Their presence in Rashis on Parshath BaMiDBaR Volume 18, Number 10 This weeks Weekly Rashi with Hebrew/English source tables will be accessible, on Sunday, at http://www.Rashiyomi.com/rule1810.htm (c) RashiYomi Incorporated, Dr. Hendel, President, May 24 2012 Visit the Rashi website http://www.Rashiyomi.com The goal of this Weekly Rashi Digest is to use the weekly Torah portion to expose students at all levels to the ten major methods of commentary used by Rashi. It is hoped that continual weekly exposure to these ten major methods will enable students of all levels to acquire a familiarity and facility with the major exegetical methods. Although I frequently use my own English translations of biblical verses and Rashi comments, the Hebrew and English translations in the source tables are derived from online parshah files at chabad.org who in turn acknowledges the Judaica Press Complete Tanach, copyright by Judaica Press
Verse Nu01-51c discussing that non-priests/levites inappropriately coming near Temple will die states And when the tabernacle is to set forward, the Levites shall take it down; and when the tabernacle is to be pitched, the Levites shall set it up; and the stranger who comes near shall be put to death Rashi clarifies the underlined words death by referencing verse(s) Nu16-35, Nu18-03 which states And there came out a fire from the Lord, and consumed the two hundred and fifty men who offered incense...And they shall keep your charge, and the charge of all the Tent; only they shall not come near the utensils of the sanctuary and the altar, that neither they, nor you also, die. Hence the Rashi comment: As the underlined words show, the statement in Nu01-51c that the stranger who comes near shall be put to death cross references the death penalty mentioned in Nu18-03 for improper coming near which is consistent with the death at the hands of God that befell the followers of Korach who improperly came near to God.
Todays Rashi rule combines the grammar and meaning method. Consequently we repeat this explanation in both rule 2,meaning and rule 3, grammar.
We can apply the above Rashi rule to verse Nu04-13 which states And they shall ash the altar, and spread a purple cloth on it; Here we have embedded the Rashi comment in the translation of the verse. The Rashi comment focues on transforming the noun ash into the verb to ash which means to remove ash. Notice how this transformation - the noun ash transforms to the verb to ash - is consistent with a similar transformation in English, to dust from dust. Consequently, this Rashi rule combines the grammar (transforming a noun into a verb) and meaning (the meaning of a coined term) methods.
Todays Rashi rule combines the grammar and meaning method. Consequently we repeat this explanation in both rule 2,meaning and rule 3, grammar.
We can apply the above Rashi rule to verse Nu04-13 which states And they shall ash the altar, and spread a purple cloth on it; Here we have embedded the Rashi comment in the translation of the verse. The Rashi comment focues on transforming the noun ash into the verb to ash which means to remove ash. Notice how this transformation - the noun ash transforms to the verb to ash - is consistent with a similar transformation in English, to dust from dust. Consequently, this Rashi rule combines the grammar (transforming a noun into a verb) and meaning (the meaning of a coined term) methods.
The table below presents an aligned extract of verses or verselets in Nu01-03a Both verses/verselets discuss who will be conted in the census. The alignment justifies the Rashi comment that: Military conscription starts at age 20.
Advanced Rashi: Traditional Rashi-ists would explain this contradiction by incorrectly appealing to word nuances or to alignment. For example aligning the two verses listed above we see a hinted contrast of come to be posted vs. to do work in the temple. This contrast of nuances hints at a distinction of actual work vs training to be posted. We however have explained this Rashi using the contradiction method. What is important is the fact of contradiction. True there might be supportive nuances emanating from alignment but the fact of contradiction justifies a resolution. We try the three methods of resolution - 2 stages, 2 aspects, broad-literal meaning - and find that the 2 stages approach neatly suggests training-performance. This approach of seeking a natural resolution by appeal to real-world phenomena is characteristic of the contradiction method. In fact the contradiction method, although sometimes it uses verses, very often relies on intuitive logic to naturally resolve a textual contradiction by appeal to real world phenomena such as the training-performance sequence.
Certain Biblical paragraphs are stated in a Theme-Development-Theme form. In other words a broad general idea is stated first followed by the development of this broad general theme in specific details. The paragraph-like unit is then closed with a repetition of the broad theme. The Theme-Detail-Theme form creates a unified paragraph. The detailed section of this paragraph is therefore seen as an extension of the general theme sentences. Today's example illustrates this as shown immediately below.
Rashi generalizes the detail clause Ark, table, lampstand, golden altar,instruments of ministry.... as illustrative of the general clause, Aaron's sons shall come and cover the sanctuary and states: All utensils used in the Holies are included even if not explicitly enumerated, for example, the utensils for offering incense on the Golden altar. We believe this comment evident and consistent with the Rabbi Ishmael style guidelines.
We have explained in our article Biblical Formatting located on the world wide web at http://www.Rashiyomi.com/biblicalformatting.pdf, that the Biblical Author indicated bullets by using repeating keywords. That is, if a modern author wanted to get a point across using bullets - a list of similar but contrastive items - then the Biblical Author would use repeating keywords. Today's verse illustrates this principle. Bullets whether indicated through modern notation or through the Biblical method of repeating keywords always indicate contrastive emphasis - that is, each bullet is presumed to be a distinct item contrasted to the other items on the list. Very often the bullets are also used to indicate that the entire list of exhaustive of some spectrum.
A perhaps more important question is why? Why are some objects called holy while other objects are called holy utensils? I would suggest that the main goals of Judaism, Torah knowledge and the respect for prophecy symbolized respectively by the Ark and the Altar-fires symbolizing prophetic fire visions, are the main Holy objects. By contrast, the Table and Candellabrah, symbolizing learning and dependence on God for food are means to the end of Torah knowledge and prophecy; hence, they are classified as utensils to the holys. The verse by bulleting separately the Holies and the Utensils of the Holies indicated two stages of Temple utensils.
Today, we ask the following database query: How often are censii taken? The reader is encouraged to perform the query using a standard Biblical Konnkordance or search engine. This database query yields the list below. The list justifies the following Rashi inference: God continually counted the Jews with either a complete census or a census of those fallen during a plague. Such obsessive counting typically indicates great attachment and fondness. We conlude God had great love for the Jewish people. The list below presents the results of the database query and shows examples
Background: Originally the firstborn served at the sacrifices. When the Jews sinned by the Golden calf God took this privilege away from them and gave it to the Levites. The process of transfer of responsibility from the firstborn to the Levites was called a redemption process. The redemption process is described in the table below. Because this aspect of the Bible involves computations and spreadsheets we classify this Rashi as non-verse/spreadsheets.
There was the further problem of who to collect the $1,365 from. After all each particular firstborn could claim he corresponded to an actual Levite and didn't have to pay. Therefore the redemption was done by lottery which picked 273 firstborn each of whom paid $5 shekel.
Advanced Rashi: Rashi also mentions the 20 silver price by which Joseph was sold. We will discuss this aspect of Rashi in a later year. This week's parshah contains no examples of the symbolism Rashi method. Visit the RashiYomi website at http://www.Rashiyomi.com and http://www.Rashiyomi.com/rule.htm for further details and examples. |