION encourages rare interpretations. See http://www.Rashiyomi.com/gn47-02a.htm Note that Jacob had passed by the mountain where Isaac his father was Akaydahed---consequently this place was HOLY. *4 Rashi states HE PRAYED THERE. We do not differ from Rashi however we point out that BECAUSE the verse emphasizes that Abraham came to the HOLY Schem, there is an emphasis on the HOLY war faught there to avenge the rape of Dinah--it then makes sense (as an AFTERTHOUGHT) that he prayed there. The main emphasis is that Abraham stopped in Schem because he prophetically new of the HOLY WAR that would take place there. | ||
|
||
*10 Radack seems to be an "orphan" among Rishonim. Yeshiva students get excited about other Rishonim--a sharp Rambam, an innovative Tosafoth, a clear RAN--but who even cares about the Radack. This is wrong. An affectionate play on his name states -------------------------------------------------- All need the owner of WHEAT(Radacks last name was WHEAT) -------------------------------------------------- We owe to Radack the observation that the Midrashic identification of PLACE and HOLINESS was not a homiletic accident but rather one of the SIMPLE MEANINGS of the text. The citation in Esther comes directly from him It is ironic that without this Radack Rashi and all the Talmudic sages appear to be making homilys and wild-out Midrashim. It is the Radack who exposes these midrashim as the simple meaning of the text. ------------------------------------------------ Praise be Him who Chose Them and Their Learning! ------------------------------------------------ |
*#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc., 2005, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#*#*#
VERSE: Gn13-07a
RASHIS COVERED: Gn13-07a Gn13-14a
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04 | ||
SUCCINT SUMMARY: ---------------- One of Rashis 10 main goals is the explanation of grammar similar to the explanations we find in modern textbooks. We call this the Rashi rule of GRAMMAR. In todays posting we deal with the grammatical rules governing DEVELOPMENT in paragraphs and chapters: Given a paragraph or chapter THEME, what types of sentences can exist in that paragraph or chapter and what are their relations to the central theme? We call this the rashi subrule of CONSECUTIVE PARAGRAPHS. Rashi knew 4 means of relating consecutive sentences or consecutive paragraphs in a paragraph or chapter: - CAUSE - CONTRAST - ENABLEMENT - UNIFYING THEME. Today we study the CAUSAL submethod. EXAMPLE 1: Gn13-07 ------------------ Gn13-07 states ------------------------------------------------ There was an [ongoing] dispute between Abraham's shepards and Lot's shepards - the Canaanite and Prizites were still in the land ------------------------------------------------ Rashi explains the two clauses as CAUSAL -------------------------------------------- BECAUSE the Canaanites were still in the land therefore the land of Israel,that was promised to Abraham, did not yet belong to him. Thus Abraham abstained from grazing in their land. But Lot felt that since the land would eventually belong to Abraham therefore he had the right to graze in the land now -------------------------------------------- Rashi's contention that the two clauses are related CAUSALLY is supported by the following verse - Gn13-14a --------------------------------- And God spoke to Abraham AFTER Lot separated from him ...I will give you this land --------------------------------- Thus Rashi's interpretation of causality in Gn13-07 is reinforced by the more blatant causality in Gn13-14. LIST061a below presents other paragraph sequences with a CAUSAL connection. | ||
ITEM | DETAIL | |
RASHI RULE CLASS: | GRAMMAR | |
RASHI SUBRULE CLASS: | CONSECUTIVE CHAPTERS | |
RASHI WORKBOOK PRINCIPLE | #9 | |
SEE BELOW | LIST061a | |
A list of paragraphs | having a CAUSAL connection |
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04 | |||
A list of paragraphs having CAUSAL connection | |||
VERSE | TOPIC IN 1st CHAPTER | TOPIC IN 2nd CHAPTER | |
------- | -------------------- | -------------------------- | |
Gn13-14a | Lot / Abe separate | God promises Abe Israel*9 | |
Gn13-07a | Fight of Abe-Lot | Canaanites still in Israel*9 | |
------- | -------------------- | -------------------------- | |
Dt14-01a | Jews=Gods children | No self multilation on death | |
Dt01-42a | God not with you | Hence:defeat;therefore:no go | |
Nu30-16b | Annuls after AFFIRM | He bears punishment of sin*8 | |
Ex14-25a | Remove wheel | Heavy driving--God fights | |
Ex14-25b | Heavy Driving | God fights*10 | |
Ex13-17b | Avoid NEAR-ROUTE | Nearness facilitates return | |
Gn35-01a | Dinah is raped | Prophetic order to leave*6 | |
Gn33-13c | Young Sheep | IF pushed they will die*7 | |
Gn29-01a | God WITH Jacob | Jacob travelled SMOOTHLY*5 | |
Nu06-02a | Adulterous wife rite | Nazaarite from wine*1 | |
Gn38-01a | Brothers sell Joseph | Judah leaves brothers*1 | |
Gn23-03c | Abraham offers Isaac | Sarah dies*1 | |
Gn02-20a | Adam Eve are Naked | Snake gives Eve Apple*2 | |
Lv10-02a | Non-allowed sac | Death of Aarons sons*3 | |
Lv10-02a | Death of Aarons sons | No wine to serving priest*3 | |
Lv10-03d | Death of Righteous | God honored*4 | |
Lv22-15a | Dont eat Terumah | Dont DESCECRATE holies | |
|
|||
*1 Thus "whoever see the humiliating Adulterous wife rite" will be so shocked that he will abstain from wine Similarly "Judah advised his brothers to sell Joseph" and so when they regretted it they blaimed him and he had to "separate from them." Similarly "Sarah died" from the shock that "Abraham offered Isaac." *2 In other words because the snake saw Adam and Eve naked therefore he became Jealous and wanted Adam killed so he could marry Eve. ALthough this sounds a bit wild there is strong supporting evidence. Gn04-01 uses the past perfect form And Adam HAD BEEN FAMILIAR with his wife & they had a child" So the sequence of chapters is Adam was lonely God makes Eve Adam and Eve are naked ------------------------"Snake tempts Eve" Adam has a child with Eve Thus the sequence of chapters (Naked--->child) is clearly interrupted by the Snake story. *3 As explained above Rashi sees these two views as complementary - First they drank wine and got drunk - While drunk they thought it permissable to offer sacrifices which should not be offered Hence they died for both crimes *4 Rashi explains the Causal connection - when the masses see that God EVEN kills the righteous for sins - then they are aware how they must also observe Gods commandments - This leads to more honor for God *5 So GOOD NEWS facilitates/causes SMOOTH TRAVEL(Rashi) *6 The full sequence of chapters is as follows -------------------------------------------- - Gn31 God orders Jacob to return to his fathers house - Gn32 But Jacob is afraid of Being with Brother Esauv - Gn33 Jacob journeys instead to Succoth - Gn34 Dinah gets raped - Gn35 God tells Jacob to return to BethEl ------------------------------------------- Rashi notes that ----------------------------- If Jacob had IMMEDIATELY fulfilled the order of Travelling to his fathers house he wouldnt have stayed in Succoth and his Daughter would not have gotten raped. ------------------------------ Thus Rashi sees a CAUSAL connection between the chapters. Dinah was raped because Jacob did not IMMEDIATELY fulfill the prophetic order. Note Rashi expresses the same theme ------------------------------------------------- Because he delayed doing the prophecy immediately therefore he was punished that certain bad occurrences happened to him ------------------------------------------------- Rashi expresses this same theme on Gn35-22a where we find that Reuven inteferred with his fathers marital life. *7 Rashi can be better understood with the EXPORT-IMPORT LAW of logic. The EXPORT-IMPORT law states that ---------------------------------------------------- IF [it rains] then if [I go out] THEN [I will get wet] ---------------------------------------------------- has the same meaning as ---------------------------------------------------- IF [it rains] and [I go out] THEN [I will get wet] ---------------------------------------------------- In other words Rashi identifies the two sentence forms - IF p THEN IF q THEN r - IF p & q THEN r This identification of NESTED CONDITIONALS with a CONJUNCTIVE HYPOTHESIS is called the EXPORT-IMPORT law. The actual Biblical text reads --------------------------------------------- The cattle is young AND they will be pushed one day AND they will die --------------------------------------------- Rashi simply points out (Using EXPORT-IMPORT) that we can interpret this as either --------------------------------------------- [IF] The cattle is young AND they will be pushed one day THEN they will die --------------------------------------------- or --------------------------------------------- IF The cattle is young IF they will be pushed one day THEN they will die --------------------------------------------- The above two translations use the well known Biblical principle that the Hebrew letter VAV can refer to any connective. *8 In other words he - 1st affirmed a vow of his wife - then annuled it (which he had no right to) - If she now sins (Because she was mislead into thinking the vow is annuled) - then HE bears the sin/punishment In other words BECAUSE he misled her he must pay for the sin. *9 The causality of these verses reinforce each other - Gn13-14 EXPLICITLY states that God promised Abe Israel AFTER Lot separated from him - Gn13-07 states that Abe and Lot faught WHILE the Canaanites were still in the land. So Rashi simply puts the two verses together - Lot felt HE COULD USE ISRAEL land even though the CANAANITES still owned it. Lot felt this way because the land was promised to Abraham eventually. By contrast Abraham refused to use the land UNTIL it was actually given to him. | |||
|
|||
*10 Rashi also states -------------------------------------------------- The HEAVY DRIVING (that God made the Egyptians do by removing chariot wheel) was a punishment for their making HEAVY their hearts -------------------------------------------------- I would strengthen these associations -------------------------------------------------- The HEAVY DRIVING is a punishment for the HEAVY work that the Egyptians placed on the Jews -------------------------------------------------- These comments of Rashi or me also indicate -- HEAVY DRIVING causes/facilitated -- Egyptians seeing that God was fighting for them Indeed: We know that one of the way God fights is to punish people according to what they have done (See Rashi on Ex18-11- Jethro said: Now I know that God is the true God because He returns to people what they have done) Hence this particular punishment (making the Egyptians drive heavy vs killing them) showed the Egyptians (CAUSED them to be aware) that God was fighting. |
*#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc., 2005, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#*#*#
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04 | |||
Lighting summary of Rashis with emphasis on Rashi rules*10 | |||
# | LIST | BRIEF SUMMARY OF RASHI EMPHASIZING USE OF RASHI RULES | |
9 | 061a | God only promisd Abe Israel AFTER lot left.Lot felt land his now | |
11 | 309d | Person King of Land, Person King of Land & King of Land, Person | |
26 | 107t | RIVERS-TREES-FIELDS-YOUTH,King of DEVOUR--Lot wanted Love-making | |
11 | 309e | Abe went TO ELON-MOREH,TO holy SCHEM(holy war on Dinah's rape) | |
7 | 811k | Four verses where PLACE=HOLY PLACE-Praise be God from Holy Place | |
26 | 107u | Abraham prophetically knew each places future and prayed there | |
|
|||
| |||
|
|||
*10 The explanation of the list should be clear - The first column gives the NUMBER of the RASHI RULE used All Rashi rules may be found with examples at http://wwww.Rashiyomi.com/workbook.htm - The second column gives the LIST ID (eg LIST210z) which contains many examples of a particular Rashi technique and includes the example presented in the third column - The third column gives a lightning summary of the Rashi with particular emphasis on the Rashi rule used. All lists may be found at http://www.Rashiyomi.com/lists.htm |
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04 | |||
| |||
VERSE | RULE | BRIEF DESCRIPTION | |
======== | =============== | ===================================== | |
Gn13-07a | GRAMMARR | God promisd Abe Israel AFTER Lot left | |
Gn13-14a | GRAMMARR | God promisd Abe Israel AFTER Lot left | |
Gn12-06b | ALIGNMENT | RIVER-TREE-FIELD-YOUTH,King of DEVOUR | |
Gn14-02e | ALIGNMENT | RIVER-TREE-FIELD-YOUTH,King of DEVOUR | |
Gn12-08d | ALIGNMENT | RIVER-TREE-FIELD-YOUTH,King of DEVOUR | |
Gn13-10e | ALIGNMENT | RIVER-TREE-FIELD-YOUTH,King of DEVOUR | |
--------- | ---------------- | ----------------------------------- |
*#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc., 2005, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#*#*#