#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*# (C) Dr Hendel, 2000 *#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*
  -----------------------------------------------------------
  |      Rashi is Simple Version 2.0                         |
  |      (C) Dr Hendel, Summer 2000                          |
  |       http://www.RashiYomi.Com                           |
  | PERMISSION to reprint WITH this header if NOT for profit |
  ------------------------------------------------------------


VERSE: Ex22-04d

RASHIS COVERED: Ex22-04d Ex21-34b

One of the contributions of this list is to use the well known
method of double parshas. Here are 3 verses dealing with
payment requirements of people who damage

Comparison of 3 verses requiring payment for damages
---------------------------------------------------------------
Ex21-34 The owner of a PIT must pay: MONEY     will be returned
Ex22-04 Owners of DAMAGING ANIMALS:  BEST LAND will be payed
Ex22-05 Owners of FIRE:                        will    pay pay
                                     *3                *2  *1
---------------------------------------------------------------

NOTES
=====
*1 The repeated word PAY PAY follows the rules of REPEATED words
   which we have discussed in http://www.RashiYomi.COm/dn.htm
   In general a repetition denotes that something happens no
   matter what. In this case it means that payment will happen
   no matter what. This means if a person does not have MONEY
   or GOOD REAL ESTATE then he pays from inferior real estate

*2 Two verses say >PAY< while one verse says >RETURN< implying
   that it is permissable to either >PAY MONEY< or >RETURN
   VALUABLES< (eg jewelry) of comparable value to the damaged
   object.

*3 The use of the terms >MONEY< and >BEST LAND< implies that
   the damager should pay money OR, if he doesn't have money,
   he should pay from the best of his real estate (In other
   words if he owes a $1000 for the damage he must sell
   $1000 of real estate from a good neighborhood and may not
   initially pay $1000 of real estate from a bad neighborhood


As mentioned, although the method of DOUBLE PARSHAS is known
and the method of ALIGNING these Parshas is known (to see
the differences) nevertheless we have emphasized

--explaining and reviewing ALL differences in a compared aligned
  list even if Rashi did not explain them. We call this the
  workbook method since Rashi the teacher explains some
  differences and we the students must complete the rest.

  In this example there is no Rashi on >PAY PAY< though it
  obviously corresponds to the law I have cited

--we have emphasized identifying where Rashi learns from
  grammar and where he learns from compared words. Thus
  the Rashi that says that the word >RETURNED< implies that
  the damager can pay valuables (instead of money) is not
  learned because of the nuances of the word >RETURNED< but
  rather is learned by comparing and aligning the verses


RASHI RULE USED: DOUBLE PARSHAS
---------------------------------------------------
WARNING: The following additional references may be too wordy
However they frequently contain additional information & lists
The hyperlinks only work on the main website

Volume 8 Number 11


#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*# (C) Dr Hendel, 2000 *#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*