#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*# (C) Dr Hendel, 2000 *#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*
-----------------------------------------------------------
| Rashi is Simple Version 2.0 |
| (C) Dr Hendel, Summer 2000 |
| http://www.RashiYomi.Com |
| PERMISSION to reprint WITH this header if NOT for profit |
------------------------------------------------------------
VERSE: Dt21-22b
RASHIS COVERED: Dt21-17b Dt21-22b Lv07-26a Dt18-03b
RULE:
----
a) If the Torah gives only an EXAMPLE then
the example should be generalized
eg Dt25-04 "Dont muzzle an OX" implies
"Dont muzzle ANY ANIMAL
b) But If the Torah gives a GENERAL CLASS & EXAMPLE then
the example should NOT be generalized
eg Lv01-02 "Offer sacrifices from ANIMALS-from OXEN"
implies that ONLY oxen can be brought for sacrifices
EXAMPLES
--------
1) Dt21-22b
A person who is EXECUTED is hung (GENERAL STATEMENT)
...
since he has DESPISED God (DETAILED STATEMENT)
So only those criminals liable to a death penalty who
have also DESPISED God are hung (ie the idolater and
the blasphemer)
(NOTE: There are 36 people who are executed for their
sins. Of these 36 people,2--the idolater and the
blasphemer--are also HUNG after their execution.
The above verse is used to teach which of the 36
executed people are hung)*2
2) Dt21-17b
He shall give his 1st born, double inheritance (GENERAL)
among the things found by him (DETAILS)
So eg the 1st born (of say 2 children) gets 66% of
the fathers estate but only 50% of the fathers bonds
(Because bonds aren't ASSETS that 'are found by him')
3) Lv07-26a
Do not eat BLOOD (GENERAL)
From BIRDS or ANIMALS (DETAILS)
So only BIRDS and ANIMAL-BLOOD is prohibited.
But the blood of FISH and GRASSHOPPERS is permitted
4) Dt18-03b
These are the laws for those who offer SACRIFICES (GENERAL)
..whether OXEN or SHEEP (DETAILS)
So the above laws ONLY apply to OXEN and SHEEP
not to BEASTS or BIRDS
NOTES
-----
*1 There are several RabbiIshmael rules that require
generalization---for example DETAILS-SPECIES or
SPECIES-DETAIL-SPECIES or just EXAMPLE by itself.
Each of these requires generalization but of a
different degree. It would take us too far afield
to give details now so we are simply noting it.
*2 This is a peach of an example for those who want
to learn Rabbi Ishmael Rules as well as those like
Dr Loike who want proof that Rashi doesn't always say
what he means
2a The Talmud Sanhedrin 45 uses this verse to discuss the
RabbiIshmael rule of GENERAL-DETAIL. To be brief the
Talmud points out 2 items
---In applying the GENERAL-DETAIL rule we must distinguish
if the GENERAL-DETAILS are right next to each other as in
Lv01-02 "Offer ANIMALS-Offer OXEN" or if they are separated
by phrases as in this verse "An executed person is hung...
bury him on that day...he has despised God" Thus the
GENERAL STATEMENT (executed) and DETAILED STATEMENT
(despised God) are separated
---Although there is agreement that the example should be
made specific and not generalized there is controversy on
HOW SPECIFIC it should be made
---We could say ONLY executed people EXACTLY LIKE those
who despise God (blasphemer)--this would include the idolater
---We could say ONLY executed people LIKE those that despise
God (this would include all stoned people)
However we do not FULLY GENERALIZE the example
---We do not say EVERY PERSON EXECUTED is hung
The reader may be rightly confused
"First you say that GENERAL-DETAIL is not generalized and then
you quote several opinions that maybe it is generalized. Which
is it?"
But that is the nature of Talmudic controversy. My job here
is to show you what Rashi is doing. Rashi is, despite the
confusion, simple--he is dealing with the EXAMPLE ("for he
despised God"). How far to go with dealing with this EXAMPLE
is complicated and the subject of Talmudic controversy.
2b We now answer John Loikes question--How can I give strong
proof that Rashi does not mean what he says"
SIMPLE! The law is that ONLY the blasphemer and idolater
are hung. But Rashi does not say that! He cites the opinion
that all executed people are hung! (This law is reached
thru the "laws of decision" which indicate in controversies
whose opinion we follow--so Rashi could NOT have believed
what is wrote).
However This law ("all are executed") is in fact the
beginning of the Talmud in Sanhedrin. I have no choice but
to assume that RASHI WAS CITING THE BEGINNING OF THE
TALMUD WITH THE EXPECTATION THAT THE TEACHER WOULD EXPLAIN
ALL DETAILS.
Here are some other examples where Rashi cites the BEGINNING
with the EXPECTATION that the whole will be cited
EXAMPLE 2: We cite the VERSE, SIFRAH and RASHI
VERSE: Lv06-32b "....this law applies to ALL SIN OFFERINGS"
SIFRAH: Rabbi Akivah says "ALL" extends the law to ALL
offerings. To this his colleagues demur "How can ALL SIN
OFFERINGS" mean ALL OFFERINGS (We never find ALL extending
a law outside its class). Rather ALL SIN OFFERINGS includes
the GUILT OFFERINGS (Which are just like the SIN OFFERINGS)
This last opinion is the accepted law.
RASHI: "ALL" extends the law to all OFFERINGS
Notice how Rashi cited something that is not accepted as
law and also is illogical (How can ALL SIN OFFERINGS mean
ALL OFFERINGS).
Again I conclude that Rashi intended that this be continued
by the teacher
EXAMPLE 3: On Ex32-13a Rashi gives 2 reasons why the
"merit of the patriarchs" is mentioned in prayer.
But as I showed in the longer Digest posting these 2
reasons are the opening paragraphs of a whole chapter
in Exodus Rabbah (I believe 44). As I also showed there
the first paragraph is quite illogical but nevertheless
Rashi cited it instead of the more logical continuations
Obviously Rashi EXPECTED the teacher to cite the whole
chapter.
RULES USED: RabbiIshmael
---------------------------------------------------
WARNING: The following additional references may be too wordy
However they frequently contain additional information & lists
The hyperlinks only work on the main website
Volume 7 Number 13
#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*# (C) Dr Hendel, 2000 *#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*
Volume 7 Number 13