Rashi-Is-Simple Mailing List VISIT the RASHI DATABASE archives AT http://www.RashiYomi.com/ Surfing the Talmudic Seas (C) RashiYomi Incorporated, 2005 Written by Dr Russell Jay Hendel Volume 28 Number 8 For the WORD QUALITY HTML VERSION click here ----------------------------------- http://www.Rashiyomi.com/h28n8.htm ----------------------------------- Produced Dec 23, 2005 |
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04 | |||
| |||
HOW MUCH TIME DO YOU HAVE | WHAT SHOULD YOU READ | SECTION COLOR | |
Only 2-3 mintues | SUCCINT SUMMARY | BROWN | |
Only 5-8 minutes | LISTS | BROWN/BEIGE/BLUE | |
Maybe 20-30 minutes | BIG FOOTNOTE SECTION | GREEN SECTION | |
Time to do research | SUMMARY OVERVIEWS*2 | Newsletter Bottom | |
|
|||
*1 FIXED WIDTH FONTS are needed for the TEXT version For the HTML version you do not need to reset the browser For html or PDF version visit http://www.Rashiyomi.com/ris.htm *2 Each digest has two summary overviews on bottom: - LIGHTNING SUMMARIES (List of lists in this issue) - OVERVIEW (List of Rashis covered in this issue) |
*#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc., 2005, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#*#*#
VERSE: Gn38-08a
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04 | ||
SUCCINCT SUMMARY ---------------- A powerful but simple Rashi method is the CITATION or CROSS- REFERENCING of an OTHER VERSE for the purpose of adding FURTHER DETAILS to a verse we are studying. We call this the OTHER VERSE method. There are three submethods to the OTHER VERSE method. If the verse actually CITES or refers to an OTHER VERSE we call this the SUBMETHOD of CITATION. If the OTHER VERSE explains the meaning of some term in the first verse we call this the SUBMETHOD of MEANING. If the first verse does not cite an other verse and if no meaning is explained then we call this the SUBMETHOD of FURTHER DETAILS since the 2nd verse either confirms the first verse or typically adds FURTHER DETAILS to the first verse EXAMPLE 1: Gn38-08a ------------------------------------- Judah's first son died without children. In Gn38-08 Judah tells his second son ----------------------------------- Marry your sister in law and YABAM her and thereby PERPETUATE HIS FAMILY NAME ----------------------------------- Rashi explains the capped phrases YABAM and PERPETUATE HIS FAMILY NAME by cross referencing Dt25-05:10. Particularly Dt25-05:06 clarifies Gn38-08a ------------------------------------- If two brothers dwell together one of them dies without children then the sister in law cannot marry out Rather her brother in law marries and YABAMs her And the brother becomes like a firstborn [who inherits double] he inherits his portion and the portion of his brother so that his brothers name is not erased -------------------------------------- LIST210x presents other examples of verse pairs illuminating each other with further details | ||
ITEM | DETAIL | |
RASHI RULE CLASS | OTHER VERSES | |
RASHI SUBRULE CLASS | FURTHER DETAILS | |
RASHI WORKBOOK PRINCIPLE | #1 | |
SEE BELOW | LIST210x | |
List of verses pairs | with one verse illuminating another |
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04 | ||||
List of verses pairs with one verse illuminating another LIST210x CONTINUES LIST210a LIST210z LIST210y | ||||
VERSE | TEXT OF VERSE | OTHER VRSE | DETAILS | |
Gn38-08a | YABAM his brother | Dt25-05:06 | Marry sister in law | |
Gn29-13d | He told him THESE things | Gn27-41:45 | Why he fled/left*5 | |
Gn26-01a | Dont go down to Egypt | Gn12-10 | Same order to Abe | |
Gn25-05a | Abe gave Isac ALL HE HAD | Gn26-03:04 | Gave Gods blessings | |
Gn24-66a | ALL THINGS THAT HAPPENED | Gn24-10:21 | Immediately found it | |
Dt33-21a | He chose the FIRST | Nu32-01:05 | 1st Conquest-Moab | |
Dt33-21b | LAWGIVER is hidden there | Dt34-05:06 | MOSES buried there | |
Dt33-21c | Lawgiver is HIDDEN there | Dt34-05:06 | NoOne knows burial | |
------- | --------------------- | -------- | ---------------- | |
Dt32-14k | ...RED wine | Pr23-31 | the BEST wine | |
Dt18-09a | Dont learn idolatry | Dt12-30 | Dont learn TO DO*4 | |
Dt02-15a | God quick to kill siners | Nu32-05:08 | Bad influence*3 | |
Dt01-31b | God like FATHER to Jews | Ex14-19 | Angel goes in back | |
Nu27-20a | give your SPLENDOR ToHim | Ex34-30 | HORNS OF LIGHT | |
Nu21-15b | TZUR=Midyan family HEAD | Nu31-08 | 1 of 5 main leaders | |
Nu21-15c | TZUR=MIDYAN FAMILY head | Gn25-04 | 5 main Midyan tribes | |
Nu21-24a | BRAZEN is border of Amon | Dt02-19 | PROTECTED BY PROPHCY | |
Nu20-16b | God sent ANGEL to redeem | Ex23-20 | ANGEL=MOSES | |
Nu14-25a | journey away from here | Nu14-42:45 | Amalyk will defeat u | |
Nu12-08c | See GODS PICTURE | Ex33-23 | See God-s back | |
Nu12-12b | Don-t make us LIKE DEAD | Lv13-45:46 | LIKE LEPOR*1 | |
Nu02-02c | OPPOSITE the Temple | Jo03-04 | 2000 Cubits | |
Lv27-10a | GOOD:BAD sacrifice | Lv22-18:20 | BAD=BLEMISHED | |
Gn45-18a | I-ll give BEST OF LAND | Gn47-11 | BEST OF LAND=Ramsyth | |
|
||||
*1 Unlike other cases of ritual impurity the Lepor is - ostracized from all his friends - must declare himself impure and separate himself Hence he is like someone dead (that is like a dead body he is REPULSIVE)*10 *2 Verse Ex14-19 states -------------------------------------------- [The Jews had just exited Egypt; Egypt regretted letting them free and pursued them. The following text relates the pursuit] And the Angel of God, which went in FRONT of the Jewish camp, journeyed and went in BACK of them;[Similarly] the pillar of fire went from in front to the back -------------------------------------------- Rashi explains with an analogy: ----------------------------------------- A person and his father were walking in the forest. Suddenly they hear wild animals in back of them pursuing them. The father, who had been leading his son in front now goes in back so that the wild animals should bump into him first, not his son ----------------------------------------- In other words, Rashi sees Ex14-19 as providing a FURTHER DETAIL to the concept of GOD CARED FOR YOU LIKE A FATHER. God had fought for the Jews who were helpless like children. *3 Rashi does not cite Nu32-05:08 but instead explains ------------------------------------------- God wanted sinners dead lest they influence their children into rebelling against God ------------------------------------------- *4 That is: Don't learn idolatry for purposes of practicing it. But it is permissable to learn idolatry for purposes of instructing people on what not to do and on the horrors of particular idolatries.*11 *5 You can SUPPLEMENT Rashi with ADDITIONAL reasons - Rashi emphasizes that because Jacob was fleeing he had no money - I would add that perhaps Jacob was saying ----------------------------------------- Look I stole blessings from Esauv So my mother, your sister, things I should intern by you to learn how to do such things since this is the way you operate ----------------------------------------- --------------------- LONGER FOOTNOTES --------------------- *10 Rashi gives an alternate argument ----------------------------------------------------- Both the LEPOR and DEAD transmit a status of ritual impurity to a person who merely walks into the same room with them ----------------------------------------------------- However we would summarize this Rashi argument as follows --------------------------------------------------------- Both the LEPOR and DEAD are considered REPULSIVE. Hence - merely being in the same room with them confers impurity - People AVOID both the LEPOR and DEAD BODY --------------------------------------------------------- Such an approach to Rashi is deeper and more satisfying and sheds light on the analogy. *11 Rashi's literal language is --------------------------------------------------- DON'T LEARN TO DO, but you can LEARN TO TEACH --------------------------------------------------- This statement is short, punchy and to the point. Furthermore the literal text of Dt18-09a is DON'T LEARN TO DO. Thus it appears that Rashi made his inference from the EXTRA phrase TO DO (DONT LEARN TO DO vs DONT LEARN). However the approach of this list is to explain Rashi inferences in terms of broad laws such as OTHER VERSES. In this list we shy away from inferences from 'extra phrases.' Since Dt12-30 clearly prohibits LEARNING/INQUIRING FOR PURPOSES OF PRACTICE we prefer this OTHER VERSE explanation Consequently, this Rashi is one of those PEACHES that illustrate our different approach to Rashi explanations. |
*#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc., 2005, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#*#*#
VERSE: Gn37-30a
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04 | ||
SUCCINCT SUMMARY ---------------- One of Rashis 10 main methods is the explanation of meaning the same way a dictionary explains meaning. We call this the WORD MEANING method. Rashi will sometimes explain IDIOMS. An IDIOM is a collection of words, which together means something different than its component parts. Thus the IDIOM endows NEW MEANING to the collection of words. Very often the IDIOMATIC meaning is closely related to the individual words. We call this the NEW MEANING submethod of the WORD MEANING method. EXAMPLE Gn37-30a ---------------- The brothers wanted to kill Joseph because of his dreams and desire to rule. Reuven, the eldest brother stopped them: He suggested throwing him into a pit in order to secretly return him to his father. But the brothers double-crossed him and sold him. Gn37-30 states ----------------------------- Reuven returned to the pit but Joseph was not there and Reuven said I--WHERE DO I GO ----------------------------- Rashi translates the verse phrase ----------------- I---WHERE DO I GO ----------------- as an IDIOM meaning ------------- I AM HOPELESS ------------- Similarl IDIOMS exist in English. LIST854x below gives other examples of Rashis explaining IDIOMS, NEW MEANINGS. | ||
ITEM | DETAIL | |
RASHI RULE CLASS: | WORD MEANINGS | |
RASHI SUBRULE CLASS | NEW MEANINGS | |
RASHI WORKBOOK PRINCIPLE | #7 | |
SEE BELOW | LIST854x | |
List of | Biblical idioms(eg FROM DAYS DAYS=YEARLY) |
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04 | ||||
List of Biblical idioms..eg FROM DAYS DAYS=YEARLY LIST854x continues LIST854d LIST854z LIST854y | ||||
VERSE | BIBLICAL PHRASE | TRANSLATION | NOTES | |
Gn37-30a | WHERE DO I GO | I am hopeless | ||
Gn28-15b | UNTIL THAT IF.... | UNTIL COMPLETION of | *12 | |
Gn24-49a | If not I go LEFT/RIGHT | I go to NEARBY people | *11 | |
Gn27-16a | This will COVER THE EYE | Prevent EYEING you | *8 | |
Gn13-03a | went by HIS JOURNEYS | Lodged at SAME HOTELS | *7 | |
Dt33-14a | SUNNED wheat | FULLY RIPE wheat | ||
Dt33-14b | Monthly EXPELS | Monthly TURNOVER | ||
Dt33-15a | 1st of OLD MOUNTS | VINTAGE ANCIENT MOUNT | ||
Dt33-15b | ETERNAL hills | EVERgreen Hills | ||
------- | ------------------- | --------------------- | ----- | |
Dt32-20b | NO-NATION | DESPICABLE nation | ||
Dt32-21c | TURNING generation | TURN-A-COATS | ||
Dt17-09a | PRIEST-LEVITES | Priests or Levites | *6 | |
------- | ------------------- | --------------------- | ----- | |
Dt13-13b | when you hear a RUMOR | TO BE SAID over&over | *5 | |
Ex35-04a | God commandsTo TRANSMIT | TO BE SAID over | *5 | |
Nu12-13b | Prayed/Demands RESPONSE | TO BE SAID back | *5 | |
Nu27-15b | Prayed/Demands RESPONSE | TO BE SAID back | *5 | |
Ex20-01c | God said:Asked RESPONSE | Affirm will keep | *5 | |
------- | ------------------- | --------------------- | ----- | |
Dt12-28b | Do the MORAL & PROPER | Spiritual/Social good | *4 | |
Dt12-28c | Do the MORAL & PROPER | Spiritual/Social good | *4 | |
------- | ------------------- | --------------------- | ----- | |
Nu26-54a | MOUTH OF LOTTERY | Closed Jar Lottery | *3 | |
Nu21-20c | HEAD OF THE CLIFF | TOP of the CLIFF | *2 | |
Nu13-20b | DAYS OF GRAPE 1st FRUIT | GRAPE HARVEST SEASON | ||
Nu13-32a | Land EATS INHABITANTS | PLAGUE RIDDEN LAND | ||
Lv25-23b | Dont STICK THE SALE | Dont sell PERMANANTLY | No redeem | |
Lv26-17a | PLACE FACE*1 | Total attention/focus | to punish | |
Lv13-12a | HEAD to FOOT Whole bod | y | ||
Gn37-26b | COVER BLOOD | conceal MURDER | ||
|
||||
*1 Rashi, Lv26-17h points out that the phrase ------------- PLACE MY FACE ------------- means -------------- FULL ATTENTION -------------- whether - for good, to reward - for bad, to punish. *2 NOTE: The Hebrew word HEAD can mean both - BEGINNING - TOP However in this verse - the HEAD OF THE CLIFF contrasts with - the VALLEY in MOAB Hence HEAD means TOP *3 A MOUTH LOTTERY refers to a lottery where you stick your hand in and select an item WITHOUT BEING ABLE TO SEE THE ITEMS (In an open-box lottery you can see what you are picking even though you see backs of cards. In a MOUTH LOTTERY the box is covered except for a small MOUTH). The MOUTH LOTTERY is more secure and fairer. Hence the Rashi The name MOUTH LOTTERY is because the box has only a small mouth preventing you from seeing what is inside. --------------------------------------------------- MOUTH LOTTERY means that the LOTTERY speaks and says this belongs to so and so --------------------------------------------------- Of course, Rashi did not believe that LOTTERIES speak. Rather Rashi refers to the SECURITY and FAIRNESS of the lottery. In other words - MOUTH LOTTERY refers to a small MOUTH on LOTTERY box (not to a physical voice on the box) - Since the MOUTH LOTTERY is secure it is AS IF it screams and points to a correct fair choice *4 Rashi is NOT explaining the meaning of the INDIVIDUAL WORDS - GOOD - PROPER Indeed, GOOD can mean SOCIALLY GOOD also (See Gn26-29) Therefore we have interpreted this Rashi as an example of the IDIOM method. *5 These five examples show various idiomatic meanings of the INFINITIVE of the verb TO SAY: TO SAY can mean - TO SAY BACK: Request for response - TO SAY OVER: To Transmit - TO SAY OVER AND OVER: Rumor See LIST955m for a separate summary *6 Thus in Dt18-01 ------------------------------------- The PRIEST-LEVITES shall not inherit from the conquest of Israel ------------------------------------- the phrase PRIEST-LEVITES means PRIESTS OR LEVITES. Another occurrence of this phrase occurs in Dt17-18. In Dt17-09a Rashi does state ------------------------------------ The PRIESTS who are no longer Levites ------------------------------------ But I understand this to mean ------------------------------------ PRIESTS by itself means PRIESTS but not Levites while LEVITES by itself could mean LEVITES but not Priests-- PRIEST LEVITES means PRIESTS OR LEVITES*10 ------------------------------------- *7 Besides the fact that this sounds OK (WENT BY JOURNEYS= STAYED BY SAME HOTELS) the verse gives support --------------------------------------------- HE WENT BY HIS JOURNEYS...UNTIL HE RETURNED TO HIS ORIGINAL PLACE WHERE HE BUILT AN ALTAR --------------------------------------------- *8 In other words if - the King slept with Sarah and then - returned her to Abraham perhaps he "had enough of her" and just "wanted to play." But if he gives her a monetary gift then - it is recognized that a miracle happened and his return - is an apology for taking her. - Hence the money prevents people EYEING Sarah(looking at her as a 'rejected woman.' This is covered in two Rashi (Gn20-16a Gn20-16b) which are better understood as one Rashi. | ||||
|
||||
*10 Dt17-09 states --------------------------------------- [If you have a legal question then] ask the PRIEST-LEVITES, the Judges of the day --------------------------------------- The law PREFERS that the great Sanhedrin court in Jerusalem consist of PRIESTS. Levites are a second choice (and Israelite scholars are a third choice). So it appears that Rashi's comment -------------------------------------- Priests but not Levites -------------------------------------- is literal. But in Dt18-01 the prohibition of inheriting conquested Israelie land applies to EITHER Priests OR Levites. Similarly I would interprtet Dt17-09 to mean that EITHER Priests or Levites should preferably be on the Great Sanhedrin. That is the Biblical law. But Rabbinically---since Priests are more involved with the Temple there is a preference for Priests to be elected to the great court vs. Levites. This preference however is rooted in logic not in the verse. The IDIOM, PRIEST-LEVITES means PRIESTS or LEVITES as shown. *11 See LIST854c for further examples where LEFT OR RIGHT means a LITTLE bit. Rashi's actual language is --------------------------------------------------- If you dont consent to the marriage then I will either - go to the RIGHT (RASHI: The Ishmaelites) - or the LEFT (RASHI: Lot-ites) --------------------------------------------------- But in light of the examples in LIST854c this Rashi should not be taken literally! Rather Rashi should be interpreted broadly ---------------------------------------- My master prohibited marriages to Canaanites So if you dont consent to the marriage I will go to OTHER FAMILY MEMBERS OF ABRAHAM - such as ISHMAEL his son - or LOT his nephew ----------------------------------------- There is temptation to interpret -LEFT=LOT=weakness=(He committed incest with daughters) -RIGHT=STRENGTH=Ishmael However this SPECIFIC and FOCUSED interpretation of LEFT and RIGHT is unsupported by the many other examples in LIST854c below. Notice this use of LISTS. We are only justified in reading into Rashi what can be obtained from LISTS We are not justified in reading extra! Finally for those into Talmudic flavor note that - all the other verses speak about LEFT/RIGHT - Gn24-49 speaks about LEFT OR RIGHT (Hebrew Aleph-Vav) Perhaps then the ALEPH VAV gives extra emphasis But 2S02-19 shows that LEFT/RIGHT and LEFT OR RIGHT both mean the same thing---A LITTLE BIT *12 See LIST854m |
*#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc., 2005, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#*#*#
VERSE: Gn37-31b
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04 | ||
SUCCINCT SUMMARY: ----------------- One of Rashi's 10 major goals is the explanation of GRAMMAR the same way modern textbooks explain GRAMMAR. There are three major GRAMMAR submethods: (a) The goal of the ROOT submethod is to explain all conjugations and meanings of Biblical roots. Biblical roots are conjugated with letter prefixes and suffixes to indicate (i) tense (ii) person (iii) gender (iv) plurality (v) mode (vi) object (to whom the activity is done) and (vii) mood. Each of these conjugations has a specific meaning. Furthermore, these conjugations take on different forms for roots with weak letters. (b) The SENTENCE submethod deals with grammatical attributes of sentences such as (i) word arrangement (Verb Subject vs Subject Verb) (ii) sentence type (interrogative, command) (iii) compound sentences (iv) apposition and (v) paragraph / sentence development. (c) The MISCELLANEOUS grammatical methods deal with (i) agreement (in gender and plurality), (ii) the construct (iii) pronoun reference (iv) ellipsis (v) noun-verb transforms (e.g. to dust) (vi) special word usage(e.g. how to use numbers) (vii) suffix-prefixes (e.g. terminal HEY means towards). EXAMPLE Gn37-31b ---------------- The Hebrew word for - COAT is Caph(Kobutz) Tauv(Cholam) Nun(Segol) Tauv - COAT OF is Caph(SHVA) Tauv(Cholam) Nun(Segol) Tauv COAT OF is the POSSESIVE FORM; typically this form may begin with a SHVA if the word is long. As can be seen the CHIRIK changes to a SHVA In the following words the CONSTRUCT state begins with a SHVA ---------------------------------------------------------------- WORD 1st LETTER CHANGE OTHER CHANGES ------------------- ----------------- -------------------------- Resh-Kuph-Yud-Ayin (Komatz to Shva) Caph Tauv Nun Tauv (Kobutz to Shva) Mem Tauv Resh (Komatz to Shva) (komatz changes to patach) Shin Gimel Resh (Segol to Shva) (Terminal Tauv added) Shin Nun Hey (Segol to Shva) (segol changes to Patach) ---------------------------------------------------------------- LIST085a below summarizes this list of long words which change to initial SHVA in the CONSTRUCT POSSESSIVE state | ||
ITEM | DETAIL | |
RASHI RULE CLASS: | GRAMMAR | |
RASHI SUBRULE CLASS | CONSTRUCT | |
RASHI WORKBOOK PRINCIPLE | #9 | |
SEE BELOW | LIST085a | |
List of Biblical roots | whose construct starts with shva |
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04 | |||
List of Biblical roots whose construct starts with shva | |||
WORD | 1st LETTER CHANGE | OTHER CHANGES | |
Resh-Kuph-Yud-Ayin | (Komatz to Shva) | ||
Caph Tauv Nun Tauv | (Kobutz to Shva) | *1 | |
Mem Tauv Resh | (Komatz to Shva) | (komatz changes to patach) | |
Shin Gimel Resh | (Segol to Shva) | (Terminal Tauv added) | |
Shin Nun Hey | (Segol to Shva) | (segol changes to Patach) | |
|
|||
*1 Gn37-31a |
*#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc., 2005, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#*#*#
VERSE: Gn37-10a
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04 | ||
SUCCINCT SUMMARY ---------------- Rashi frequently makes powerful inferences from the ALIGNMENT, that is, the word by word comparison, of almost identical verses.The minor variations between these almost similar verses suggests nuances and differences or even meaning. We call this the Rashi rule of ALIGNMENT -When Rashi identifies two cases from the ALIGNMENT we call this the Rashi subrule of TWO CASES -When Rashi infers nuances from the variations between the almost similar verses (or verse phrases) we call this the Rashi subrule of NUANCES. -When Rashi infers MEANING from the ALIGNMENT of almost identical phrases we call this the Rashi SUBRULE of MEANING. EXAMPLE Gn37-09:10 ---------------- Note the contrast between Gn37-09 and Gn37-10 --------------------------------------------- And he dreamed yet another dream, and TOLD IT TO HIS BROTHERS and said, Behold, I have again dreamed a dream; and, behold, the sun and the moon and the eleven stars made obeisance to me. --------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- And he TOLD IT TO HIS FATHER AND TO HIS BROTHERS and his father rebuked him, and said to him, What is this dream that you have dreamed? Shall I and your mother and your brothers indeed come to bow down ourselves to you to the earth? ------------------------------------------------- As the capped words show - he told it to his brothers - he told it to his brothers and father. Hence the Rashi, based on this ALIGNMENT ------------------------------------------- He initially told it to his brothers who resented him. So he retold it to the whole family (father in presence of his brothers) ------------------------------------------- LIST309L summarizes this ALIGNMENT. | ||
ITEM | DETAIL | |
RASHI RULE CLASS: | ALIGNMENT | |
RASHI SUBRULE CLASS | NUANCES | |
RASHI WORKBOOK PRINCIPLE | #11 | |
SEE BELOW | LIST309L | |
Alignment of verses with | Joe told dream to BROTHERS vs FAMILY |
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04 | ||
Alignment of verses with Joe told dream to BROTHERS vs FAMILY | ||
VERSE | TEXT of verse with word for NAMING, CAPPED | |
Gn37-09 | He told the dream to his brothers | |
Gn37-10 | He told the dream to his father and to his brothers | |
Differs | *1 *2 *2 | |
|
||
*1 The same in both verses *2 So (Rashi) he - first told his brothers who resented him and - then told his family (Say at the dinner table) literally: both his father and brothers |
*#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc., 2005, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#*#*#
VERSE: Gn37-10b
RASHIS COVERED: Gn37-10b Gn37-10c Gn37-11a
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04 | ||
SUCCINCT SUMMARY ---------------- One of Rashis 10 main goals was the resolution of contradictions. These contradictions typically arise from two verses stating contradictory things. We call this the RASHI RULE OF CONTRADICTION. Rashi had three methods to resolve contradiction. If the CONTRADICTION could be resolved by viewing the contradictory verses as two aspects of the same item then we employ the the TWO ASPECTS method of resolution. If the CONTRADICTION could be resolved by viewing the contradictory verses as two stages of the same process then we employ the TWO STAGES submethod. Finally if the CONTRADICTION could be resolved by retranslating the verses using broader or more literal meanings then we use the BROAD-LITERAL submethod. EXAMPLE: Gn37-09:11 ------------------- Gn37-09 states that Joseph's brothers hated him because of his dreams Gn37-10 states that his father yelled at him because of his dreams Gn37-11 states that - Joseph's brothers were possessive of him - Joseph's father guarded the dream We see the CONTRADICTION. Gn37-10 states that Joseph's father YELLED at him while Gn37-11 says he GUARDED the dream. Rashi resolves this CONTRADICTION using the method of TWO ASPECTS ------------------------------------------- - PUBLICLY Joseph's father yelled at him so as not to further inflame the brother's hatred - PRIVATELY Joseph's father GUARDED the dream since he expected it to be true ------------------------------------------- LIST510a below gives other examples of CONTRADICTORY verses resolved thru TWO STAGES. | ||
ITEM | DETAIL | |
RASHI RULE CLASS: | CONTRADICTION | |
RASHI SUBRULE CLASS | 2 ASPECTS | |
RASHI WORKBOOK PRINCIPLE | #14 | |
SEE BELOW | LIST510a | |
List of verses with | Contradiction resolved by 2 cases |
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04 | |||
List of verses with Contradiction resolved by 2 cases | |||
VERSE-1 | VERSE-2 | HOW THE TWO TEXTS ARE COMBINED | |
Gn37-10 | Gn37-11 | PUBLICLY:Jacob disagreed;PRIVATELY:agreed*15 | |
Gn27-05 | Gn27-05 | Esauv went to HUNT food;if not-to buy/steal | |
Gn08-17 | Gn08-17 | LET the animals go out;if they dont EVICT them | |
Dt16-22 | Gn28-18 | 1-stone Altar:OK for Patriarchs;not for us*6 | |
Dt`6-22 | Nu13-30 | The MINORITY repor of the spies was: Land Good | |
Lv19-20 | Lv20-10 | adultery: With free person,death;with maid,no | |
Lv19-13 | Dt24-15 | day worker:Pay by morn;Night labor by sunset | |
Lv13-33 | Lv13-33 | DONT shave[near]leprosy;DO shave rest of head | |
Lv13-40 | Lv13-43 | leprosy on baldness:like SKIN,not HEAD,leprosy | |
Ex09-03 | Ex09-09 | FIELD livestock died;HOUSE livestock had boils | |
Ex09-03 | Ex09-09 | HOUSE livestock who returned outside HAILED | |
Ex09-19 | Ex14-07 | FIELD livestock died;HOUSE animals for Chariot | |
Gn36-02 | Gn36-24 | Daughter of FATHER & GRANDFATHER=illegitim | |
Gn24-08 | Gn24-08 | DONT marry CANAANITE;can marry out of family | |
Gn06-19 | Gn07-02 | Noach took:7 KOSHER animals;2 NON-KOSHER ones | |
Dt12-18 | Nu18-24 | Levites get 1st TITHE;also get GIFTS TO POOR | |
Dt12-30 | Ex22-19 | SPECIFIC idol worship OR general SACS wrong | |
Ex30-19 | Ex40-31 | Tmpl Basin for Priests;Moses was Priest once*5 | |
Ex21-03 | Ex21-04 | Master only gives a slavegirl to a married man | |
Ex12-02 | Ex12-03 | God told Moses on FIRST: Tell Jews on TENTH... | |
Ex01-16 | Ex01-12 | EGYPTIANS hated ALL JEWS;PHARAOH hated MALES*4 | |
Ex02-06 | Ex02-06 | She saw a BABY(in age);a CHILD(in demeanor)*3 | |
Gn18-06 | Gn18-06 | FINE FLOUR for food;COARSE for pot*2 | |
Dt08-02 | Lv26-06 | WHEN OBSERVANT God protects;ELSE not*1 | |
Nu21-21 | Dt02-26 | MOSES sent delegates on behalf of ISRAEL | |
Nu05-08 | Nu05-08 | Stolen goods given to PRIESTS on behalf of GOD | |
Ex20-19 | Ex19-20 | Gods voice in HEAVEN;His FIRE on EARTH | |
Ex40-35 | Ex25-22 | Moses at Entrance; Gods by Crubim | |
Ex28-37 | Ex39-30 | Priest MASK went AROUND and OVER head | |
Ex25-03 | Ex30-12 | TAXES for base;VOLUNTARY for vessels | |
Nu04-05 | Nu04-15 | PRIESTS pack; KEHATHITES carry*10 | |
|
|||
*1 See Lv26-03. Thus Lv26-03:06 explicitly states that when we observe, God will remove wild animals. Dt08-02 by contrast, explains that conquest of Israel will happen slowly FOR IF IT HAPPEEND QUICKLY WILD ANIMALS WOULD COME (because the Jews moral nature was not yet perfected and the protection of Lv26-03:06 does not yet apply) *11 *2 COARSE flour was used in cooking to wash the pot sides to clear it from rust producing agents and rotted food particles. *3 I should mention the Brilliant Malbim who points out to a repeated object denoting emphasis ----------------------------------------- She opened it and saw HIM -- a CHILD ----------------------------------------- Thus the child had a certain regality *12 *4 This distinction is explicitly mentioned in Ex01-10 Pharoh was concerned that the Jewish minority would align with an Egyptian enemy. Hence he killed the males. *13 *5 See Lv08-16:21 for Moses acting as a Priest. During this brief period Moses used the Temple Basin. *6 First we note that MONUMENTS (MCBA) were made of 1 stone. Compare the following verses - Gn31-45 Jacob took the STONE and made MONUMENT - Gn28-18 Jacob took the STONE and made Monument Next we note that God found the MONUMENT that Jacob made (and declared to be a house of God), God found this altar pleasing. ----------------------------------------------- - Gn31-13 I am the God of Beth El where you made a monument --[I am with you] Therefore leave this place ----------------------------------------------- Finally we compare the following 4 contradictory verses ------------------------------------------------ Ex20-21:22 You can make altars of EARTH, STONES Dt27-05 Make altar of stones when coming to Israel Dt16-22a Don't make MONUMENT Dt16-22b Don't make MONUMENT, hated by God Gn28-18 Jacob took the stone and made a MONUMENT ------------------------------------------------ In this discussion we treat ALTARS and MONUMENTS the same. The contradictory verses can be resolved as follows - ONE-STONE altars/monuments are - - prohibited to us and hated by God - - permitted to Patriarches and liked by God - MANY STONE altars/Monuments are permitted*14 | |||
|
|||
*10 Rashis point is strengthened by the abrupt change of subject ----------------------------------------------- Nu04-04 This is the job of the KEHATHITES Nu04-05 The PRIESTS come and cover the articles ... Nu04-15 ..and AFTERWARDS the KEHATHITES come ----------------------------------------------- If one just reads Nu04-04 and Nu04-05 by themselves it appears as if the PRIESTS mentioned in Nu04-05 refer back to the KEHATHITES mentioned in Nu04-04 *11 Interesting Rashi cites a verse in Job rather than the explicit Lv26-03:06. Rashi also does not explicitly mention that he is using the rule of resolving 2 contradictory cases. But that IS what Rashi does. It seems rather straightforward to introduce Lv26-03:06. Rashi probably expected the reader to know this verse since it comes in the great REBUKE---Rashi complements this verses with complementary verses in Job *12 Rashis actual language is that ------------------------------------ She saw Gods presence with him ------------------------------------ I have tempered this a bit as follows --------------------------- She saw the childs regality --------------------------- I think Rashis point is to explain why she risked her life to save a Jewish child This child was different--he had a certain regality...why not raise him as an Egyptian He would fit in well with the Royal house *13 Rashi actually says ------------------------------------------ Pharohs astrologers said that the Jews have just had a male savior born. Pharoh therefore decreed the death of the male Jews ------------------------------------------ However the REAL driving force of Rashi is the contradictory verses and the resolution from an explicit verse. Rashi avails himself of OTHER VERSES which show that Pharoh always consulted with his astrologers (eg Ex08-12:15). Thus Rashi is simply dressing up the contradiction. The real point of Rashi is the contradiction and the distinction between the people(hated all) and the King. (concerned about security) *14 Rashi does not give a reason why 1-stone altars are prohibited but many-stone are ok. I would suggest that 1-stone altars are so to speak BLEMISHED altars-altars made on the rush. Throughout the offering literature blemished items are considered poor taste. The patriarchs however were busy converting people frequently. Hence,they made altars on the go (one stone altars) and this was liked by God. *15 PUBLICLY: He disagreed so as not to further inflame the brothers who hated Joseph PRIVATELY: He agreed because he believed in the dream |
#*#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc., 2002, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#*#*#
VERSE: Gn37-01a
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04 | ||
SUCCINCT SUMMARY ---------------- Rashi will frequentlly make a comment by making broad database inquiries. A database inquiry is simply a question addressed to a large databank---typically a large collection of verses. Thus DATABASE methods typically span many diverse verses. Gn37-01a ----------- In todays query we ask ------------------------------------ When one person excels in a group how does the Bible record the history of group/person ------------------------------------ The answer we find is that ------------------------------------ - The Bible AT LEAST MENTIONS everyone in the group--typically for a verse or 2 - The Bible devotes ALOT OF TEXT to the person who excels ------------------------------------ Rashi brings the following examples ----------------------------------- Example 1 --------- Gn05, Gn06 record the 10 generations from Adam to Noach. Each generation has 3 verses. But the story of Noach has many verses Example 2 --------- Gn11, Gn12 record the 10 generations from Noach to Abraham. These generations typically have 3 verses each. But the story of Abraham has many verses. Example 3 --------- Gn36, Gn37 record the genealogies and history of Esauv and Jacob. The genealogies and history of Esauv are terse; whole stories are often only hinted at in a few verses; while the genealogies and stories of Jacob are dealt with in many verses. The above examples were brought by Rashi. To these examples I supplement further examples. Example 4 --------- Nu07 and Nu08 describe the gifts at the consecration of the Wilderness Temple. The gifts of each of the tribes occupies 6 verses. The contribution of Aaron occupies a whole chapter. Example 5 --------- 1C01 thru 1C12 deal quickly with all of human history to King David's time. By contrast 1C13 thru 1C17 are slow paced, describing the beginning of the centralization of temple worship under King David's reign. LIST606k below summarizes this database query. | ||
ITEM | DETAIL | |
RASHI RULE CLASS: | DATABASES | |
RASHI SUBRULE CLASS | PATTERNS | |
RASHI WORKBOOK PRINCIPLE | #27 | |
SEE BELOW | LIST606k | |
List of | Stories with 1 person excelling per grp |
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04 | ||||
List of Stories with 1 person excelling per grp | ||||
EXAMPLE # | BIBLICAL TEXTS | PERSON EXCELLING | GROUP *1 | |
1 | Gn05 Gn06 | Noach | Adam-Noach | |
2 | Gn11 Gn12 | Abraham | Noach-Abraham | |
3 | Gn36 Gn37 | Jacob | Jacob, Esauv | |
4 | Nu07 Nu08 | Aaron-Priest | All tribes | |
5 | 1C01 1C17*2 | David*2 | Human History | |
|
||||
*1 In each of the records in this table - an entire group is reviewed in the Bible - only a small amount of text is devoted to each member (token mentioning) - much space is allocated to the person who excelled. *2 - 1C01 thru 1C12 describe human history until David - 1C13 thru 1C17 describe David's reign and the beginning of the centralization of the Temple |
*#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc., 2005, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#*#*#
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04 | |||
Lighting summary of Rashis with emphasis on Rashi rules*10 | |||
# | LIST | BRIEF SUMMARY OF RASHI EMPHASIZING USE OF RASHI RULES | |
1 | 210x | Gn38-08a,YABAM,illuminated by Dt25-05:06,PERPETUATE FAMILY | |
7 | 854x | WHERE CAN I GO is an IDIOM meaning HELPLESSNESS | |
9 | 085a | 1st letter of Long Hebrew words in construct/possessive is SHVA | |
11 | 309L | 1st dream told to BROTHER---2nd dream to BROTHER/FATHER=FAMILY | |
14 | 510a | Jacob YELLED publicly at Joe vs GUARDED Privately-believed dream | |
27 | 606k | Biblical style:Focus on Excellent person;terse on rest | |
|
|||
| |||
|
|||
*10 The explanation of the list should be clear - The first column gives the NUMBER of the RASHI RULE used All Rashi rules may be found with examples at http://wwww.Rashiyomi.com/workbook.htm - The second column gives the LIST ID (eg LIST210z) which contains many examples of a particular Rashi technique and includes the example presented in the third column - The third column gives a lightning summary of the Rashi with particular emphasis on the Rashi rule used. All lists may be found at http://www.Rashiyomi.com/lists.htm |
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-04 | |||
| |||
VERSE | RULE | BRIEF DESCRIPTION | |
======== | =============== | ===================================== | |
Gn38-08a | OTHER VERSES | YABAM means PERPETUATE family name | |
Gn37-30a | NEW MEANINGS | WHERE CAN I GO means I AM HELPLESS | |
Gn37-31b | GRAMMARr | CONSTRUCT changes 1st letter to SHVA | |
Gn37-10a | ALIGNMENT | Told BROTHERS vs BROTHERS & FATHER | |
Gn37-10b | CONTRADICTION | Jacob YELLED publicly;WATCHED private | |
Gn37-10c | CONTRADICTION | Jacob YELLED publicly;WATCHED private | |
Gn37-11a | CONTRADICTION | Jacob YELLED publicly;WATCHED private | |
Gn37-01a | DATABASE | Bible style:Focus on Here;terse other | |
--------- | ---------------- | ----------------------------------- |
*#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc., 2005, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#*#*#