Rabbi Ishmael-5 Methods:#13 of 14
 ###########################################################
 #      10 YEAR Ayelet DAILY-RASHI-YOMI CYCLE              #
 #            Mar 15-Apr 30, 2000                          #
 #         Rashis 1-14  Of 7800 (0.2%)                     #
 #                                                         #
 #      Reprinted with permission from Rashi-is-Simple,    #
 #             (c) 1999-Present, Dr. Hendel                #
 #             http://www.shamash.org/rashi                #
 #                                                         #
 #Permission to reprint with this header but not for profit#
 #                                                         #
 #      WARNING: READ with COURIER 10 (Fixed width) FONTS  #
 ###########################################################
This series is devoted to the 2 dozen Rashis that deal
with the Rabbi Ishmael rule of
        >two complementary verses




It turns out there are 5 ways that Rabbi Ishmael deals with
        >two complementary verses



In part 1 we showed the method of
        >2 verses = 2 ASPECTS of the same entity
Thus
        >ISRAEL sent a delegation to Edom
        >MOSES sent a delegation to Edom
perceive
        >MOSES as the representative of Israel




A reader completing the reading of this dozen-example-module
will have minimum proficiency in appreciating how this rule
of Rabbi Ishmael works (If this module works out we will
try and develop modules for the other 12 principles).




This material is printed with permission of the author,myself
Those who wish to see complete details may visit the Rashi
Website at
        >http://www.shamash.org/rashi/
You may browse, subscribe, or ask questions there.

In the previous few issues we have explored
several ways of dealing with
        >two complementary verses which seem to say
        >different things.
We have enumerated 5 methods In this issue we summarize
these five methods. In the next issue we compactly present
the dozen or so examples we have used

        ===================================
                FOR HOMEWORK

         The ambitious reader can try and
         create this summary list of the

                >dozen examples
                >the five methods

         The answer will be presented
         tomorrow
         ====================================



#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*# (C) Dr Hendel, 2000 *#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*
UNIT 13:
========
Summary of the Five methods by which Rabbi Ishmael deals
with two contradictory verses.


METHOD 1
--------
The two verses indicate
        >two aspects of the same thing
Thus one verse says that
        >ISRAEL sent a delegation to Edom
while an alternative verse says that
        >MOSES sent a delegation to Edom.
Clearly there is no contradiction. For MOSES is the elected
representative of ISRAEL.




METHOD 2
--------
The two verses indicate
        >TWO stages of the same process
Thus two verses describe the Levite relationship with the Temple as
        >EDUCATION begins at age 25
        >SERVICE begins at age 30




METHOD 3
---------
The two verses serve to
        >proscribe a BROAD or a LENIENT interpretation
For example since one verse says that
        >slaves go free in the 50th Jubilee year
it follows that another verse which says that
        >slaves work FOREVER
requires our giving the restrictive translation
        >FOREVER = A LONG TIME (50 years)
        >ADULT as YOUNG ADULT (vs OLD ADULT but not ELDERLY)



METHOD 4
--------
Two verses may indicate
        >TWO NAMES for the same concept
For example a BIRTHSTOOL can be called
        >THE ROCKS (Because birth stools were MADE of rocks)
or
        >THE BREAKTHRU (Because the baby BREAKS THRU on it)
In other words the name can be by FUNCTION, FORM or SUBSTANCE.




METHOD 5
--------
Two verses may indicate the
      >MODALITY (Required, Permissable, Forbidden) of a commandment
For example The two verses v5-15-9 and v5-24-15 speak about the
prohibition of witholding loans or wages. The two verses warn
against hurting the person
        >lest he DOES CALL to God (5-15-9)
        >so that he DOES NOT CALL to God(5-24-15)
From these verses we learn
        >MODALITY
That is we learn that the opressed person has
        >the RIGHT to pray against the opressor(he MAY pray)
        >but is not OBLIGATED to so pray (not, he MUST pray)

#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*# (C) Dr Hendel, 2000 *#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*