The 10 RashiYomi Rules
Their presence in Rashis on Parshat BeHaR-BeChuKoThai
Vol 6 #7
- Adapted from Rashi-is-Simple
Visit the RashiYomi website: http://www.Rashiyomi.com/
(c) RashiYomi Incorporated, Dr. Hendel, President, May - 10, - 2007


The goal of this Weekly Rashi Digest is to use the weekly Torah portion to expose students at all levels to the ten major methods of commentary used by Rashi. It is hoped that continual weekly exposure to these ten major methods will enable students of all levels to acquire a familiarity and facility with the major exegetical methods.

    1. RASHI METHOD: REFERENCES
    BRIEF EXPLANATION: Commentary on a verse is provided thru a cross-reference to another verse. The cross references can either provide
    • (1a) further details,
    • (1b) confirm citations, or
    • (1c) clarify word meaning.
    This examples applies to Rashis Lv25-08a
    URL Reference: (c) http://www.Rashiyomi.com/lv25-08a.htm
    Brief Summary: The SABBATH YEAR(Lv25-08) refers to the LAND SABBATICALS(Lv25-02:03)

Verses Lv23-08 discussing the Jubillee year states And you shall count seven sabbath years to you, seven times seven years; and the space of the seven sabbaths of years shall be to you forty and nine years. Rashi explains the underlined phrase sabbath years by citing a nearby reference Lv25-02:04 which describes the land sabbatical: Speak to the people of Israel, and say to them, When you come into the land which I give you, then shall the land keep a sabbath to the Lord. Six years you shall sow your field, and six years you shall prune your vineyard, and gather in its fruit; But in the seventh year shall be a sabbath of rest to the land, a sabbath for the Lord; you shall not sow your field, nor prune your vineyard. Hence the Rashi comment: The sabbath year refers to the earlier mentioned land sabbatical during which no agriculture is done.

    2. RASHI METHOD: WORD MEANING
    BRIEF EXPLANATION: The meaning of words can be explained either by
    • (2a) translating an idiom, a group of words whose collective meaning transcends the meaning of its individual component words,
    • (2b) explaining the nuances and commonality of synonyms-homographs,
    • (2c) describing the usages of connective words like also,because,if-then, when,
    • (2d) indicating how grammatical conjugation can change word meaning
    • (2e) changing word meaning using the figures of speech common to all languages such as irony and oxymorons.
    This examples applies to Rashis Lv25-04b
    URL Reference: (c) http://www.Rashiyomi.com/lv25-08a.htm
    Brief Summary: TO VINE means to REMOVE / PRUNE vines; TO DUST means to REMOVE dust.

    Today we explore how conjugations can transform the word meanings of common nouns into verbs. This happens in three ways:
    • The verb can indicate the production / creation of the noun
    • The verb can indicate the removal of the noun
    • The verb can indicate the typical activity done with the noun.
    The following examples illustrate the above 3 paradigms:
    • to vine, means to remove / prune vines [Rashi: Lv25-04b];
    • to dust, means to remove dust;
    • -------------------------------------------------
    • to flower, means to produce new flowers;
    • -------------------------------------------------
    • to hammer, refers to the typical activity done with a hammer;
    • to insectify, swarming and producing many children [Rashi: Ex01-07a]
    • to fish-ify, producing a school of many children. [Rashi: Gn48-16c]

    3. RASHI METHOD: GRAMMAR
    BRIEF EXPLANATION: Rashi explains verses using grammar principles, that is, rules which relate reproducable word form to word meaning. Grammatical rules neatly fall into 3 categories
    • (a) the rules governing conjugation of individual words,Biblical roots,
    • (b) the rules governing collections of words,clauses, sentences
    • (c) miscellaneous grammatical, or form-meaning, rules.
    This examples applies to Rashis Lv26-08a
    URL Reference: (c) http://www.Rashiyomi.com/lv26-08a.htm
    Brief Summary: FROM WITHIN YOU (i.e. Jewish anti-semites) your enemies will reign

Many students of Rashi are aware of Rashis based on grammatical peculiarities or excessive words. However Rashi can also be based on a non-standard word order. A non-standard word order generally indicates unspecified emphasis. The examples below illustrate this principle.

    Before proceeding we point out the difficulty in mirroring these Rashis in the translations. Some terminology will help clarify this difficulty. Most languages have a characteristic word order.
    • For example the characteristic word order in English is Subject-Verb-Object, for example, your enemies will reign over you. Here enemies is the subject, reign is the verb, and you is the object. Hence, this sentence has the typical subject-verb-object order. Linguists, for short, call this sequence S-V-O, using the first letters of Subject-Verb-Object.
    • However the characteristic word order in Hebrew is V-S-O; that is the verb comes first, followed by the subject, followed by the object.
    It is therefore hard to capture order, or deviance from order, in an English translation! Instead we shall adopt the following translation rule: We shall translate a standard word order in Hebrew into a standard word order in English. We shall similarly translate a non-standard word order in Hebrew into a non-standard word order in English. However we shall not otherwise attempt to translate word-order literally.

With this in mind let us analyze Lv16-17j which states On you, your enemies will reign. The standard-word order would require Your enemies will regin on you, since the phrase on you is the direct object of the sentence. The non-standard word order, On you, your enemies will reign, indicates an unspecified emphasis in the phrase on you. Hence the Rashi comment: Your enemies will not only reign over you but your enemies are on you, they will come from you; you will be the victim of your own Jewish anti-semitism. Here, Rashi is not just making a pun; rather Rashi is focusing on the non-standard word-order.

Advanced Rashi: We will further use the word order method in rule #7, Formatting below. The word order rule is overlooked by many students of Rashi. Its use greatly simplifies certain Rashis.

    4. RASHI METHOD: ALIGNMENT
    BRIEF EXPLANATION: Aligning two almost identically worded verselets can suggest
    • (4a) 2 cases of the same incident or law
    • (4b) emphasis on the nuances of a case
    • (4c) use of broad vs literal usage of words
    This examples applies to Rashis Lv25-43a Lv25-53a
    URL Reference: (c) http://www.Rashiyomi.com/lv25-53a.htm
    Brief Summary: Don't abuse slaves (jewish owner) vs Don't abuse slaves OPENLY (non-jewish owners)

    The two Biblical verses below discuss the prohibition of abusing slaves. One verse applies to slaves of Jewish owners while the other verse applies to slaves of non-Jewish owners. Note the aligned difference between the two verses:
  • Slaves (Jewish owners) - Lv25-43a, states do not work him abusively;
  • Slaves (non-Jewish owners) - Lv21-53a ... do not work him abusively openly.

    Notice the extra underlined word - openly - exposed by the alignment. Hence the Rashi comment:
  • Non-Jewish Owners:
    • You are only prohibited from letting a non-Jewish owner openly create an abusive work environment for his Jewish slave.
    • If you however hear about it, but do not see it openly, then you are not obligated to enter the non-Jew's home.
  • Jewish Owners:
    • You are prohibited from letting a Jewish owner openly create an abusive work environment for his slaves.
    • You are also obligated, if you hear of indoor abusive work practices, to enter the premises and stop the abusive practices.

    5. RASHI METHOD: CONTRADICTION
    BRIEF EXPLANATION:Rashi resolves contradictory verses using 3 methods.
    • (5a) Resolution using two aspects of the same event
    • (5b) Resolution using two stages of the same process
    • (5c) Resolution using broad-literal interpretation.
    This example applies to Rashis Lv25-21a Lv25-22a
    URL Reference: (c) http://www.Rashiyomi.com/lv25-21a.htm
    Brief Summary: Seed from 6th year is used at the a) end of 6th b) all of 7th c) beginning of 8th.

    Note the contradiction in the following two sets of verses, discussing the requirement to allow the land to lie follow every 7th year (the so-called land sabbatical). Verse Lv25-20:23 states:
  • And if you shall say, What shall we eat the seventh year? behold, we shall not sow, nor gather in our produce;
  • Then I will command my blessing upon you in the sixth year, and it shall bring forth fruit for three years. And you shall sow the eighth year, and eat still of old fruit until the ninth year; until its fruits come in you shall eat of the old store.

We see the contradiction, indicated by the underlined phrases. Which is it? Are we prohibited from agriculture only in the 7th year? Or, are we also prohibited in the 6th and 8th year? If we are not prohibited in the 6th and 8th year why do we need a Biblical promise that the blessings of the sixth year will carry forward for three years.

    It is not hard to resolve this contradiction. Rashi resolves it using some simple operational details:
  • In each year we sow and harvest for that year and also the beginning of the next year. Hence, in the 6th year we sow and harvest (as usual) for that year.
  • However the harvest from the sixth year, which should typically feed us for that sixth year, will also feed us for the totality of the 7th year when we can't perform agriculture.
  • But then when the 8th year begins we still don't have any harvest. Rather we have to sow in the 8th year and we do not reap the harvest of the 8th year till after the summer. But after the summer is the Jewish New Year and the ninth year begins. Hence the harvest of the 6th year is needed while harvesting the agriculture of the 8th year which gets completed at the beginning of the 9th year.

Advanced Rashi: We have employed the contradiction method to explain the above verses. Further clarification may be obtained from the non-verse-diagram method. The following time diagram clarifies the above Rashi. Very often the use of two Rashi methods adds clarity. Please feel free to read rule #9, Spreadsheets-Diagrams now.

    6. RASHI METHOD: STYLE
    Rashi examines how rules of style influences inferences between general and detail statements in paragraphs.
    • Example: Every solo example stated by the Bible must be broadly generalized;
    • Theme-Detail: A general principle followed by an example is interpreted restrictively---the general theme statement only applies in the case of the example;
    • Theme-Detail-Theme: A Theme-Detail-Theme unit is interpreted as a paragraph. Consequently the details of the paragraph are generalized so that they are seen as illustrative of the theme.
    This examples applies to Rashis Lv25-08a Lv25-08b
    URL Reference: (c) http://www.Rashiyomi.com/lv28-08a.htm
    Brief Summary: Jubilee = 1 year after 7 Land-Sabbaticals each with 6 preceding agriculture years

In my article Biblical Formatting I have indicated that the Biblical Author will use a theme-detail-theme style to indicate a paragraph the same way a modern author will use indentation and a line of white space to indicate a paragraph. The fact that several sentences form one paragraph generally indicates exegesis: The diverse sentences are perceived as indicating one central theme; they are not interpreted exclusively.

    With this in mind let us review verses Lv21-18:21 which is written in a theme-detail-theme style as shown below. The verse-paragraph discusses the obligation to declare a Jubilee year every 50 th year in order to free all slaves and in order to let land revert to their current owner.
    • General: And you shall count seven sabbath-years,
    • Detail: seven times seven years;
    • General: the seven sabbath-years shall be forty nine years.
    ... And you shall hallow the fiftieth year, and proclaim liberty throughout all the land to all the inhabitants of it; it shall be a jubilee to you; and you shall return every man to his possession, and you shall return every man to his family.

    We can already see, in the verses above, all the terms defining the number of years prior to Jubilee:
    • 7 Sabbatical-years
    • 7 times 7 years
    • 49 years
    Hence the deceptively simple Rashi comment: The Jubilee always occurs every 50 years.

    Advanced Rashi:To fully appreciate how the General-Detail-General method affects Rashi we interpret the verses both with and without the General-Detail-General method:
    • If the verses did not use the General-Detail-General method and simply said Count 7 sabbaticals and then have a Jubilee I would interpret the verse literally: You must observe 7 sabbaticals in order to have a Jubilee. If you sinned and didn't observe the 7 Sabbaticals you can't have a Jubilee. This makes sense: If people did not forgive the monetary debts forgiven every 7th year then society would not be economically and psychologically ready for freeing personal (slavery) and land debts.
    • By using the general-detail-general style the law is interpreted broadly: Yes in a typical century you will observe 7 sabbaticals and then have a Jubilee but even if you didn't observe the 7 sabbaticals you still must have the Jubilee in the 50th year.
    This - the difference between a literal and broad interpretation - is the essence of using the theme-detail-theme paragraph method.

    7. RASHI METHOD: FORMATTING
    BRIEF EXPLANATION:Inferences from Biblical formatting:
    • Use of repetition to indicate formatting effects: bold,italics,...;
    • use of repeated keywords to indicate a bullet effect;
    • rules governing use and interpretation of climactic sequence;
    • rules governing paragraph development and discourse
    This example applies to Rashis Lv21-05c
    URL Reference: (c) http://www.Rashiyomi.com/lv21-05a.htm

    Brief Summary: a) no learning b) no performance c-d) despise religious / civil law e) no community involvement f) Apostasy.

We have explained in our article Biblical Formatting located on the world wide web at http://www.Rashiyomi.com/biblicalformatting.pdf, that the Biblical Author indicates bold, italics, underline by using repetition. In other words if a modern author wanted to emphasize a word they would either underline, bold or italicize it. However when the Biblical author wishes to emphasize a word He repeats it. The effect - whether thru repetition or using underline - is the same. It is only the means of conveying this emphasis that is different.

With this in mind let us read verse Lv25-14:15, which discusses apostasy. The discussion develops in three pairs of bulleted texts. The bullets are indicated by the underlined repeating keywords. With each verselet we present the Rashi comment. After the citation we explain how the bullet rule gives rise to the comments, not language and grammar. Many serious students of Rashi have errored by misunderstanding Rashi as emanating only from language and Grammar.

    The six verselets describing apostasy are:
    • But if you do not listen to me [Don't study], and
    • do not do [Don't perform] all these commandments;
    • And if my statutes [religious laws] are despised
    • and if my civil cases[interpersonal civil laws] are loathed by your soul
    • until you don't do any of my commandments [Don't contribute to help others perform and actively interfer with others performing],
    • until you break my covenant;[Apostasy]

We now explain what Rashi did, and did not, do. In the first set of bullets Rashi interprets the Biblical word pair, listen-do as referring to learning-perform. Rashi did not do this because of requirements of language. Indeed, listen can equally mean study or performance. Similarly do can easily mean study-performance together. Rather because the repeating underlined keyword do not create a bullet atmosphere, therefore, Rashi was justified in reading into the listen-do sequence the interpretation of learning-perform.

In the second set of bullets we use the grammar-word-order rule which we reviewed in rule #3 above. Hebrew is a verb-object language. A reversal of this order (e.g. civil laws despised vs. despise my civil laws) indicates unpsecified emphasis. When we couple this emphasis with the repeating underlined keyword, if, we see that Rashi choses to emphasize the specific nuances of statute and civil law, which very roughly refer to religious vs. civil law. Again it was not the word meaning which drove Rashi to this. Indeed, in many verses, the word statute by itself can refer to all laws just as the word civil law by itself can refer to all Jewish laws.

Because of the third set of bullets, indicated by the underlined keyword, until, Rashi contrasts commandments vs. treaty, as differentiating non-performance vs. apostasy / denial. Rashi sees further nuances in the repeating keyword, until. Rashi interprets this to mean a general development over time of non-performance and treaty violation. Hence, this is interpreted broadly to refer to being annoyed by community performance of commandments and outright denial of God.

    Sermonic Points: One does not just get up and suddenly deny God. Apostasy takes place as a gradual process. The above 6 verselets present a 6-stage process as follows:
  1. One stops learning every day
  2. One forgets and doesn't perform every law
  3. In one's dinner conversations with one's friends, the trans-rational laws are attacked as meaningless
  4. One doesn't bother to understand Jewish civil law; one attacks the rational laws.
  5. When the above 4 happen over a period of time the hatred of the law turns outward to other people - commandments should not be performed because they are rediculous.
  6. Finally, after having been cut off from learning, performance, appreciation and community, apostasy naturally evolves (With nothing to stop it).

    8. RASHI METHOD: DATABASES
    BRIEF EXPLANATION:Rashi makes inferences from Database queries. The precise definition of database query has been identified in modern times with the 8 operations of Sequential Query Language (SQL).

    This example applies to Rashis Lv25-35a
    URL Reference: (c) http://www.Rashiyomi.com/nu07-14b.htm
    Brief Summary: OPEN = money; LADEN = food, clothing; GIVE = loan; STRENGTHEN = business association.

Today we ask the database query: What words or phrases are used to indicate charity requirements in Hebrew. The database query uncovers the results given in the list below. Given the spectrum of words for charity, Rashi suggests nuances peculiar to each word.

Word for charity Verse Text Of Verse Connotations of word
Open your hand Dt15-08 But you shall open your hand wide to him, Monetary charity
laden Dt15-08 you should laden him with items sufficient for his needs ... Non-monetary charity: food, clothing etc.
Give Dt15-09:10 Beware that there be not a thought in your wicked heart, saying, The seventh year, the year of release from loans, is near; and your eye be evil against your poor brother, and you give him nothing; and he cry to the Lord against you, and it be sin to you. You should give him, and your heart shall not be grieved when you give to him; because for this thing the Lord your God shall bless you in all your works, and in all that you put your hand to. Loan
Strengthen Lv25-35 And if your brother has become poor, and his means fail with you; then you shall strengthen him; though he may be a stranger, or a sojourner; that he may live with you. Business association

Sermonic points: Although the above Rashis appears to be a simple exercise they mirror profound halachik requirements. The various terms used, each with its own connotation, - money, food, loans, business association - forms the basis for the Rambam's famous ladder of charitable activities. Thus creating a business association with a poor person is superior to loaning or giving him money since the business association enables self-sufficiency. Traditionally, we think of the Rambam's ladder as deriving from Talmudic sources. But it has its roots in Biblical sources.

    9. RASHI METHOD: SPREADSHEETS
    BRIEF EXPLANATION: The common denominator of the 3 submethods of the Spreadsheet method is that inferences are made from non textual material. The 3 submethods are as follows:
    • Spreadsheet: Rashi makes inferences of a numerical nature that can be summarized in a traditional spreadsheet
    • Geometric: Rashi clarifies a Biblical text using descriptions of geometric diagrams
    • Fill-ins: Rashi supplies either real-world background material or indicates real-world inferences from a verse. The emphasis here is on the real-world, non-textual nature of the material.
    This example applies to Rashis Lv25-21a Lv25-22a
    URL Reference: (c) http://www.Rashiyomi.com/lv25-21a.htm
    Brief Summary: Seed from 6th year is used at the a) end of 6th b) all of 7th c) beginning of 8th.

We have already, rule #5, contradiction presented the diagram approach to the Rashis on verses Lv25-20:23 which state And if you shall say, What shall we eat the seventh year? behold, we shall not sow, nor gather in our produce; Then I will command my blessing upon you in the sixth year, and it shall bring forth fruit for three years. And you shall sow the eighth year, and eat still of old fruit until the ninth year; until its fruits come in you shall eat of the old store.