Rashi-Is-Simple Mailing List
VISIT the RASHI DATABASE archives AT
http://www.RashiYomi.com/
Surfing the Talmudic Seas
(C) RashiYomi Incorporated, 2002
Written by Dr Russell Jay Hendel
Volume 14 Number 3
For the WORD QUALITY HTML VERSION click here
-----------------------------------
http://www.Rashiyomi.com/h14n3.htm
Produced May 22nd, 2002
WARNING: USE FIX WIDTH FONTS (eg COURIER (NEW) 10)
OVERVIEW OF HILIGHTS IN THIS ISSUE |
` Whats new and hot in this issue? |
ITEM | WHATS NEW & HOT IN THIS ISSUE |
WORKBOOK | We are embarking on a Rashi Workbook Project*1 |
WHY | Why didnt the Bible simply state it simply?*2 |
The REAL RSHI | When Rashi gives a reason is that the Real one?*3 |
| |
COMMENTS |
*1 Over the next year or so we will be writing modules for
the 2-4 dozen basic Rashi skill competencies needed for
learning Rashi. These modules will then be gathered into
a workbook which can be used at home or in schools In
the meantime each of these modules is usable in actual
schools or home-schooling situations.
*2 Frequently Rashi will explain on Biblical phrase as meaning
something else. The question arises: WHY DIDNT THE BIBLE
SIMPLY SAY SO. We provide an answer
*3 Frequently (on this list) Rashi says one thing but we
claim the real reason is something else. How then should
we understand the Rashi. Read below for the answer.
|
Rashis covered in this issue |
|
VERSE | RULE | BRIEF DESCRIPTION |
======== | =============== | ======================================= |
Ex20-02a | DOUBLE PARSHAS | A dozen commandments mention the Exodus |
Dt05-15a | DOUBLE PARSHAS | A dozen commandments mention the Exodus |
Dt16-12a | DOUBLE PARSHAS | A dozen commandments mention the Exodus |
Dt24-18a | DOUBLE PARSHAS | A dozen commandments mention the Exodus |
Lv22-33a | DOUBLE PARSHAS | A dozen commandments mention the Exodus |
Lv11-45a | DOUBLE PARSHAS | A dozen commandments mention the Exodus |
Nu15-41c | DOUBLE PARSHAS | A dozen commandments mention the Exodus |
Ex20-02a | DOUBLE PARSHAS | A dozen commandments mention the Exodus |
Ex29-46a | DOUBLE PARSHAS | A dozen commandments mention the Exodus |
Lv25-38a | DOUBLE PARSHAS | A dozen commandments mention the Exodus |
Lv19-36d | DOUBLE PARSHAS | A dozen commandments mention the Exodus |
Nu04-47a | ALIGNMENT | Levites (a) SANG (b) TRANSPORTED Temple |
Nu04-47b | ALIGNMENT | Levites (a) SANG (b) TRANSPORTED Temple |
Nu05-08a | GRAMMAR | Rashi FILLS-IN pronouns |
Nu05-08b | GRAMMAR | Rashi FILLS-IN pronouns |
--------- | ---------------- | --------------------------------------- |
#*#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc., 2002, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#*#*#
VERSE: Ex20-02a
RASHIS COVERED: Ex20-02a Dt05-15a Dt16-12a Dt24-18a Lv22-33a
Lv11-45a Nu15-41c Ex20-02a Ex29-46a
Lv25-38a Lv19-36d
DATABASE METHODS |
VERY BRIEF SUMMARY
------------------
There are only a dozen commandments where it mentions
the EXODUS from Egypt--that is, it states DO THESE
COMMANDMENTS AND REMEMBER THAT I, GOD, TOOK YOU OUT
OF EGYPT. There are 4 reasons for mentioning the Exodus:
(1) BE NICE TO SLAVES AND ORPHANS (cf Dt15-15,Dt05-15
Dt16-12, Dt24-18); (2) SANCTIFY YOURSELVES by avoiding ritual
impurity; (cf Lv22-33, Lv11-45, Nu15-41, Ex29-46).(3) AVOID
ANXIETY PRODUCING BUSINESS PRACTICES (Cf Lv25-38, Lv19-36)
(4) SERVE THE TRUE ONE UNIQUE GOD: (cf Ex20-01,Ex29-46)
All these practices were intrinsic to Egypt.
-----------------------------------------
TODAYS RASHI RULE: DATABASE METHODS
TODAYS RASHI SUBRULE: DATABASE METHODS
-----------------------------------------
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF RULE
-------------------------
One of Rashis main goals was to function as a Masorite:
A scholar who preserves the accuracy of the Biblical
text.
A primary vehicle for preserving the Biblical text is
noting RARITY. RARITY simply means that in some domain
of knowledge, Biblical language rarely uses certain
words or terms.
Examples of Biblical rarity are (a) Grammatical conjugations
that do not occur that often in Tnach; (b) Special topics
that occur in only a FEW of the Biblical commandments; (c)
grammatical roots that only occur a few times in the Bible.
I have coined the phrase: TO RASHI A TEXT--which means to
especially note all RARITY that occurs in that text. Rashi
will frequently NOT EXPLAIN this RARITY but simply NOTE IT.
As indicated this is the task of the Masorite.
For those who are familiar with Database theory this can
be succinctly formulated (See footnote *10)
STANDARD EXAMPLE
----------------
There are 613 BIblical commandments. But only a dozen
or so mention the Exodus. Hence the EXODUS is a Biblical
Rarity relative to the commandments. The list below shows
the dozen or so verses containing Biblical commandments.
In most of them Rashi comments on the emphasis that
----------------------------------------
God took us out of Egypt (Exodus) on
condition that we perform these commandments
----------------------------------------
STUDENT EXERCISES:
------------------
- Gather/find all Biblical commandments that mention
the Exodus
- How many such commandments do you have?
- Are there common themes to these Biblical commandments
RASHIS SOLUTION
---------------
Rashi did NOT have a solution! Rashi simply notes
the Rarity. In each of the dozen or so commandments
mentioning Egypt he mentions this Rarity.
Nevertheless by seeking underlying themes in these
commandments we enrich our understanding of Rashi
STANDARD REFERENCES FOR THIS RULE
---------------------------------
http://www.RashiYomi.com/database.htm
A definitive scholarly paper on Database methods with
many examples.
Todays example may be found at
http://www.RashiYomi.com/dt05-15a.htm
One can also find this example at the Rashi calendar
See http://www.RashiYomi.Com/egypt-5.htm
Or visit the Rashi calendar at
http://www.RashiYomi.com/calendar1.htm
The Exodus series was presented in August 2000
HOW TO USE THESE LISTS FOR SCHOOL PROJECTS
------------------------------------------
You can use the LISTS referenced above for
school projects. Here is how. If you are a
teacher then you can present rarity themes
and ask the students to perform the
3 student exercises listed above.
The students can then compare their analysis with that
of Rashis. This leads to greater appreciation of Rashi.
TODAYS EXAMPLE
--------------
We present the dozen or so commandments where
the exodus is mentioned. Footnotes elaborate further |
VERSE | COMMAND | Why this commandment mentions the Exodus |
Dt05-15a | Slavery*1 | Remember how you were a slave in Egypt |
Dt15-15a | Slavery*1 | Give gifts to your slaves(Like God gave you) |
Dt16-12a | Slavery | Remember the orphan widow levite etc |
Dt24-18a | Slavery | Remember the poor and leave food for them |
Lv22-33a | Holiness*2 | Be Holy (avoid the impurity methods of Egypt |
Lv11-45a | Holiness*2 | Be Holy (avoid the impurity methods of Egypt |
Nu15-41c | Holiness | Do all commandments; Separate from impurity |
Ex20-02a | One God*3 | I am the one God despite various appearances |
Ex29-46a | One GOd | Dwell with ME(God); Not with Egypt |
Lv25-38a | Anxiety*4 | Dont take interest on loans |
Lv19-36d | Anxiety | Dont have bad weights |
| | |
COMMENTS |
*1 In other words a standard Egyptian practice was CLASS
DISTINCTIONS. This destroyed initiative and muffled
individuality. Therefore the Bible especially emphasizes
Egypt on commandments showing compassion to slaves, poor
widows and orphans
*2 A classical humiliation technique of Egypt was exposure
to dead animals, eating blood, visiting graves, idolatry
etc. This destroyed the personality. The BIble counteracts
this by emphasizing holiness *11
*3 We could classify this set of commandments with holiness.
The idea here is that Egypt assigned everyone a PLACE
based on THEIR god. In Judaism there is one God and all
are equally accessible to Him
*4 A classic technique of Egypt was use of business anxiety
measures such as loaning on interest or use of bad
weights. This destroyed the desire for excellence.
The overall goal of Egypt was destroying individuality
and creating a machine of people. Towards this end
they needed to humiliate people enough to destroy
their individuality.
LONGER FOOTNOTES |
*10 This is a slightly technical footnote for those who know
SQL the accepted database standard for all
databases
------------------ HENDELS RARITY ALGORITHM -----------------
Let B=Bible= database with fields BIblical words,Verses
Let C=Commandments = Any domain of expertise
We suppose C enumerates Commandments, Verses of occurence
Then B x C, the Left Join of B and C contains the fields
Biblical Words, Verses they occur in, Which commandment it is
We want to measure how frequently certain words occur in
certain verses.
Let W be all words that occur in any Biblical commandment
The SQL statement is: SELECT distinct w FROM b X c;
We can now count the number of commandment verses where
each Biblical word occurs. The SQL statement is
SELECT w, count(verse) FROM w X b X c WHERE w in W;
The last Query produces a list of all words that occur
in Biblical commandments as well as their frequency.
Certain words like DO NOT occur in hundreds of commandments
Certain words like REPRODUCE only occur in one or two
commandments.
Rashi is not interested in these.
But certain words like EGYPT, REWARD etc occur in a dozen
or so commandments. These words and verses are where you
will find Rashis.
In the above algorithm certain extra intermediate steps
may eg produce tighter distinctnesses. We omit details
Similarly certain steps may be combined with subqueries.
Note the extreme elegance of the Hendel algorithm With
only 5 lines of compact code we have succinctly
described several 100 Rashis.
Praise be Him who Chose Them and Their Learning
------------------------------------------------------------
*11 A beautiful comment by the University of Rabbi Ishmael
occurs on this verse which further illustrates the
database method.
Rabbi Ishmaels school points out that among the dozen
rare commandments that mention Egypt all use the term
I AM GOD THAT took YOU OUT OF EGYPT.
Lv11-45a however uses the expression, I AM GOD
WHO elevated YOU FROM EGYPT. Thus there is emphasis
on ELEVATION from impurity to Holiness.
| |
RASHI RULE USED: DOUBLE PARSHAS
#*#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc., 2002, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#*#*#
VERSE: Nu04-47a
RASHIS COVERED: Nu04-47a Nu04-47b
LEVITES SING/BEAR |
VERY BRIEF SUMMARY
------------------
The Bible describes the task of the levites using various words
such as CRAFTSMANSHIP, SERVICE, BEARING. An alignment of about
a dozen verses where these terms occur shows special emphasis
on two types of tasks: SERVICE/BEARING. By referring to other
Biblical verses we see that the Levites performed two primary
tasks-- SINGING ACCOMPANIMENT TO SACRIFICES and TRANSPORT-
BEARING OF THE TEMPLE on trips.Logically, it seems satisfactory
to connect BEARING=TRANSPORT; SERVICE=SINGING. The emphasis in
our approach is not on etymologies but rather on seeking other
verses supporting nuances.
----------------------------------------
TODAYS RASHI RULE: ALIGNMENT
TODAYS RASHI SUBRULE: FURTHER NUANCES
----------------------------------------
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF RULE
-------------------------
Many Rashis do NOT focus on an internal analysis of the verse.
There may be nothing bothering Rashi in THAT verse. The words
used may all be normal.
But when the given verse is compared with another verse--that
is, when the two verses are ALIGNED together-- we see blatant
differences.
The ALIGNED verses therefore suggest that these ALIGNED
DIFFERENCES were deliberately placed there to emphasize
certain nuances. The standard example will illustrtae this.
STANDARD EXAMPLE
----------------
Recall that the Moabite King BALAK was apprehensive about
Israel journeying throught its territory. It wanted Israel
banished. It hired a professional curse-man, Bilam who would
curse the Jews. Bilam however describes his job SLIGHTLY
differently. Here are the verses.
-----------------------------------------------
BALAK: Nu22-06 I will banish Jews FROM THE LAND
BILAM: Nu22-11 ...... banish Jews -------------
-----------------------------------------------
EXERCISE
--------
To fully appreciate Rashi perform the following 2 exercises
- What is the minor difference between the aligned verses?
- What NUANCE do YOU think this implies?
RASHIS SOLUTION
---------------
BALAK only wanted Jews away from his land; his goals were
political. By contrast, BILAM wanted them DESTROYED. Hence...
BALAK wanted Jews BANISHED FROM THE LAND. But Bilam wanted
them BANISHED PERIOD (That is destroyed).
STANDARD REFERENCES FOR THIS RULE
---------------------------------
http://www.Rashiyomi.com/align-58.htm
This summary may be a bit too terse. You can browse the
57 postings leading up to by going to
http://www.Rashiyomi.com/align-1.htm
http://www.Rashiyomi.com/align-2.htm etc.
Or you can visit the Rashi Yomi Calendar at
http://www.RashiYomi.com/calendar1.htm
This calendar presents a day by day listing of Rashis.
The ALIGNMENT series occurs between 7-28-01 and 10-10-01.
HOW TO USE THESE LISTS FOR SCHOOL PROJECTS
------------------------------------------
You can use the LISTS referenced above for
school projects. Here is how. If you are a
teacher then you can present the two aligned
verses and ask the students to perform the
following exercises
-- What are the minor differences between the verses
-- What nuances do they imply
The students can then compare their analysis with that
of Rashis. This leads to greater appreciation of Rashi.
TODAYS EXAMPLE
--------------
Here is the list of verses of Levite service. Further
support is found in the footnotes. Other approaches to
Rashi are mentioned in the longer footnotes. |
VERSE | INITIAL LANGUAGE USED | SECOND LANGUAGE USED |
Nu04-03 | Those who do CRAFTSMANSHIP*1 | |
Nu04-23 | Those who SERVE SERVICE*1 | |
Nu04-24 | to SERVE*1 | TO BEAR*1 *2 |
Nu04-30 | to SERVE SERVICE | |
Nu04-35 | for SERVICE | |
Nu04-39 | for SERVICE | |
Nu04-47 | to serve SERVICE-SERVICE | and BEARING-SERVICE |
Nu04-49 | Every person in SERVICE*3 | in BEARING |
| | |
COMMENTS |
*1 Note the rich use of language. At least 4 terms are used
CRAFTSMANSHIP, SERVICE, SERVE-SERVICE, BEARING-SERVICE.
Yet as the above list shows there seems to be an emphasis
of TWO TYPES: SERVICE and BEARING. Thus the emphasis in
understanding Rashi should NOT be on attaching nuances to
every word--rather the emphasis should be on attaching
nuances to database justified nuances*10
*2 To BEAR means to CARRY. In fact eg Nu04 clearly mentions
that the Levites task was to carry the disassembled
ark during transport (See Nu04-01:16 or Nu04-21:28).
*3 There are similarly many Biblical chapters mentioning
the service of the levites by Song. eg 1Ch06. See
especially 1Ch06-17 which calls the LEVITE SINGING, SERVICE
We use here the Rashi technique of OTHER VERSES
LONGER FOOTNOTES |
*10 Rashis literal language is
-------------------------------------------------
SERVICE-SERVICE has a nuance of a SERVICE for
ANOTHER service--this then would refer to Levite
singing
-------------------------------------------------
Thus it incorrectly appears that Rashi is DERIVING
the meaning of SERVICE-SERVICE from the above
etymology.
But the correct approach is that
- Rashi derived the meaning from USAGE in other verses
- Rashi THEN (after the fact) justified the etymology
Still another way of looking at this is that Rashi
EXPECTED the student to read Rashi AFTER they
had constructed the above list.
Indeed, if Rashi WANTED us to extract nuances from
every word then why didnt he ALSO explain the
strange word CRAFTSMANSHIP which occurs in Nu04-03.
My opinion however is that because this word
only occurs once and does not have DATABASE
JUSTIFICATION therefore Rashi did not explain it.
| |
RASHI RULE USED: ALIGNMENT
#*#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc., 2002, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#*#*#
VERSE: Nu05-08a
RASHIS COVERED: Nu05-08a Nu05-08b
RASHI FILLS-IN |
VERY BRIEF SUMMARY
------------------
Nu05-06:08 describes a person who stole, feels guilty but
the agrieved has no relatives to return the stolen object to.
The Bible describes a specific atonement procedure. Rashis
task on this chapter is to FILL IN phrases to make the
reading smoother. Rashi identifies the antecedents of
the sentence subjects which continuously change in both
reference and plurality. This helps the reader read the
Biblical paragraph. Rashi also uses the technique of OTHER
VERSES to give a detailed description of how the theft
described could have happened.
----------------------------------------
TODAYS RASHI RULE: GRAMMAR
TODAYS RASHI SUBRULE: FILL-IN
----------------------------------------
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF RULE
-------------------------
Many Rashis focus on the two main concerns of a text:
MEANING and GRAMMAR.
When Rashi focuses on GRAMMAR he might discuss
-- roots and their conjugations
-- subject-predicate/gender agreement
-- constructs, connective prepositions and object designation
-- multi-sentence verses,
-- discuss issues of ellipsis, antecedents, referents etc
The important point to remember in such Rashis is that
Rashi is acting the same way a modern grammar textbook
would act. Very often Rashi can be properly understood
by looking up the above topics in standard textbooks.
STANDARD EXAMPLE
----------------
Perhaps the simplest example of Rashi on grammar is Dt02-16a
There are 6000 Biblical verses. Most of them are complete
sentences. However about 2 dozen of them are part of
multi-verse sentences. Rashi simply alerts the reader to this.
Here is the text of Dt02-16:17
--------------------------------------------------------
Dt02-16 When all the sinners died from the nation
Dt02-17 [Then] God spoke to me (Moses) to say over
--------------------------------------------------------
Rashi in effect inserts the elliptical word [Then] to
smoothen the reading of these sentences. Note that if
one tries to read each verse separately then the
verses appear awkward.
(STUDENT) EXERCISES
-------------------
Most readers of Rashi will actually learn the grammar
from Rashi. However for those who wish to put in a little
more effort it is worth the while to take a modern grammar
book (Any one will do) and look up the given topic in that
grammar book. Then apply the technique to the verse in
question. Such an exercise enriches our understanding
of Rashi.
STANDARD REFERENCES FOR THIS RULE
---------------------------------
http://www.Rashiyomi.com/grammar.htm |
VERSE | BIBLICAL TEXT | Plural? | WHO |
Nu05-06 | When PEOPLE sin | Plural*1 | Thief |
Nu05-06 | and HE descecrates God | Singular | Thief |
Nu05-06 | and HE feels guilty | Singular | Thief |
Nu06-07 | and THEY confess | Plural | Thief |
Nu06-07 | and HE returns the principle | Singular | Thief |
Nu06-07 | and HE adds a fifth | Singular | Thief |
Nu06-07 | & HE returns to the agrieved | Signular | Thief |
Nu06-08 | But If HE has no relatives | Singular | AGRIEVED*2 |
Nu06-08 | to return to theft to HIM | Singular | AGRIEVED |
| | | |
COMMENTS |
*1 I dont know of an explanation for the changing plurality
in the subjects.
*2 Now we understand Rashis point. All the previous words HE
referred to the thief. But in Nu06-08 the word HE refers to
the AGRIEVED (The person stolen from).
How does Rashi know this? From Context and meaning. Nu06-08
talks about RETURNING THE THEFT TO THE PERSON. So
Rashi-is-Simple--clearly this refers to the person stolen
from.*10
In previous postings we have referred to Rashis of this
type as using the FILL-IN rule since Rashi FILLS IN
antecedents of PRONOUNS
LONGER FOOTNOTES |
*10 Rashi now uses the technique of OTHER VERSES. This technique
allows enriching a verse with FURTHER DETAILS from other
verses.
Nu27-06:11 describes the INHERITANCE HIERARCHY.
- 1st: Sons inherit
- 2nd: Daughters inherit
- 3rd: Fathers descendants inherit
If none of the above exists then
- 4th: Grandfathers descendants; Great-Grandfathers
descendants etc.
It consequently follows that every Jew must have some
relative. After all we are all descended from Jacob
so that at the very least we have some descendant
of his close to us.
The only possible exception would be a CONVERT.
Hence Rashi interprets the Biblical phrase
---------------------------------
If the person has no relative
---------------------------------
to mean
--------------------------------
if the person is a convert
--------------------------------
As indicated this uses the technique of OTHER VERSES.
We can go further--why didnt the Bible simply state
---------------------------
If the person is a convert
---------------------------
The answer is
---------------------------------
The Bible used the phrase NO RELATIVE
vs CONVERT to emphasize the total
helplessness of the person--that
he is all alone and someone had
the nerve to steal from him
----------------------------------
| |
RASHI RULE USED: GRAMMAR
#*#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc., 2002, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#*#*#
THE 6 RASHI RULE CLASSES(Version 3.2 Dec 15 2001)
http://www.Rashiyomi.com/rules-01.htm
Copyright Dec 2001, RashiYomi Inc. Dr Hendel President
========================================================
THE DICTIONARY RULE: Rashi can function as a dictionary.
He presents 2-6 meanings of words
REFERENCE: http://www.RashiYomi.Com/words.htm
========================================================
* EXAMPLE 1: AL means ON. AL can also mean
- WITH (Eat Passover WITH matzoh Ex12-09e)
- IN (Place the Matzoh IN the basket Ex29-03)
- TO (The boards shall be even from bottom TO top Ex26-24c)
- NEAR (His borders will be NEAR Tzison Gn49-13b)
- AFTER(Offer Peace offerings AFTER the daily Lv03-05a)
* EXAMPLE 2: KI means IF,PERHAPS,RATHER,BECAUSE,WHEN,THAT
Gn18-15a Gn24-33a
* EXAMPLE 3: YDA means FAMILIAR, not KNOW (eg Dt34-10a)
eg Gn04-01 Adam was FAMILIAR with his wife
* EXAMPLE 4: ON THE FACE OF means DURING THE LIFETIME
Nu03-04a Gn11-28a Ex20-03c Dt05-07a
===========================================================
THE GRAMMAR RULE: Rashi comments on RARE or SIMILAR usages
REFERENCE:http://www.RashiYomi.Com/grammar.htm
===========================================================
* EXAMPLE 1: BA-ah means CAME;ba-AH means COMING(Gn46-26a)
* EXAMPLE 2:THE SENTENCE: 0.2% of Biblical sentences are 2verses
-(Dt11-07:08) It was not your fathers who saw this;rather you
* EXAMPLE 3: Hitpael has different rules if 1st root letter is
Tzade (USE: Ni-Tz-Ta-Dack not Ni-Th-Tza-Dack--Gn44-16a)
================================================================
THE CITATION RULE: Rashi enriches meaning by citing OTHER verses
REFERENCE:http://www.RashiYomi.Com/other-20.htm
================================================================
* EXAMPLE 1: Dt26-05d We went down to Egypt with A FEW PEOPLE
ENRICHED by Gn46-27: We went down with 70 people
* EXAMPLE 2: Lv01-05a Non-priests may SLAUGHTER offerings
This law DERIVED from explicit statement in 2Chr30-17
* EXAMPLE 3:Why does Rashi say that Chur is Miriams son(Ex17-10b)
DERIVED from possible interpretation of 1-Chr18-19
* EXAMPLE 4: Gn35-22a Reuven Slept with Bilhah(Fathers concubine)
Gn49-04 Reuven PLAYED with fathers BEDS
CONCLUSION: Reuven inteferred with fathers personal
life(ruffled bedspreads); Bible condemns Reuven by
exaggeration; he is accused of incest which he didnt do
=================================================================
THE 3 RABBI ISHMAEL RULES: They govern style(broad vs literal)
REFERENCE:http://www.RashiYomi.com/example1.htm thru example9.htm
=================================================================
* EXAMPLE 1: Simple sentences are always GENERALIZED
---------------------------------------
Dt25-04a Dont MUZZLE an OX while it is THRESHING
Rabbi Ishmael: Dont STOP any ANIMAL from eating
while DOING ITS WORK
* EXAMPLE 2: GENERAL-EXAMPLE style always interpreted LITERALLY
--------------------------------------------------
Nu05-12d (GENERAL) If a women DESECRATES her marriage
(EXAMPLE) and commits ADULTERY
Rabbi Ishmael: Nu05 only applies to ADULTERY.
It does not apply to other marriage DESECRATIONS
* EXAMPLE 3: GENERAL-EXAMPLE-GENERAL style intepreted SIMILARLY
--------------------------------------------------
Lv05-21b (GENERAL) If a man DENIES under oath
(EXAMPLE) ..denies a deposit,loan,theft,wages,lost item
(GENERAL) or ANY DENIAL which he denies
RABBI ISHMAEL: These laws apply to any SIMILAR Example
* The law applies to partnerships, movables and monetary objects
* The law does not apply to real-estate or slander
=================================================================
THE CLIMAX RULE: The Bible should be interpreted in such a manner
that it reflects CLIMACTIC development to a goal
REFERENCE: http://www.RashiYomi.Com/example9.htm
=================================================================
EXAMPLE 1: Dt19-11a If a man HATES, SPIES, CONFRONTS & KILLS
RASHI: Bible identifies 4 stages to murder(Capped)
==============================================================
THE FORMATTING PRINCIPLE: Bible had its own method to mimic
bold, bullets, footnotes, paragraphs
==============================================================
* BOLD: Bible REPEATS words to obtain BOLD emphasis effect
http://www.RashiYomi.Com/doubl-14.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------
EXAMPLE 1:(Ex12-09c) COOK COOK it in water (So COOKED is bold)
INFERENCE: Prefered to COOK it in water;
But COOK It at all costs(Even if you dont have water)
* BULLETS: Bible indicates bullets by REPEATING KEYWORDS
--------------------------------------------------------
Who am I
- THAT I should go to Pharaoh
- THAT I should take the Jews out of Egypt (Ex03-11a)
--------------------------------------------------------
RASHI: Repeated word THAT creates BULLET effect
- Pharoh was a difficult king (Bullet one)
- Jews were not yet ready for freedom (Bullet two)
* FOOTNOTES: The Bible indicates FOOTNOTES by ALMOST DUPLICATING
verses but making small minor changes
http://www.RashiYomi.Com/align-58.htm
---------------------------------------------------------------
EXAMPLE: Ex20-03a
VERSE PHRASE #1 PHRASE #2 PHRASE #3
------- --------- --------- ------------------
Ex20-03 Dont POSSESS the gods of others
Ex20-04 Dont MAKE idols
RASHI: So both POSSESSion & MAKING of idols are prohibited
---------------------------------------------------------------
End of Rashi is Simple Digest
|
#*#*#*#*# (C) RashiYomi, 2001 Inc. Dr. Hendel President #*#*#*#*#