#*#*#*#*# (C) 2001, RashiYomi Inc. Dr Hendel President #*#*#*#*#
-----------------------------------------------------------
| Rashi is Simple Version 2.0 |
| (C) RashiYomi Inc., Dr Hendel President |
| http://www.RashiYomi.Com |
| PERMISSION to reprint WITH this header if NOT for profit |
------------------------------------------------------------
VERSE: Dt33-27d
=============== MeOnAh means Home =============
Dt33-27d MeOn:MeONaH::Dwelling::Home
VERY BRIEF SUMMARY
------------------
In Hebrew you can place a HEY as a suffix
to any word. The new word with the HEY then
indicates either
(a) ALOT OF eg. N-G-F=Attack; M-G-F-H=plague
(b) EXTENSIONS: eg Tz-D-K=justice;TzDKH=Charity
(c) PERMANANCE:eg MeON=Dwelling;MeONah=Home
The list below displays examples of this
principle. A standard simple example is the
feminine grammatical form: Thus MLCh=King while
MLChH=The QUEEN whose power extends the Kings.
----------------------------------------
TODAYS RASHI RULE: GRAMMAR
TODAYS RASHI SUBRULE: GENDER
----------------------------------------
STANDARD REFERENCES FOR THIS RULE
---------------------------------
The 6 Rashi rule classes
http://www.RashiYomi.com/rules-01.htm
The RashiYomi grammar page
http://www.Rashiyomi.com/grammar.htm
TODAYS LIST
-----------
Examples of the SUFFIX-FEMININE HEY are
presented. Note that our explanation deviates
from the Rashi text that we have
===============================================
ROOT MEANING MEANING WITH HEY
========== ================ ===================
N-G-F Attack Plague*1
Y-A-D To Meet Congregation*2
R-C-V To Ride Chariot*3
---------- ---------------- -------------------
A-D-M Man Cultivated Land*4
Tz-D-K Justice Charity*5
M-L-Ch King Queen*6
---------- ---------------- -------------------
N-T-N To Give The Gift*7
P-L-L To Bless The Blessing*8
Me-On Dwelling/Cave Home/Lair*9
NOTES
-----
*1 ATTACK could denote just ONE attack, while
a PLAGUE denotes ALOT OF ATTACKS
*2 To MEET could denote one meeting while CONGREGATION
indicates ALOT OF MEETINGS at one time
*3 TO RIDE could denote one ride on a horse;
A CHARIOT describes a utensil designed for
ALOT OF RIDING
*4 The word E-R-Tz denotes LAND. By contrast
A-D-M-H denotes HUMAN LAND--that is
CULTIVATED LAND. Thus ADAMAH indicates
the EFFECTS and EXTENSION of man.
*5 Tz-D-K indicates JUSTICE. CHARITY can
be perceived as an EXTENSION of Justice
Giving someone something they deserve
but cant legally claim
*6 The QUEENs power is an EXTENSION
of the Kings power
*7 Any object can be given; But a GIFT
is a something specially wrapped--
something the recipient will always
perceive as being given--it is more
PERMANANT.
*8 You can wish anyone well; but a BLESSING
--like MAY GOD PLACE YOU LIKE EPHRAIM &
MENASHEH--is a more PERMANANT FIXED
structure
*9 The Me-On denotes either a LION-CAVE
or a DWELLING. The Me-O-Nah is a
more permanant form of this--it could
indicate the more PERMANANT LAIR of the
LION or it could indicate not just a
dwelling but a PERMANANT home
--------------- LONGER FOOTNOTES -------------
*10 Our actual Rashi text reads as follows
-------------------------------------
A suffix HEY can be used to indicate
the preposition TO. Thus MITZRAYIM
means EGYPT while MITZRAYMAH means
TO EGYPT
-------------------------------------
This question was raised to be by
a fellow actuary and baal koray in
Baltimore (Who wishes to remain
anonymous).
One obvious objection to the Rashi is
that it is inconsistent with the
meaning of the text.
But a more serious objection to Rashi
is that in every instance where the
above Rashi rule is used the
word is pronounced with accent on
the next to last syllable while in
Dt33-27d the accent is on the last
syllable.
I believe this argument of accent
conclusively proves that Rashi could
not have possibly held this opinion
since Rashi is one of the few
commentators that distinguishes meaning
based on accent.
The correct interpretation of Rashi
is therefore based on an the SUFFIX
HEY rule we enunciated above.
Some people have taken me to task
for not FIRST checking out Rashi
manuscripts. Well that certainly
is a welcome and proper procedure
But my point is that the LISTS
showing on the one hand the absurdity
of the present Rashi text and on the
other hand the cogency of the proposed
Rashi text have intrinsic validty in
and of themselves. The interesting
question of whether we should require
an additional check against manuscripts
is a separate issue (Which we do not
go into here on this list)
========================================================
RASHI RULE USED: GRAMMAR
---------------------------------------------------
WARNING: The following additional references may be too wordy
However they frequently contain additional information & lists
The hyperlinks only work on the main website
Volume 15 Number 11
#*#*#*#*# (C) 2001, RashiYomi Inc. Dr Hendel President #*#*#*#*#
Volume 15 Number 11