The 10 RashiYomi Rules
Their presence in Rashis on Parshat Lech LeChaH
Volume 13, Number 12
Rashi is Simple - Volume 36 Number 12

Used in the weekly Rashi-is-Simple and the Daily Rashi.
Visit the RashiYomi website: http://www.Rashiyomi.com/
(c) RashiYomi Incorporated, Dr. Hendel, President,
Oct 29th 2009

The goal of this Weekly Rashi Digest is to use the weekly Torah portion to expose students at all levels to the ten major methods of commentary used by Rashi. It is hoped that continual weekly exposure to these ten major methods will enable students of all levels to acquire a familiarity and facility with the major exegetical methods.

FULL HOUSE THIS WEEK, ALL RASHI RULES ILLUSTRATED

    1. RASHI METHOD: REFERENCES
    BRIEF EXPLANATION: Commentary on a verse is provided thru a cross-reference to another verse. The cross references can either provide
    • (1a) further details,
    • (1b) confirm citations, or
    • (1c) clarify word meaning.
    This examples applies to Rashis Gn16-12a
    URL Reference: (c) http://www.Rashiyomi.com/rule1312.htm
    Brief Summary: The statement HE WILL BE A WILD MAN (Gn16-12a) references Gn20-20 HE WAS A DESERT HUNTER

Verse Gn16-12a discussing Ishmael states And he shall be a wild human his hand shall be against every man, and every man's hand against him; and he shall dwell in the face of all his brethren.' Rashi notes that the underlined words, a wild human references verses Gn21-20 discussing Ishmael's dwelling in the deserts where he was known as a hunter. Hence the Rashi comment The angel's promise to Hagar, Gn16-12a that her son Ishmael would be a wild man references Gn21-20:21 which describes Ishmael as a desert archer.

Text of Target Verse Gn16-12a Text of Reference Verse Gn21-20
And he shall be a wild human his hand shall be against every man, and every man's hand against him; and he shall dwell in the face of all his brethren.' ... And God was with the lad; and he grew, and lived in the desert, and became an archer
Rashi comments: The angel's promise to Hagar, Gn16-12a that her son Ishmael would be a wild man references Gn21-20:21 which describes Ishmael as a desert archer.

      2. RASHI METHOD: WORD MEANING
      BRIEF EXPLANATION: The meaning of words can be explained either by
      • (2a) translating an idiom, a group of words whose collective meaning transcends the meaning of its individual component words,
      • (2b) explaining the nuances and commonality of synonyms-homographs,
      • (2c) describing the usages of connective words like also,because,if-then, when,
      • (2d) indicating how grammatical conjugation can change word meaning
      • (2e) changing word meaning using the figures of speech common to all languages such as irony and oxymorons.
      This examples applies to Rashis Gn14-02a
      URL Reference: (c) http://www.Rashiyomi.com/rule1312.htm
      Brief Summary: BERAH = Beth RA = 2 Evils = Bad 1) to God and bad 2) to man

There are 10 Rashi subrules by which meaning is presented. One such rule imparts meaning by etymologies. Etymologies in turn can be derived by breaking up the root into component roots. Such a breaking up does not mean that Rashi did not believe in the triliteral theory (3-letter root theory). As I have explained many times Rashi believed that grammatical conjugation was governed by three letter roots but that semantic conjugation, the explanation of meaning is governed by one and two letter roots. So it did not bother Rashi that he could simultaneously believe in 3 and 2 letter roots.

Verse Gn14-02 mentions King Berah - Beth-Resh-Ayin. Rashi explains the etymology of Berah - Beth-Resh-Ayin as Beth Resh-Ayin or Beth Rah which means 2 evils. Hence the Rashi comment King Berah was known as the 2-evil person: He went out of his way to be evil to both people and God.

      3. RASHI METHOD: GRAMMAR
      BRIEF EXPLANATION: Rashi explains verses using grammar principles, that is, rules which relate reproducable word form to word meaning. Grammatical rules neatly fall into 3 categories
      • (a) the rules governing conjugation of individual words,Biblical roots,
      • (b) the rules governing collections of words,clauses, sentences
      • (c) miscellaneous grammatical, or form-meaning, rules.
      This examples applies to Rashis Gn13-12a
      URL Reference: (c) http://www.Rashiyomi.com/rule1312.htm
      Brief Summary: Lot DWELLED in the plain cities but TENTED [for his livestock and staff] till Sedom.

Today Hebrew grammar is well understood and there are many books on it. Rashi, however, lived before the age of grammar books. A major Rashi method is therefore the teaching of basic grammar.

Many students belittle this aspect of Rashi. They erroneously think that because of modern methods we know more. However Rashi will frequently focus on rare grammatical points not covered in conventional textbooks.

    There are many classical aspects to grammar whether in Hebrew or other languages. They include
  • The rules for conjugating verbs. These rules govern how you differentiate person, plurality, tense, mode, gender, mood, and designation of the objects and indirect objects of the verb. For example how do you conjugate, in any language, I sang, we will sing, we wish to sing, she sang it.
  • Rules of agreement. For example agreement of subject and verb, of noun and adjective; whether agreement in gender or plurality.
  • Rules of Pronoun reference.
  • Rules of word sequence. This is a beautiful topic which is not always covered in classical grammatical textbooks.

    Today we deal with the rules of transforming nouns into verbs. Although most conjugation rules refer to the conjugation of verbs, there are also conjugation rules for transfroming nouns into verbs. We list several common methods for transforming nouns into verbs:
  • create the noun: e.g. to flower
  • remove the noun: e.g. to dust
  • use the noun: e.g. to hammer
  • the verb(activity) done to this noun: e.g. Dt21-04b: neck the calf in other words kill it with a blow to the neck

Applying this rule we see that the verb form to tent would mean creating tents or doing the normal activity of tents, pitching them. Hence the following Rashi-verse combination: Gn13-12a Abram dwelt in the land of Canaan, and Lot dwelt in the cities of the Plain, but tented as far as Sodom. Rashi: He dwelt in the Plain Cities, but he tented, that is pitched many tents for his numerous livestock and staff and these tents reached to Sedom.

    4. RASHI METHOD: ALIGNMENT
    BRIEF EXPLANATION: Aligning two almost identically worded verselets can suggest
    • (4a) 2 cases of the same incident or law
    • (4b) emphasis on the nuances of a case
    • (4c) use of broad vs literal usage of words
    This examples applies to Rashis Gn15-17b,c
    URL Reference: (c) http://www.Rashiyomi.com/rule1312.htm
    Brief Summary: a) The sun sank [Sunset] b) and there was steathliness [Nightfall] c) and a furnace fire....swept the cut pieces

The table below presents an aligned extract of verses or verselets in Gn15-17b Gn15-17c Both verses/verselets discuss nightfall. The alignment justifies the Rashi comment that: The sun sank refers to sunset while there was steathliness refers to Nightfall. More probably this symbolizes that the destruction of the nations of power - symbolized by furance fire that devoured the power animals - would not occur till the Jews were totally helpless symbolized by the setting of the sun and the fall of total nightfall. And just then when the Jews had lost all light and were confounded in stealth, just then God would send a furnace fire to devour the nations of power that had attacked us.

Verse Text of Verse Rashi comment
Gn15-17
    And it came to pass, that,
  • when the sun sank, [Sunset]and
  • there was steathliness, [nightfall]
  • behold a smoking furnace, and a flaming torch that passed between these pieces.
The sun sank refers to sunset while there was steathliness refers to Nightfall. More probably this symbolizes that the destruction of the nations of power - symbolized by furance fire that devoured the power animals - would not occur till the Jews were totally helpless symbolized by the setting of the sun and the fall of total nightfall. And just then when the Jews had lost all light and were confounded in stealth, just then God would send a furnace fire to devour the nations of power that had attacked us.
Gn15-17
    And it came to pass, that,
  • when the sun sank, [Sunset]and
  • there was steathliness, [nightfall]
  • behold a smoking furnace, and a flaming torch that passed between these pieces.

      5. RASHI METHOD: CONTRADICTION
      BRIEF EXPLANATION:Rashi resolves contradictory verses using 3 methods.
      • (5a) Resolution using two aspects of the same event
      • (5b) Resolution using two stages of the same process
      • (5c) Resolution using broad-literal interpretation.
      This examples applies to Rashis Gn12-08c
      URL Reference: (c) http://www.Rashiyomi.com/rule1312.htm
      Brief Summary: a) The pronounced text says: He pitched HIS tent b) The written text says: He pitched HER tent Rashi: FIRST he pitched HER tent, then HIS own.

Background: The Rashi student who wishes to understand the following Rashi should be aware that in certain rare verses there are two versions in the Masoretic text which lists a way to pronounce the text and a way to write the text. In most verses the pronunced and written text are the same.

The table below presents two contradictory verses/verselets. Both verses/verselets talk about the tent that Abraham pitched. Actually here we deal with one verse that has a different written and pronounced version. The underlined words highlight the contradiction. The pronounced verse says he pitched his tent while the written verse says he pitched her tent. Which is it? Did he pitch her tent or his tent? Rashi simply resolves this using the 2 stages method: First, he pitched her tent (his wife's tent), and then, after she was settled, he pitched his own tent.

Summary Verse / Source Text of verse / Source
He pitched his tent. Gn12-08a pronounced version he pitched his tent
He pitched her tent Gn12-08a written version he pitched her tent
Resolution: 2 Aspects First, he pitched her tent (his wife's tent), and then, after she was settled, he pitched his own tent.

    6. RASHI METHOD: STYLE
    Rashi examines how rules of style influences inferences between general and detail statements in paragraphs.
    • Example: Every solo example stated by the Bible must be broadly generalized;
    • Theme-Detail: A general principle followed by an example is interpreted restrictively---the general theme statement only applies in the case of the example;
    • Theme-Detail-Theme: A Theme-Detail-Theme unit is interpreted as a paragraph. Consequently the details of the paragraph are generalized so that they are seen as illustrative of the theme.
    This examples applies to Rashis Gn13-10a Gn13-10c Gn13-10d
    URL Reference: (c) http://www.Rashiyomi.com/rule1312.htm
    Brief Summary: GENERAL: The Jordan peninsula was FULLY WATERED. DETAIL 1: Like the Garden of Eden - [Good for TREES] DETAIL 2: Like Egypt - [Good for PLANTS (like flax)]

Certain Biblical paragraphs are stated in a Theme-Development form. In other words a broad general idea is stated first followed by the development of this broad general theme in specific details. The Theme-Detail form creates a unified paragraph and consequently the law or narrative statement only applies to the enumerated details but not to other cases. The rule of thumb is that if you state a single statement then that statement should be perceived as an example which should be Generalized. On the other hand if you want to emphasize that what you are saying only applies to the examples listed then you would use a theme detail format thereby indicating that from all instances of the general theme only the details you listed apply. Today's example illustrates this as shown below.

    Verses Gn13-10 discussing the fertility of the Jordan peninsula states
    • General: Lot saw that the Jordan plain ...was completely watered
    • Detail 1: ...like the Garden of Eden [which was known for its trees (Gn01-09,16)]
    • Detail 2: ...like Egypt [which was known for its plants like flax (Gn09-31:32)
    The general clause states that the plain was well watered and could mean refer for example to beautiful fountains. The detail clause provides specificity to the general clause and describes how it should be interpreted: It was well watered for the production of trees and plants.

      7. RASHI METHOD: FORMATTING
      BRIEF EXPLANATION:Inferences from Biblical formatting: --bold,italics, and paragraph structure.
      • Use of repetition to indicate formatting effects: bold,italics,...;
      • use of repeated keywords to indicate a bullet effect;
      • rules governing use and interpretation of climactic sequence;
      • rules governing paragraph development and discourse
      This example applies to Rashis Gn15-12a Gn16-12b Gn16-12c Gn16-12d
      URL Reference: (c) http://www.Rashiyomi.com/rule1312.htm
      Brief Summary: Ishmael is a) wild b) with a hand everywhere (even if it doesn't belong to him) c) all hands on him (in hatred) but d) dwelling everywhere (overcoming the hatred)

The climax principle asserts that a sequence of similar phrases should be interpreted climactically even if the words and grammatical constructs used do not directly suggest this. That is the fact of the sequence justifies reading into the Biblical text a climactic interpretation even if no other textual source justifies it. For this reason we consider the climax method a distinct and separate method.

    Verse Gn12-16 discussing Ishmael is written in a climactic manner as shown. For convenience we have inserted the Rashi comments clarifying the nature of the climax in brackets
  • He will be a wild person [ dwelling in deserts and hunting ]
  • his hands everywhere [ Even if it doesn't belong to him ]
  • and all hands on him [ in hatred ]
  • and he will dwell against all his brethern. [ Despite the hatred and theft he will be a great, mighty, numerous nation. ]

Advanced Rashi: The verse is not necessarily perjorative on Ishmael. Let us not forget that his name means God hears prayer. The verse has applicability to the modern setting both to the hostile Arabs, such as terrorists and to the friendly Arabs. The key characteristics of both are a)a hunting type approach, b) over-permeation in all places, and despite c) animosity to their over-encroachment d) they have (Divinely promised) numerosity. The characteristics mentioned in this verse can be used to facilitate understanding of both friendly and hostile Arabs. As is our custom on this list we abstain from detailed or modern political applications and focus on pure Biblical interpretation.

      8. RASHI METHOD: DATABASES
      BRIEF EXPLANATION:Rashi makes inferences from Database queries. The precise definition of database query has been identified in modern times with the 8 operations of Sequential Query Language (SQL).

      This example applies to Rashis Gn15-12a
      URL Reference: (c) http://www.Rashiyomi.com/w33n5.htm
      Brief Summary: God communicates prophecy with accompanying symbols - a dark dream symbolizes exile and despair.

We ask the following database query: When God prophesies does he use accompanying symbols? The reader is encouraged to perform the query using a standard Biblical Konnkordance or search engine. This database query yields the list below. The list justifies the following Rashi inference: When God prophesies he uses accompanying symbols reinforcing the prohpetic message. For example God prophesied to Abraham about the exile and alien status of his children in foreign lands. God accompanied this prohpecy with a dark dream to symbolize the darkness of exile. The list below presents the results of the database query.

Verses Prophecy Symbolic Support Meaning of Symbol
Jr01-11:12 Speedy punishment Almond (Shin-Kuph-Daleth) vision Almonds are the speedieth (Shin-Kuph-Daleth) plan to blossom
Jr01-13:17 Northern attack Boiling pot in north Boils/plagues begin in north
Ez03-01:03 Requirement to prophesy as ordered Consumed book vision Absord these book principles internally!
Nu17-16:24 Priesthood belongs to Aaron Sprouting branch Sprouting tribe (Hebrew Shin Beth Daleth = branch=tribal branch)
Gn15-12 Prophesy of Jewish Exile Big Darkness Darkness/Bleakness of exile

    9. RASHI METHOD: SPREADSHEETS
    BRIEF EXPLANATION: The common denominator of the 3 submethods of the Spreadsheet method is that inferences are made from non textual material. The 3 submethods are as follows:
    • Spreadsheet: Rashi makes inferences of a numerical nature that can be summarized in a traditional spreadsheet
    • Geometric: Rashi clarifies a Biblical text using descriptions of geometric diagrams
    • Fill-ins: Rashi supplies either real-world background material or indicates real-world inferences from a verse. The emphasis here is on the real-world, non-textual nature of the material.
    This examples applies to Rashis Gn12-08b
    URL Reference: (c) http://www.Rashiyomi.com/rule1312.htm
    Brief Summary: As we go from WEST to EAST we have BETHEL was on WEST, then Abraham's place of campling, and then AI was on EAST So Abraham camped EAST of BETHEL which was on the WEST.

Verse Gn12-08b discussing where Abraham camped on his journeys states And he removed from thence unto the mountain on the east of Beth-el, and pitched his tent, having Beth-el on the west, and Ai on the east; and he builded there an altar unto HaShem, and called upon the name of HaShem. Rashi clarifies using the diagram below. As we go from west to east we have BethEl, Abraham's Campplace, Ai. It follows that Abraham's campplace was east of Bethel which was in the west.


------------------------------------------------------
BethEl             Abraham's Campground           Ai
WEST                                              EAST
------------------------------------------------------

Rashi: Abraham's campground was east of BethEl
which was in the west.

Advanced Rashi: Actually BethEl and Ai are not on the same latitute. But the above picture suffices to illustrate the intent of the verse and Rashi's point.

      10. RASHI METHOD: SYMBOLISM
      BRIEF EXPLANATION: Rashi provides symbolic interpretations of words, verses, and chapters. Rashi can symbolically interpret either
      • (10a) entire Biblical chapters such as the gifts of the princes, Nu07
      • (10b) individual items, verses and words
      The rules governing symbolism and symbolic interpretation are presented in detail on my website.

      This examples applies to Rashis Gn15-10a
      URL Reference: (c) http://www.Rashiyomi.com/rule1312.htm
      Brief Summary: Abraham was instructed to cut in half the animals - the calf, goat and ram but not to cut the bird. This symbolized that nations of power (calf,goat,ram) would split up but nations of spirit(Bird) would live on.

The so-called convenant of the cuts between God and Israel Gn15-09:20 required Abraham to take 3 animals - 3 calves, 3 goats and 3 rams - and two birds. Abraham cut the animals in half but did not cut the birds. These 3 animals symbolized nations involved in power whether nations known for their work and productivity (calf-ox family), nations known for their leadership capacity (ram vs. sheep), or nations known for their stubbornness and tenacity in sticking to their traditions and culture (goat.) By splitting these animals in half Abraham symbolized that the nations of power would ultimately split up and vanish. On the other hands nations of the spirit (birds, creatures of the winds and spirit) despite their lack of power, were not split, symbolically affirming they would survive. And indeed historically, the Jews, a people of the spirit, have survived, while many more powerful nations have been split up. The secret of the Jews is that they are bonded by a spiritual commonality rather than by a geo-cultural-political commonality.

Conclusion

This week's parshah contains examples of all the Rashi methods. Visit the RashiYomi website at http://www.Rashiyomi.com for further details and examples.