The 10 RashiYomi Rules
Their presence in Rashis on Parshat MishPaTiM
Volume 14, Number 2
Rashi is Simple - Volume 37 Number 2

Used in the weekly Rashi-is-Simple and the Daily Rashi.
Visit the RashiYomi website: http://www.Rashiyomi.com/
(c) RashiYomi Incorporated, Dr. Hendel, President,
Feb. 11, 2010

The goal of this Weekly Rashi Digest is to use the weekly Torah portion to expose students at all levels to the ten major methods of commentary used by Rashi. It is hoped that continual weekly exposure to these ten major methods will enable students of all levels to acquire a familiarity and facility with the major exegetical methods.

    1. RASHI METHOD: REFERENCES
    BRIEF EXPLANATION: Commentary on a verse is provided thru a cross-reference to another verse. The cross references can either provide
    • (1a) further details,
    • (1b) confirm citations, or
    • (1c) clarify word meaning.
    This examples applies to Rashis Ex24-13a
    URL Reference: (c) http://www.Rashiyomi.com/rule1402.htm
    Brief Summary: The statement MOSES AND JOSHUA AROSE (Ex24-13a) REFERENCES verse Ex32-17 implying Joshua was not with the nation. He probably accompanied Moses and waited.

Verse Ex24-12:13a discussing Moses ascent to the mountain of God states And the Lord said to Moses, Come up to me into the mount, and be there; and I will give you tablets of stone, and the Torah, and commandments which I have written; that you may teach them. And Moses , and his apprentice Joshua rose up; and Moses went up into the mount of God. Rashi notes that the underlined words, and his apprentice Joshua references verses Ex32-17 discussing Moses and Joshua trying to figure out what the commotion in the camp was about. Hence the Rashi comment The contrastive statements in Ex24-12:13 that 1) both Moses and Joshua arose but 2) only Moses went up to the mountain, are illuminated by Ex32-17 which shows Moses and Joshua discussing what is causing the commotion in the camp. Consequently we infer that Joshua was neither on the mountain with Moses nor in the camp with the people. Most probably he, as Moses' personal apprentice, accompanied Moses to the mountain borders, set up tent, and waited for Moses' return after 40 days as well as prepared items for Moses when he returned.

Text of Target Verse Ex18-12:13 Text of Reference Verse Ex32-17:19
And the Lord said to Moses, Come up to me into the mount, and be there; and I will give you tablets of stone, and the Torah, and commandments which I have written; that you may teach them. And Moses , and his apprentice Joshua rose up; and Moses went up into the mount of God. And when Joshua heard the noise of the people as they shouted, he said to Moses, There is a sound like war in the camp. And he said, It is not a victory cry or a wailing cry.... And it came to pass, as soon as he came near to the camp, that ....
Rashi comments: The contrastive statements in Ex24-12:13 that 1) both Moses and Joshua arose but 2) only Moses went up to the mountain, are illuminated by Ex32-17 which shows Moses and Joshua discussing what is causing the commotion in the camp. Consequently we infer that Joshua was neither on the mountain with Moses nor in the camp with the people. Most probably he, as Moses' personal apprentice, accompanied Moses to the mountain borders, set up tent, and waited for Moses' return after 40 days as well as prepared items for Moses when he returned.

      2. RASHI METHOD: WORD MEANING
      BRIEF EXPLANATION: The meaning of words can be explained either by
      • (2a) translating an idiom, a group of words whose collective meaning transcends the meaning of its individual component words,
      • (2b) explaining the nuances and commonality of synonyms-homographs,
      • (2c) describing the usages of connective words like also,because,if-then, when,
      • (2d) indicating how grammatical conjugation can change word meaning
      • (2e) changing word meaning using the figures of speech common to all languages such as irony and oxymorons.
      This examples applies to Rashis Ex24-14d
      URL Reference: (c) http://www.Rashiyomi.com/rule1402.htm
      Brief Summary: BAAL DAVAR (literally, OWNER OF AN ISSUE) is an IDIOM meaning a CIVIL CLAIM.

An idiom is a collection of words which means more than the sum of the meanings of each of the phrases' individual words. Verse Ex24-14d discussing Moses leaving Aaron and Chur to deal with the nation while he received the law states And he said to the elders, Wait here for us, until we come again to you; and, behold, Aaron and Hur are with you; if anyone owns an issue [has a civil claim] let him come to them. Rashi explains: The phrase(s) owns an issue is an idiom meaning civil claim. As can be seen from the underlined words the Rashi comment is compactly and explicitly combined in the Biblical text.

Advanced Rashi: One can never prove the meaning of an idiom since by definition the idiom means more than the sum of the meaning of its words. However there are other verses where the Hebrew Daleth-Beth-Resh, Davar means legal matter: e.g. Ex18-13:16 states And it came to pass on the next day, that Moses sat to judge the people, and the people stood by Moses from the morning to the evening. And when Moses’ father-in-law saw all that he did to the people, he said, What is this thing that you do to the people? Why do you sit by yourself alone, and all the people stand by you from morning to evening? And Moses said to his father-in-law, Because the people come to me to inquire of God; When they have a matter [daleth-beth-resh, legal matter], they come to me; and I judge between one and another, and I make them know the statutes of God, and his laws.

      3. RASHI METHOD: GRAMMAR
      BRIEF EXPLANATION: Rashi explains verses using grammar principles, that is, rules which relate reproducable word form to word meaning. Grammatical rules neatly fall into 3 categories
      • (a) the rules governing conjugation of individual words,Biblical roots,
      • (b) the rules governing collections of words,clauses, sentences
      • (c) miscellaneous grammatical, or form-meaning, rules.
      This examples applies to Rashis Ex23-31c
      URL Reference: (c) http://www.Rashiyomi.com/rule1402.htm
      Brief Summary: The plural direct object in Hebrew is traditionally indicated by a suffix MEM - e.g. Gerash = expel; GerasheM = expel THEM. However the suffix form (TAUV) MEM VAV can also be used.

Today Hebrew grammar is well understood and there are many books on it. Rashi, however, lived before the age of grammar books. A major Rashi method is therefore the teaching of basic grammar.

Many students belittle this aspect of Rashi. They erroneously think that because of modern methods we know more. However Rashi will frequently focus on rare grammatical points not covered in conventional textbooks.

    There are many classical aspects to grammar whether in Hebrew or other languages. They include
  • The rules for conjugating verbs. These rules govern how you differentiate person, plurality, tense, mode, gender, mood, and designation of the objects and indirect objects of the verb. For example how do you conjugate, in any language, I sang, we will sing, we wish to sing, she sang it.
  • Rules of agreement. For example agreement of subject and verb, of noun and adjective; whether agreement in gender or plurality.
  • Rules of Pronoun reference.
  • Rules of word sequence. This is a beautiful topic which is not always covered in classical grammatical textbooks.

Today we deal with the Biblical rules governing indication of a plural direct object. In Hebrew the plural direct object can be indicated by a suffix Mem. For example, Garesh means to expel while GeresheM means to expel them.

Biblical Hebrew also allows use of the suffix Mem-Vav or Tauv-Mem-Vav to indicate the plural direct object. So Gerashtamo also means expel them.

Similarly the Hebrew Lamed-Mem-Vav, Lamo can substitute for the more frequently used Lamed-Hey-Mem, Lahem which indicates the plural indirect object, to them. Examples of this plural indirect object may be found about 5 dozen times in the Bible e.g. in Dt32-32:33,36.
    4. RASHI METHOD: ALIGNMENT
    BRIEF EXPLANATION: Aligning two almost identically worded verselets can suggest
    • (4a) 2 cases of the same incident or law
    • (4b) emphasis on the nuances of a case
    • (4c) use of broad vs literal usage of words
    This examples applies to Rashis Ex21-15a
    URL Reference: (c) http://www.Rashiyomi.com/rule1402.htm
    Brief Summary: a) Killing a person: Death penalty b) Killing an animal: Payment c) Smiting a person: Payment d) Smiting parents: Death Penalty

Verse Text of Verse Rashi comment
Ex21-15a
  • He who smites a parent shall die.
  • For killing a person: A death penalty
  • For killing an animal: Payment
  • For smiting a person: Payment
  • For smiting a parent: A death penalty
  • Lv24-17:19
    • He who smites the entire life of a person, shall die
    • He who smites the entire life of an animal, shall pay
    • He who causes a blemish in his colleague, as he did so shall be done to him.

    Advanced Rashi: The biblical phrase as he did so shall be done to him is ambiguous: It could mean he is liable for payment or, it could mean that he should be wounded the way he wounded someone else. The strongest proof that the Biblical intent is that payment shall be made comes from an explicit statement in Ex21-19: If he survives....he only need give disability and medical. This verse serves as a basis for interpreting other verses such as as he did so shall be done to him or an eye for an eye....a wound for a wound in terms of payment, i.e.as he did [in medical and disability damages] so shall be done to him [monetarily] or the [disability/medical payment] for an eye for wounding an eye....

        5. RASHI METHOD: CONTRADICTION
        BRIEF EXPLANATION:Rashi resolves contradictory verses using 3 methods.
        • (5a) Resolution using two aspects of the same event
        • (5b) Resolution using two stages of the same process
        • (5c) Resolution using broad-literal interpretation.
        This examples applies to Rashis Ex24-07a
        URL Reference: (c) http://www.Rashiyomi.com/rule1402.htm
        Brief Summary: a) Moses gave written "pre-Sinaitic revelations" such as circumcision, Sabbath and the Creation stories prior to revelation b) The rest of the Torah was givenn after revelation.

    The table below presents two contradictory verses/verselets. Both verses speak about the Revelation. The underlined words highlight the contradiction. One verse/verselet says Moses gave the book of the convenant during the preparation for the revelation, while the other verse/verselet says God gave the Torah at the Revelation. We see the contradiction Which is it? Was the Torah given before or at/after the Revelation. If before the Revelation, then what was given at the Revelation! Rashi simply resolves this using the 2 Aspects method: a) Moses gave written Pre-Sinaitic revelations prior to the Revelation - during the preparatory phase right before the revelation. The Pre-Sinaitic revelations included the creation stories, the commandment of circumcision, the other Genesis stories, and the few commandments given to them at Marah such as Shabbos. b) The revelation brought with it (or over the next 40 years) the rest of the Torah.

    Summary Verse / Source Text of verse / Source
    Moses presented the book of the Convenant during the preparation for Revelation Ex24--01:07 And he said to Moses, Come up to the Lord, you, and Aaron,... And Moses alone shall come near the Lord; but they shall not come near; nor shall the people go up with him. And Moses came and told the people all the words of the Lord, and all the judgments; and all the people answered with one voice, and said, All the words which the Lord has said will we do. And Moses wrote all the words of the Lord, ... And he sent young men of the people of Israel, who offered burnt offerings, .... And Moses took half of the blood, .... And he took the Book of the Covenant, and read it in the hearing of the people; and they said, All that the Lord has said will we do, and obey.
    The Torah was given at Revelation. Ex24-12 And the Lord said to Moses, Come up to me into the mount, and be there; and I will give you tablets of stone [10 commandments], and the Torah, and commandments which I have written; that you may teach them.
    Resolution: 2 Aspects a) Moses gave written Pre-Sinaitic revelations prior to the Revelation - during the preparatory phase right before the revelation. The Pre-Sinaitic revelations included the creation stories, the commandment of circumcision, the other Genesis stories, and the few commandments given to them at Marah such as Shabbos. b) The revelation brought with it (or over the next 40 years) the rest of the Torah.

    Advanced Rashi: It might be appropriate to discuss certain aspects of the heretical cricism of the Bible. Using archaelogical and linguistic methods it is shown that portions of the Torah are written much earlier than 2048 BC when the Torah was given. Since these passages have styles from significantly older periods it is argued that they were not given at the time of the giving of the Torah.

    But there is no orthodox position that Moses wrote the entire Torah. For example the chapter on circumcision was clearly written by Abraham who was also a prophet dictating God's words - Abraham wrote this chapter 400 years earlier. Similarly Adam probably wrote the story of Paradise and the expulsion since Adam was a prophet. Adam's prophecies are 2000 years older than the Torah.

    What the orthodox position claims is that Moses is the final prophetic authority. True Abraham wrote the chapter on circumcision but we today observe this commandment because Moses finalized it (at the word of God) and included it in the final Torah.

    The giving of the Torah is a statement about the final binding authority to prophetic revelation - it is not a statement of authorship or original versions. So we should expect that portions of the Torah have styles from an earlier period. Such discoveries support, not contradict, the orthodox position.

      6. RASHI METHOD: STYLE
      Rashi examines how rules of style influences inferences between general and detail statements in paragraphs.
      • Example: Every solo example stated by the Bible must be broadly generalized;
      • Theme-Detail: A general principle followed by an example is interpreted restrictively---the general theme statement only applies in the case of the example;
      • Theme-Detail-Theme: A Theme-Detail-Theme unit is interpreted as a paragraph. Consequently the details of the paragraph are generalized so that they are seen as illustrative of the theme.
      This examples applies to Rashis Ex22-03b
      URL Reference: (c) http://www.Rashiyomi.com/w33n9.htm
      GENERAL: On any dispute DETAILS: On oxen, on donkeys, on kids, on garments [movables of value] GENERAL: Any dispute of ownership That comes before the court for payment of double.

    Certain Biblical paragraphs are stated in a Theme-Development-Theme form. In other words a broad general idea is stated first followed by the development of this broad general theme in specific details. The paragraph-like unit is then closed with a repetition of the broad theme. The Theme-Detail-Theme form creates a unified paragraph. The detailed section of this paragraph is therefore seen as an extension of the general theme sentences. Today's example illustrates this as shown immediately below.

      Biblical verses Ex22-08 form a Biblical paragraph with a theme-detail-theme structure. The paragraph discusses on which theft disputes is there a fine of double payment.
      • General: On any dispute of transgression
      • Detail:
        • On oxen
        • On donkeys
        • on sheep/goat kids
        • on garments
      • General: On any loss on which he says "This is it"...it will come to court....if convicted he will pay double

    Rashi generalizes the detail clause oxen, donkeys, kids, and garments as illustrative of the general clause, disputes of transgression and states: This double-fine law applies to all disputes of movables of worth whether living, like oxen, or non living, like garments. The law does not apply to disputes of real-estate which is dissimilar to oxen, donkeys, kids and garments, and it similarly does not apply to bonds and IOUs which do not have intrinsic worth like oxen, donkeys, kids and garments.

      7. RASHI METHOD: FORMATTING
      BRIEF EXPLANATION:Inferences from Biblical formatting: --bold,italics, and paragraph structure.
      • Use of repetition to indicate formatting effects: bold,italics,...;
      • use of repeated keywords to indicate a bullet effect;
      • rules governing use and interpretation of climactic sequence;
      • rules governing paragraph development and discourse
      This example applies to Rashis Ex19-12c
      URL Reference: (c) http://www.Rashiyomi.com/rule1402.htm
      Brief Summary: Regarding female minor slaves: a) He can marry her b) He can arrange for monetary redemption (based on remaining years) c) He can allow his son to marry her If not she goes free at puberty.

    We have explained in our article Biblical Formatting located on the world wide web at http://www.Rashiyomi.com/biblicalformatting.pdf, that the Biblical Author indicated bullets by using repeating keywords.

    That is, if a modern author wanted to get a point across using bullets - a list of similar but contrastive items - then the Biblical Author would use repeating keywords. Today's verse illustrates this principle.

    Bullets whether indicated through modern notation or through the Biblical method of repeating keywords always indicate contrastive emphasis - that is, each bullet is presumed to be a distinct item contrasted to the other items on the list. Very often the bullets are also used to indicate that the entire list is exhaustive of some spectrum.

    At times the bullet structure is not indicated through repeating keywords but rather through an explicit biblical enumerative statement. Today's verses illustrate this.

      Verse(s) Ex21-07:11 discussing the freedom of a minor girl sold as a slave states And if a man sells his daughter to be a maidservant, ....
      • (1) If she pleases not her master, who has designated her for himself,
      • (2) then shall he let her be redeemed; ....
      • (3) And if he has designated her to his son, he shall ....
      • ---------------------------------------------------
      • And if he does not do these three things to her, then (4)she shall go out free without payment of money.
      The explicit enumerative phrase these three things to her identifies three methods of freedom which we have bulleted. These three methods are discovered through reading the passage and identifying and enumerating separate methods of freedom. The three methods are
      • (1) marriage to the master,
      • (2) allowing redemption (by paying off an amount proportional to the years left - so that a girl sold at age 6 for $60,000 would be able to go free at age 8 by her father paying back $40,000)
      • (3) Allowing marriage to his son.
      If these three methods are not done then (4)she shall go out, at the commencement of adulthood/puberty, without any payment.

    Advanced Rashi: Much more could be said about this Rashi but the above will suffice for now. We point out that the institution of minor female slavery is poorly understood. It was only allowed in conditions of absolute poverty. Such poverty typically gave rise to death and/or prostitution. The Torah allowed instead a private deal whereby the girl was promised marriage and board with a private owner. If however upon reaching puberty neither the owner nor the son liked the girl and would not marry her, and if her father was not in the meantime able to make the money needed to pay back the owner, then puberty set her free automatically.

    Note especially that the owner did not really own her. So for example if she was sold at age 6 for $60,0000 and her father made back the money he could redeeem her for $40,000 two years later - in other words, the father's redemption rights took precedence over the owners ownership - that is, the owner did not really own her but took her in because of her poverty and the potential marriage to his sons. Also note that countries like America have not really eliminated slavery but rather have eliminated the poverty which causes slavery.

        9. RASHI METHOD: NonVerse
        BRIEF EXPLANATION: The common denominator of the 3 submethods of the NonVerse method is that inferences are made from non textual material. The 3 submethods are as follows:
        • Spreadsheet: Rashi makes inferences of a numerical nature that can be summarized in a traditional spreadsheet
        • Geometric: Rashi clarifies a Biblical text using descriptions of geometric diagrams
        • Fill-ins: Rashi supplies either real-world background material or indicates real-world inferences from a verse. The emphasis here is on the real-world, non-textual nature of the material.
        This examples applies to Rashis Ex24-04b Ex19-01a Ex19-03a Ex19-08a Ex19-09c Ex19-11b Ex19-15a
        URL Reference: (c) http://www.Rashiyomi.com/rule1206.htm
        Brief Summary: a) Jews arrive at Sinai on 1st of Month b) Moses receives instruction on 2nd; c) transmits message on 3rd; d) transmits reply on 4th; e)waits 3 days. Torah given on 6th or 7th.

    We all know that Shavuoth happens on the 6th of Sivan and that the Torah was either received on Shavuoth itself or on the 7th of Sivan. (Rav Hirsch explains that if the Torah was received on Shavuoth then Shavuoth celebrates the receipt of the Torah. However if the Torah was received on the 7th of Sivan then Shavuoth celebrates our preparation and being ready for receipt of the Torah - that is, the preparation to receive the Torah would be considered the primary thing to celebrate).

    The Table below presents the verses that support the calculation that the Torah was received on the 6th or 7th of Sivan.

    Justifying Verse Event Date of Occurrence Rational
    Ex19-01a Jews arrive at Sinai 1st Day of Sivan Verse explicitly says: On 1st of 3rd month they arrived at Sinai.
    Ex19-03a Moses receives prophetic orders 2nd Day of Sivan Reasonable assumption that each event was done on a new day giving time to prepare responses.
    Ex19-08a Moses relates prophetic orders of day 2 to nation 3rd day of Sivan Reasonable assumption that each event was done on a new day giving time to prepare responses.
    Ex19-09c Moses relates response of nation to orders of God 4th day of Sivan Reasonable assumption that each event was done on a new day giving time to prepare responses.
    Ex19-11b God, after receiving nation's affirmative response, asks for 3 days of separation Days 4,5,6 of Sivan The 3 days began on the 4th and hence were concluded on 6th.
    Ex24-04b Nation offers sacrifices in preparation for receipt of Torah; prophetic visions happen Day 5 of Sivan The response of the nation - We will do [the convenant] is explicitly mentioned at both Ex19-08 and Ex24-03. As pointed out two rows ago, this happened on the 4th. The next verse Ex24-04 states Moses got up in the morning and built an altar. We consequently infer that the sacrifices happened on the 5th.
    Ex19-15b Nation receives Torah (Prophetic revelation of decalogue) Day 6 or 7 of Sivan We know there were 3 days of preparation ordered by God. Moses commanded a triplet of days of preparation. Hence either the Torah was received on the 3rd of these 3 days (day 6) or after them (day 7). We can read the text either way.

    Advanced Rashi: Rashi points out that Ex24, the sacrifices prior to the receipt of the Torah happened on the 5th of Sivan while the Decalogue itself is stated in a prior chapter Ex20. Rashi concludes that Textual Biblical sequence does not necessarily indicate temporal sequence. It is important to supplement this Rashi comment with the grammatical observation that in Biblical Hebrew, the past, as indicated by a future conjugation preceded by a vav, indicates the simple past, while the past, as indicated by the past conjugation, indicates the past perfect (Which in English is indicated with the participle had.) Hence Ex24-01, stated in a chapter that occurs after the chapter with the description of the revealed law, states, And God had told Moses to come up for revelation... The use of the past perfect, had told gives grammatical support to the temporal precedence of Ex24 to the revelation mentioned in Ex20, Ex21, Ex22, Ex23. This simple but convincing grammatical proof for the dictum Textual Biblical sequence does not indicate temporal sequence seems to be an innovation of mine not mentioned by other Biblical commentators.

        10. RASHI METHOD: SYMBOLISM
        BRIEF EXPLANATION: Rashi provides symbolic interpretations of words, verses, and chapters. Rashi can symbolically interpret either
        • (10a) entire Biblical chapters such as the gifts of the princes, Nu-07
        • (10b) individual items, verses and words
        The rules governing symbolism and symbolic interpretation are presented in detail on my website.

        This examples applies to Rashis Ex24-10b
        URL Reference: (c) http://www.Rashiyomi.com/w33n9.htm
        Brief Summary: The vision of God had a WORK of SAPHHIRE BRICK at God's feet. God's redemption RESTED (Feet) on the STORY (SAPPHIRE=SIPUR=Story) of the MIRACULOUS WORKS [redemption] from the BRICK labor in Egypt.

      Verse Ex24-09:10b discussing the revelation at Sinai states Then went up Moses, and Aaron, Nadab, and Abihu, and seventy of the elders of Israel; And they visioned the God of Israel; and there was
      • under his feet [Rashi: God supported his trek from Exodus to Revelation]
      • a kind of paved work [Rashi: God's work - his miracles.]
      • of a sapphire [Rashi: The word Sapphire, comes from the Hebrew root, Samech-Pay-Resh which means to tell a story - in fact, the Sapphire is simply a precious gem that everyone tells stories about because of its great beauty.]
      • bricks, [Rashi: The story of the brick-labor in Egypt.]
      Rashi explains the Symbolism as indicated in the bracketed comments in the above verse.Rashi explains that the work of Sapphire brick at God's feet, refers to God treking from Egypt to Revelation on the story of the miraculous works by which he saved the Jews from the brick-labor in Egypt.

    Advanced Rashi: I have added to Rashi's literal statements additional explanations of works as symbolizing miracles, feet as symbolizing God's trek through history, and the sapphire, the story gem as symbolizing the stories of the exodus. Such supplementing of Rashi symbolic comments is justified since the text uses 4 keywords - feet, sapphire, work, brick - but Rashi only explains one of them, brick. Hence the teacher is obligated to complement Rashi by explaining the others.

    Conclusion

    This week's issue contains no examples of the database Rashi method. Visit the RashiYomi website at http://www.Rashiyomi.com for further details and examples.