The 10 RashiYomi Rules
Their presence in Rashis on Parshat BO
Volume 12, Number 4
Rashi is Simple - Volume 35 Number 4

Used in the weekly Rashi-is-Simple and the Daily Rashi.
Visit the RashiYomi website: http://www.Rashiyomi.com/
(c) RashiYomi Incorporated, Dr. Hendel, President,
Jan 29nd, 2009

The goal of this Weekly Rashi Digest is to use the weekly Torah portion to expose students at all levels to the ten major methods of commentary used by Rashi. It is hoped that continual weekly exposure to these ten major methods will enable students of all levels to acquire a familiarity and facility with the major exegetical methods.

    1. RASHI METHOD: REFERENCES
    BRIEF EXPLANATION: Commentary on a verse is provided thru a cross-reference to another verse. The cross references can either provide
    • (1a) further details,
    • (1b) confirm citations, or
    • (1c) clarify word meaning.
    This examples applies to Rashis Ex12-42c
    URL Reference: (c) http://www.Rashiyomi.com/w35n4.htm
    Brief Summary: This night (Passover) is the WATCHED NIGHT for all generations. God always protects Jews on Exodii.

Verse Ex12-42c discussing the exodus of the Jews from Egypt states It is a night of watchfulness to the Lord for bringing them out of the land of Egypt. This is a night of watching kept to the Lord by all the people of Israel throughout their generations. Rashi notes that the underlined words, night of watchfulness....throughout their generations references verses Ex12-23 discussing God's smiting the Egyptian first born but sparing the Jewish first born. Hence the Rashi comment Just as God watched the Jews when they left Egypt - the Egyptians were being smitten but the Jews were left alone - so too for all generations. Whenever the Jews exodus a tyrannical country God will simultaneously protect them while hurting their enemies.

Text of Target Verse Ex12-42c Text of Reference Verse Ex12-23
It is a night of watchfulness to the Lord for bringing them out of the land of Egypt. This is a night of watching kept to the Lord by all the people of Israel throughout their generations. For the Lord will pass through to strike the Egyptians; and when he sees the blood upon the lintel, and on the two side posts, the Lord will pass over the door, and will not let the destroyer come into your houses to strike you
Rashi comments: Just as God watched the Jews when they left Egypt - the Egyptians were being smitten but the Jews were left alone - so too for all generations. Whenever the Jews exodus a tyrannical country God will simultaneously protect them while hurting their enemies

Advanced Rashi: Rashi literally says It is watched from damaging spiritual forces as it says in Ex12-23 ....he will not let the destroyer come to Jewish houses. There are a variety of ways to interpret this: a) It could refer to a special quality of Nissan 14th; b) it could refer to the absence of demonic spiritual agents on this night. I would suggest a different approach and focus on Rashi's citation ....and I God will not allow the destroyer to come to Jewish houses... Thus I think it best to interpret the verses naturally: ....This night of Passover is watched [by the Jews! as a holiday so that] For all generations, whenever God takes the Jews out of danger there will be simultaneous destruction of enemies but protection of Jews. In other words I interpret the verse as indicating that the Passover exodus is archetypical - God protects us even while destroying our enemies. This is an important point - for we Jews would obviously be very vulnerable when leaving if God is bringing a plague. The non Jews might retaliate. Therefore we are promised that God's attack on our enemies will be coupled with our own protection and salvation.

      2. RASHI METHOD: WORD MEANING
      BRIEF EXPLANATION: The meaning of words can be explained either by
      • (2a) translating an idiom, a group of words whose collective meaning transcends the meaning of its individual component words,
      • (2b) explaining the nuances and commonality of synonyms-homographs,
      • (2c) describing the usages of connective words like also,because,if-then, when,
      • (2d) indicating how grammatical conjugation can change word meaning
      • (2e) changing word meaning using the figures of speech common to all languages such as irony and oxymorons.
      This examples applies to Rashis Ex12-11b
      URL Reference: (c) http://www.Rashiyomi.com/w35n4.htm
      Brief Summary: The Biblical root Cheth-Pay-Zayin means IMPETUOUS It can refer to a hasty action or a rattled emotional state.

When Rashi uses the synonym method he does not explain the meaning of a word but rather the distinction between two similar words both of whose meanings we already know.

    The following Hebrew words all refer to fear
  • Cheth-Pay-Zayin, ChiPaZon impetuous;
  • Pay-Cheth-Daleth, Pachad, fear
  • Yud-Resh-Eye, Yirah, revere
  • Beth-Hey-Lamed, Behalah, rattled.

    In our article Peshat and Derash: A New Intuitive and Logical Approach, which can be found on the world-wide-web at http://www.Rashiyomi.com/rashi.pdf we have advocated punchy translations of Biblical verses as a means of presenting Rashi comments. The following translation of verse
  • Ex12-11b embeds the Rashi translation Cheth-Pay-Zayin means impetuousness And thus shall you eat it; with your loins girded, your shoes on your feet, and your staff in your hand; and you shall eat it impetuously it is the Lord?s Passover.
  • 2S04-04 embeds the Rashi translation Cheth-Pay-Zayin means impetuousness And Jonathan, Saul?s son, had a son who was lame of his feet. He was five years old when the news came of Saul and Jonathan from Jezreel, and his nurse took him up, and fled; and it came to pass, as she impetuously fled, that he fell, and became lame. And his name was Mephibosheth.

Advanced Rashi: The Hebrew Cheth-Pay-Zayin is frequently translated as hastily. The last example shows that impetuousness is a more precise translation than hastily. The point of the verse is not say that she was running, but rather that she was impetuous - doing things without thinking them through - and that is why she dropped the child. For this reason Cheth-Pay-Zayin can also mean frightened and rattled, that is, being in a state of impetuousness (Dt20-03.).

      3. RASHI METHOD: GRAMMAR
      BRIEF EXPLANATION: Rashi explains verses using grammar principles, that is, rules which relate reproducable word form to word meaning. Grammatical rules neatly fall into 3 categories
      • (a) the rules governing conjugation of individual words,Biblical roots,
      • (b) the rules governing collections of words,clauses, sentences
      • (c) miscellaneous grammatical, or form-meaning, rules.
      This examples applies to Rashis Ex12-16b
      URL Reference: (c) http://www.Rashiyomi.com/w35n4.htm
      Brief Summary: No work SHALL BE DONE during Passover. RASHI: (Note the passive tense: Even work done by others is prohibited)

Most people are aware that Hebrew verbs come from three-letter roots. Each root is conjugated in the 8 dimensions of person, gender,plurality, tense, activity, modality, direct-object, and prepositional connective. For example the root Shin Mem Resh means to watch. The conjugations Shin-Mem-Resh-Tauv-Yud and Nun-Shin-Mem-Resh-Nun-Vav mean I watched and we were watched respectively.

The rules for Hebrew grammar are carefully described in many modern books and are well known. Rashi will sometimes comment when a verse is using a rare conjugation of an odd grammatical form.

When presenting grammatical Rashis my favorite reference is the appendix in volume 5 of the Ibn Shoshan dictionary. This very short appendix lists most conjugations.

Verse Ex12-16b discussing the prohibition of doing work on the Passover states And in the first day there shall be a holy convocation, and in the seventh day there shall be a holy convocation to you; no kind of work shall be done in them, save that which every man must eat, only that may be done by you. Rashi translates the Biblical word Yay-a-Seh as coming from the Biblical root Ayin-Sin-Hey which means to do. We have conveniently embedded the Rashi translation in the translation of the verse. The conjugation rule governing this Biblical word may be found by using table(s) 1 in the Ibn Shoshan dictionary for the Nifal mode.

    Very Advanced Rashi: There is a simple rule of grammar which states that
  • Always use the active mode (Qal)
  • Unless you wish to emphasize the activity vs. the person doing it in which case you use the Nifal or passive mode.

In this case by using the passive mode the verse emphasis is not, you shouldn't do work but rather the work should not be done. Hence the Rashi comment: The work should not be done whether by you or by someone else you hire. Both are prohibited on the holiday.

It is interesting that this rule of grammar is common to many languages.

    4. RASHI METHOD: ALIGNMENT
    BRIEF EXPLANATION: Aligning two almost identically worded verselets can suggest
    • (4a) 2 cases of the same incident or law
    • (4b) emphasis on the nuances of a case
    • (4c) use of broad vs literal usage of words
    This examples applies to Rashis Ex12-21c
    URL Reference: (c) http://www.Rashiyomi.com/w35n4.htm
    Brief Summary: God gave Moses 3 rules (a) One family = one sheep (b) one family= 2 houses = 2 sheeps; (c) 2 Families = one sheep. Moses summarized:HERDS FOR FAMILIES!

It would be helpful to read rule #9, Spreadsheets prior to reading this Rashi..

The table below presents an aligned extract of verses or verselets in Ex12-03:04, Ex12-21 Both verses/verselets discuss how groups form to eat the Passover lamb. The alignment justifies the Rashi comment that: The very general statement take flock for families stated by Moses corresponds to the three detailed statements given by God: (1) the family can comfortably consume one sheep; (2) There isn't enough meat in one sheep for the family which is too big but the family can divide into households each of which can comfortably consume one sheep (3) A household(or family) which consumed one sheep would leave over meat. In this case the house/family joins with neighbors until the group of neighbors can comfortably consume the entire sheep. Notice how God's three cases are summarized by Moses terse general case.

Verse Text of Verse Rashi comment
Ex12-03:04
    Verses Ex12-03:04 outline three stages in determining groups of people for the Passover lamb.
  • take a lamb per family ... [this is the ideal situation in which the number of people in the family can consume the entire lamb]
  • a lamb per house [Suppose there are too many people in the family - that is, if the entire family got together for Passover and one lamb is divided among them then there would not be enough food for each person - in such a case we break up the family by houses and each house eats one lamb]
  • and if the house is too small for a lamb...then he and his neighbor... [Suppose the number of the people in the house is too small; that is if the lamb would be divided among the people of the house and everyone ate as much as possible there would be leftovers; in such a case then multiple houses join]
The very general statement take flock for families stated by Moses corresponds to the three detailed statements given by God: (1) the family can comfortably consume one sheep; (2) There isn't enough meat in one sheep for the family which is too big but the family can divide into households each of which can comfortably consume one sheep (3) A household(or family) which consumed one sheep would leave over meat. In this case the house/family joins with neighbors until the group of neighbors can comfortably consume the entire sheep. Notice how God's three cases are summarized by Moses terse general case.
Ex12-21 Moses commanded the people take flock for your families.

Advanced Rashi: I have called this an alignment but I have only aligned one phrase. The Table below shows the alignment of the two passages - the command by God and the delivery of that command by Moses - in more detail. We have only concentrated on one row of this alignment. It is interesting how Moses summarized the three cases in one terse statement. Upon reviewing the alignment below we see many interesting differences some of which are not commented on by Rashi. As we have explained in this email newsletter it is very important to regard Rashi as sketching one or two illustrations of basic ideas which the teacher is expected to extend and generalize.

Ex12-03:07 Ex12-21:22
let them take drag and take
(1) lamb per family (2) lamb per house (3) ...he and neighbors flock per famailies
unblemished in its first year...watch it until the 14th and then slaguther it at noon slaughter it as a Passover sacrifice
take its blood and place on two doorposts and overhead bar take a hyssop bundle and dip in the blood in the bowl and touch the overhead bar and two doorposts

      5. RASHI METHOD: CONTRADICTION
      BRIEF EXPLANATION:Rashi resolves contradictory verses using 3 methods.
      • (5a) Resolution using two aspects of the same event
      • (5b) Resolution using two stages of the same process
      • (5c) Resolution using broad-literal interpretation.
      This example applies to Rashis Ex12-48a
      URL Reference: (c) http://www.Rashiyomi.com/w35n4.htm
      Brief Summary: For a convert to bring a Passover sacrifice they must both a) circumcise and b) bring it on the proper date.

The table below presents two contradictory verses / verselets. Both verses speak about a convert bringing a Passover sacrifice The underlined words highlight the contradiction. One verse says let him circumcise and then he brings his Passover sacrifice while the other verse states he will be like other citizens (who bring their sacrifice on their Passover sacrifice on the 14th.) We see the contradiction---which is it? Does a convert bring a personal Passover offering immediately upon conversion and circumcision or does he only bring Passover offerings on 14 Nissan like other Jewish citizens. Rashi simply resolves this contradiction using the 2 stages method: First the convert must circumcise and second the 14th of Nissan must come so that he may participate with everyone else. However if the 14th came and he did not yet circumcise he may not participate in the passover offering. The convert does not bring a personal Passover offering immediately after circumcision.

Summary Verse / Source Text of verse / Source
Circumcision is the prerequisite for a convert bringing the Passover offering Ex12-48a And when a stranger shall sojourn with you [convert], and will keep the Passover to the Lord, let all his males be circumcised, and then let him come near and keep it;
He is like other citizens (Who bring the offering on Nissan 14) Ex12-48 and he shall be like citizens; for no uncircumcised person shall eat of it.
Resolution: 2 Stages First the convert must circumcise and second the 14th of Nissan must come so that he may participate with everyone else. However if the 14th came and he did not yet circumcise he may not participate in the passover offering. The convert does not bring a personal Passover offering immediately after circumcision.

Advanced Rashi: The contradiction here was not very deep. The resolution you need both circumcision and the 14th was sort of obvious. Rashi does have a subtle point - It might be the case that converts bring a personal Passover offering immediately upon conversion supplementing the national Passover offering. This personal offering would make sense since the conversion is an Exodus for the convert. It is also possibly implied by the Biblical text: ...then he shall offer it. Hence the resolution of Rashi that all Passover offerings are communal/national and brought on the 14th.

    6. RASHI METHOD: STYLE
    Rashi examines how rules of style influences inferences between general and detail statements in paragraphs.
    • Example: Every solo example stated by the Bible must be broadly generalized;
    • Theme-Detail: A general principle followed by an example is interpreted restrictively---the general theme statement only applies in the case of the example;
    • Theme-Detail-Theme: A Theme-Detail-Theme unit is interpreted as a paragraph. Consequently the details of the paragraph are generalized so that they are seen as illustrative of the theme.
    This examples applies to Rashis Ex12-27a
    URL Reference: (c) http://www.Rashiyomi.com/w35n4.htm
    Brief Summary: DETAIL: Passover WATCH IT. DETAIL: WHEN you come to Israel..,WATCH IT. DETAIL: WHEN your children ask ...RELATE IT. GENERAL: PRAISE BE GOD.

Certain Biblical paragraphs are stated in a detail-Theme form. In other words a detailed specific law is stated first followed by a thematic restatement of a broad general nature. Today's example illustrates this as shown below.

    Verse Ex12-21:27 discussing the command by Moses to the Jews to observe the Passover states
  • Detail: Then Moses called for all the elders of Israel, and said to them, Draw out and take a lamb ... And you shall watch this thing for an ordinance to you and to your sons forever.
  • Detail: And it shall come to pass, when you come to the land which the Lord will give you, ... that you shall watch this service
  • Detail: And it shall come to pass, when your children shall say to you, What do you mean by this service? That you shall say, It is the sacrifice of the Lord?s Passover, ...
  • General: And the people bowed (in appreciation) .

    Rashi sees the detail clause 1) observe this Passover, 2) observe Passover in Israel, 3) answer children's questions as describing attributes of the general clause, the people bowed in appreciation. Rashi states: The people expressed gratitude on three things:
  • (1) The observance of this Passover (That they would be freed from Egyptian tyranny)
  • (2) The entry to Israel and the observance of Passover there
  • (3) The continuation of the nation through children educated on Passover.

Advanced Rashi: Much ink has been spilled on this Rashi. Using the format technique we have made this Rashi extremely simple. The Biblical paragraph has 3 clauses and therefore the concluding statement The people bowed in appreciation refers back to the 3 clauses. Note especially the use of keywords to indicate the various detail subthemes. For example the phrase and it shall come to pass introduces the 2nd and 3rd details. Similarly the first and second paragraph terminate with you shall watch. Consequently I think the proper approach to this Rashi is not conceptual but formatting. Rashi is simply pointing out that there are three details- exodus, Israel and children.

    7. RASHI METHOD: FORMATTING
    BRIEF EXPLANATION:Inferences from Biblical formatting:
    • Use of repetition to indicate formatting effects: bold,italics,...;
    • use of repeated keywords to indicate a bullet effect;
    • rules governing use and interpretation of climactic sequence;
    • rules governing paragraph development and discourse
    This example applies to Rashis Ex12-35b
    URL Reference: (c) http://www.Rashiyomi.com/w35n4.htm
    Brief Summary: Jews obtained from Egyptians a)Silver, b) Gold c) Clothes. RASHI: Clothes were the more important.

The climax principle asserts that a sequence of similar phrases should be interpreted climactically even if the words and grammatical constructs used do not directly suggest this. That is the fact of the sequence justifies reading into the Biblical text a climactic interpretation even if no other textual source justifies it. For this reason we consider the climax method a distinct and separate method.

    Verse Ex12-35b discussing the gifts the Jews received when leaving Egypt is written in a climactic manner as shown. For convenience we have inserted the Rashi comments clarifying the nature of the climax in brackets And the people of Israel did according to the word of Moses; and they borrowed from the Egyptians
  • silver utensils [ ]
  • gold utensils [ ]
  • garments [ just as gold is more important than silver, so too the clothes were more important and useful than gold. Hence they are mentioned last. ]

Advanced Rashi: Rashi does not clarify further why clothing is more important than gold. Perhaps it is the simple theme that money is an end - the important thing is what you buy with the money.

On a deeper level I think the intent is that Egyptians had special types of clothes which were good for marriages and businesses. Here is one small example. Isiah mentions the exposes clothing. Apparently exposes were clothing with patterns of exposed holes so that a woman wearing them as lingerie would attract her husband. It could be conjectured that the Egyptians had clothing for marriage and business which helped people who wore them achieve their ends. In other words the Egyptians were national leaders in clothing manufacturer and their clothing products were highly regarded.

      8. RASHI METHOD: DATABASES
      BRIEF EXPLANATION:Rashi makes inferences from Database queries. The precise definition of database query has been identified in modern times with the 8 operations of Sequential Query Language (SQL).

      This example applies to Rashis Ex10-01a Ex07-15a Ex08-17b
      URL Reference: (c) http://www.Rashiyomi.com/w35n4.htm
      Brief Summary: The 10 plagues were an act of war by God: Plagues 1,4,7 cut off sea/land; plagues 2,5,8 humiliated the enemy; plagues 3,6,9 caused pain.

We ask the following database query: What are the common and different characteristics of the 10 plagues that God brought on Egypt. The reader is encouraged to perform the query using a standard Biblical Konnkordance or search engine. This database query yields the list below. The list justifies the following Rashi inference: The 10 plagues naturally organize into 3 groups: (a) Plagues 1,4,7 are attacks on Egyptian gods and a cut off of land and sea access.(b) Plagues 2,5,8 humiliated the Egyptians and took away their pride. (c) Plagues 3,6,9 caused the people pain. (d)The 10th plague culminated all and freed the Jews. This follows a military sequence of a) cut off of supplies b) causing confusion and fear and c) inflicting pain to induce surrender. The list below presents the results of the database query.

# Plague Verse Intro phrase Military tactic
1 Blood Ex07-15 At morn approach Pharoh on Nile Sea/air/deity cut off
4 Beasts Ex08-16 At morn approach Pharoh on Nile Sea/Air/deity cut off
7 Hail Ex09-13 At morn approach Pharoh on Nile Sea/Air/deity cut off
- ---- ------ ------ -----
2 Frogs Ex07-26 Come to Pharoh Humiliation
5 Plagues Ex09-01 Come to Pharoh Humiliation
8 Locust Ex10-01 Come to Pharoh Humiliation
- ---- ------ ------ -----
3 Lice Ex08-12 No intro phrase Unwarned pain
6 Boils Ex09-08 No intro phrase Unwarned pain
9 Darkness Ex11-21 No intro phrase Unwarned pain

    Advanced Rashi: Just to recap:
  • When waging war you 1st cut off spiritual, land and water access. The intro phrase In the morn Go to Pharoh on the Nile is basically a statement that the Egyptian water and god (Nile) would be cut off
  • After cutting off supplies you demoralize the enemy and rob them of their pride by humiliating them. The lack of pride facilitates surrender. Hence the introductory phrase Go visit Pharoh to emphasize an invasion of his personal air space.
  • Finally if the above doesn't work you inflict pain on the enemy to induce them to surrender. Consequently there is no introductory phrase to plagues 3,6,9 since the point is that you don't want to warn them and don't want them to prepare.
  • As indicated above, the 3rd, 6th and ninth plague involved infliction of pain. Hence there is no introductory passage And God said to Moses Come to Pharoh... The lack of such a communication intensifies the pain. By contrast the purpose of the other plagues was to cut off land-sea supplies and to humiliate the Egyptians - hence a verbal warning accompanied them. Consequently plagues 1,2,4,5,7,8 being with an introductory God said to Moses Go to Pharoh and tell him... In this case the communication intensifies the intended humiliation.

The above analysis was started by Rashi and complemented by Rabbi Hirsch. Much more could be said but the above table paves the way for further analysis.

      9. RASHI METHOD: NonVerse
      BRIEF EXPLANATION: The common denominator of the 3 submethods of the NonVerse method is that inferences are made from non textual material. The 3 submethods are as follows:
      • Spreadsheet: Rashi makes inferences of a numerical nature that can be summarized in a traditional spreadsheet
      • Geometric: Rashi clarifies a Biblical text using descriptions of geometric diagrams
      • Fill-ins: Rashi supplies either real-world background material or indicates real-world inferences from a verse. The emphasis here is on the real-world, non-textual nature of the material.
      This examples applies to Rashis Ex12-03d Ex12-04a
      URL Reference: (c) http://www.Rashiyomi.com/w35n4.htm
      Brief Summary: Three stages 1) Family can consume one sheep; 2) Family too big; sheep per house 3) Sheep too big; multiple houses.

Reading rule #9 will facilitate understanding rule #4, which can be read after this.

    Verses Ex12-03:04 outline three stages in determining groups of people for the Passover lamb.
  • a lamb per family [this is the ideal situation in which the number of people in the family can consume the entire lamb]
  • lamb per house [Suppose there are too many people in the family - that is, if the entire family got together for Passover and one lamb is divided among them then there would not be enough food for each person - in such a case we break up the family by houses and each house eats one lamb]
  • and if the house is too small for a lamb...then he and his neighbor... [Suppose the number of the people in the house is too small; that is if the lamb would be divided among the people of the house and everyone ate as much as possible there would be leftovers; in such a case then multiple houses join]