#*#*#*#*#  (C) 2001, RashiYomi Inc. Dr Hendel President #*#*#*#*#
  -----------------------------------------------------------
  |      Rashi is Simple Version 2.0                         |
  |      (C) RashiYomi Inc., Dr Hendel President             |
  |       http://www.RashiYomi.Com                           |
  | PERMISSION to reprint WITH this header if NOT for profit |
  ------------------------------------------------------------


VERSE: Nu04-47a

RASHIS COVERED: Nu04-47a Nu04-47b

====================== LEVITES SING/BEAR =======================

VERY BRIEF SUMMARY
------------------
The Bible describes the task of the levites using various words
such as CRAFTSMANSHIP, SERVICE, BEARING. An alignment of about
a dozen verses where these terms occur shows special emphasis
on two types of tasks: SERVICE/BEARING. By referring to other
Biblical verses we see that the Levites performed two primary
tasks-- SINGING ACCOMPANIMENT TO SACRIFICES and TRANSPORT-
BEARING OF THE TEMPLE on trips.Logically, it seems satisfactory
to connect BEARING=TRANSPORT; SERVICE=SINGING. The emphasis in
our approach is not on etymologies but rather on seeking other
verses supporting nuances.

----------------------------------------
TODAYS RASHI RULE:       ALIGNMENT
TODAYS RASHI SUBRULE:    FURTHER NUANCES
----------------------------------------

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF RULE
-------------------------
Many Rashis do NOT focus on an internal analysis of the verse.
There may be nothing bothering Rashi in THAT verse. The words
used may all be normal.

But when the given verse is compared with another verse--that
is, when the two verses are ALIGNED together-- we see blatant
differences.

The ALIGNED verses therefore suggest that these ALIGNED
DIFFERENCES were deliberately placed there to emphasize
certain nuances. The standard example will illustrtae this.


STANDARD EXAMPLE
----------------
Recall that the Moabite King BALAK was apprehensive about
Israel journeying throught its territory. It wanted Israel
banished. It hired a professional curse-man, Bilam who would
curse the Jews. Bilam however describes his job SLIGHTLY
differently. Here are the verses.

 -----------------------------------------------
 BALAK: Nu22-06 I will banish Jews FROM THE LAND
 BILAM: Nu22-11 ...... banish Jews -------------
 -----------------------------------------------


EXERCISE
--------
To fully appreciate Rashi perform the following 2 exercises
- What is the minor difference between the aligned verses?
- What NUANCE do YOU think this implies?


RASHIS SOLUTION
---------------
BALAK only wanted Jews away from his land; his goals were
political. By contrast, BILAM wanted them DESTROYED. Hence...

BALAK wanted Jews BANISHED FROM THE LAND. But Bilam wanted
them BANISHED PERIOD (That is destroyed).


STANDARD REFERENCES FOR THIS RULE
---------------------------------
http://www.Rashiyomi.com/align-58.htm

This summary may be a bit too terse. You can browse the
57 postings leading up to by going to
http://www.Rashiyomi.com/align-1.htm
http://www.Rashiyomi.com/align-2.htm etc.

Or you can visit the Rashi Yomi Calendar at

http://www.RashiYomi.com/calendar1.htm

This calendar presents a day by day listing of Rashis.
The ALIGNMENT series occurs between 7-28-01 and 10-10-01.


HOW TO USE THESE LISTS FOR SCHOOL PROJECTS
------------------------------------------
You can use the LISTS referenced above for
school projects. Here is how. If you are a
teacher then you can present the two aligned
verses and ask the students to perform the
following exercises

-- What are the minor differences between the verses
-- What nuances do they imply

The students can then compare their analysis with that
of Rashis. This leads to greater appreciation of Rashi.

TODAYS EXAMPLE
--------------
Here is the list of verses of Levite service. Further
support is found in the footnotes. Other approaches to
Rashi are mentioned in the longer footnotes.
================================================================
VERSE   INITIAL LANGUAGE USED           SECOND LANGUAGE USED
======= =============================== ========================
Nu04-03 Those who do CRAFTSMANSHIP*1
Nu04-23 Those who SERVE SERVICE*1
Nu04-24        to SERVE*1               TO BEAR*1 *2
Nu04-30        to SERVE SERVICE
Nu04-35       for       SERVICE
Nu04-39       for       SERVICE
Nu04-47       to serve SERVICE-SERVICE  and BEARING-SERVICE
Nu04-49 Every person in SERVICE*3       in BEARING

NOTES
-----
*1 Note the rich use of language. At least 4 terms are used
   CRAFTSMANSHIP, SERVICE, SERVE-SERVICE, BEARING-SERVICE.
   Yet as the above list shows there seems to be an emphasis
   of TWO TYPES: SERVICE and BEARING. Thus the emphasis in
   understanding Rashi should NOT be on attaching nuances to
   every word--rather the emphasis should be on attaching
   nuances to database justified nuances*10

*2 To BEAR means to CARRY. In fact eg Nu04 clearly mentions
   that the Levites task was to carry the disassembled
   ark during transport (See Nu04-01:16 or Nu04-21:28).

*3 There are similarly many Biblical chapters mentioning
   the service of the levites by Song. eg 1Ch06. See
   especially 1Ch06-17 which calls the LEVITE SINGING, SERVICE
   We use here the Rashi technique of OTHER VERSES

---------------------- LONGER FOOTNOTES ------------------------

*10 Rashis literal language is
    -------------------------------------------------
    SERVICE-SERVICE has a nuance of a SERVICE for
    ANOTHER service--this then would refer to Levite
    singing
    -------------------------------------------------

    Thus it incorrectly appears that Rashi is DERIVING
    the meaning of SERVICE-SERVICE from the above
    etymology.

    But the correct approach is that
    - Rashi derived the meaning from USAGE in other verses
    - Rashi THEN (after the fact) justified the etymology

    Still another way of looking at this is that Rashi
    EXPECTED the student to read Rashi AFTER they
    had constructed the above list.

    Indeed, if Rashi WANTED us to extract nuances from
    every word then why didnt he ALSO explain the
    strange word CRAFTSMANSHIP which occurs in Nu04-03.

    My opinion however is that because this word
    only occurs once and does not have DATABASE
    JUSTIFICATION therefore Rashi did not explain it.
=================================================================

RASHI RULE USED: ALIGNMENT
---------------------------------------------------
WARNING: The following additional references may be too wordy
However they frequently contain additional information & lists
The hyperlinks only work on the main website

Volume 14 Number 3


#*#*#*#*#  (C) 2001, RashiYomi Inc. Dr Hendel President #*#*#*#*#
Volume 14 Number 3