Rashi-Is-Simple Mailing List
             VISIT the RASHI DATABASE archives AT
                  http://www.RashiYomi.com/
                  Surfing the Talmudic Seas

               (C) RashiYomi Incorporated, 2002
               Written by Dr Russell Jay Hendel

                     Volume 14 Number 3
          For the WORD QUALITY HTML VERSION click here
               -----------------------------------
               http://www.Rashiyomi.com/h14n3.htm

                     Produced May 22nd, 2002

       WARNING: USE FIX WIDTH FONTS (eg COURIER (NEW) 10)


OVERVIEW OF HILIGHTS IN THIS ISSUE

`          Whats new and hot in this issue?
ITEMWHATS NEW & HOT IN THIS ISSUE
WORKBOOKWe are embarking on a Rashi Workbook Project*1
WHYWhy didnt the Bible simply state it simply?*2
The REAL RSHIWhen Rashi gives a reason is that the Real one?*3
COMMENTS

*1 Over the next year or so we will be writing modules for
   the 2-4 dozen basic Rashi skill competencies needed for
   learning Rashi. These modules will then be gathered into
   a workbook which can be used at home or in schools In
   the meantime each of these modules is usable in actual
   schools or home-schooling situations.

*2 Frequently Rashi will explain on Biblical phrase as meaning
   something else. The question arises: WHY DIDNT THE BIBLE
   SIMPLY SAY SO. We provide an answer

*3 Frequently (on this list) Rashi says one thing but we
   claim the real reason is something else. How then should
   we understand the Rashi. Read below for the answer.



Rashis covered in this issue
VERSERULEBRIEF DESCRIPTION
==============================================================
Ex20-02aDOUBLE PARSHASA dozen commandments mention the Exodus
Dt05-15aDOUBLE PARSHASA dozen commandments mention the Exodus
Dt16-12aDOUBLE PARSHASA dozen commandments mention the Exodus
Dt24-18aDOUBLE PARSHASA dozen commandments mention the Exodus
Lv22-33aDOUBLE PARSHASA dozen commandments mention the Exodus
Lv11-45aDOUBLE PARSHASA dozen commandments mention the Exodus
Nu15-41cDOUBLE PARSHASA dozen commandments mention the Exodus
Ex20-02aDOUBLE PARSHASA dozen commandments mention the Exodus
Ex29-46aDOUBLE PARSHASA dozen commandments mention the Exodus
Lv25-38aDOUBLE PARSHASA dozen commandments mention the Exodus
Lv19-36dDOUBLE PARSHASA dozen commandments mention the Exodus
Nu04-47aALIGNMENTLevites (a) SANG (b) TRANSPORTED Temple
Nu04-47bALIGNMENTLevites (a) SANG (b) TRANSPORTED Temple
Nu05-08aGRAMMARRashi FILLS-IN pronouns
Nu05-08bGRAMMARRashi FILLS-IN pronouns
----------------------------------------------------------------



#*#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc., 2002, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#*#*#

VERSE: Ex20-02a

RASHIS COVERED:  Ex20-02a Dt05-15a  Dt16-12a  Dt24-18a  Lv22-33a
        Lv11-45a Nu15-41c  Ex20-02a  Ex29-46a
        Lv25-38a Lv19-36d

DATABASE METHODS


VERY BRIEF SUMMARY
------------------
There are only a dozen commandments where it mentions
the EXODUS from Egypt--that is, it states DO THESE
COMMANDMENTS AND REMEMBER THAT I, GOD, TOOK YOU OUT
OF EGYPT. There are 4 reasons for mentioning the Exodus:
(1) BE NICE TO SLAVES AND ORPHANS (cf Dt15-15,Dt05-15
Dt16-12, Dt24-18); (2) SANCTIFY YOURSELVES by avoiding ritual
impurity; (cf Lv22-33, Lv11-45, Nu15-41, Ex29-46).(3) AVOID
ANXIETY PRODUCING BUSINESS PRACTICES (Cf Lv25-38, Lv19-36)
(4) SERVE THE TRUE ONE UNIQUE GOD: (cf Ex20-01,Ex29-46)
All these practices were intrinsic to Egypt.

-----------------------------------------
TODAYS RASHI RULE:       DATABASE METHODS
TODAYS RASHI SUBRULE:    DATABASE METHODS
-----------------------------------------

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF RULE
-------------------------
One of Rashis main goals was to function as a Masorite:
A scholar who preserves the accuracy of the Biblical
text.

A primary vehicle for preserving the Biblical text is
noting RARITY. RARITY simply means that in some domain
of knowledge, Biblical language rarely uses certain
words or terms.

Examples of Biblical rarity are (a) Grammatical conjugations
that do not occur that often in Tnach; (b) Special topics
that occur in only a FEW of the Biblical commandments; (c)
grammatical roots that only occur a few times in the Bible.

I have coined the phrase: TO RASHI A TEXT--which means to
especially note all RARITY that occurs in that text. Rashi
will frequently NOT EXPLAIN this RARITY but simply NOTE IT.
As indicated this is the task of the Masorite.

For those who are familiar with Database theory this can
be succinctly formulated (See footnote *10)

STANDARD EXAMPLE
----------------
There are 613 BIblical commandments. But only a dozen
or so mention the Exodus. Hence the EXODUS is a Biblical
Rarity relative to the commandments. The list below shows
the dozen or so verses containing Biblical commandments.
In most of them Rashi comments on the emphasis that
----------------------------------------
God took us out of Egypt (Exodus) on
condition that we perform these commandments
----------------------------------------

STUDENT EXERCISES:
------------------
- Gather/find all Biblical commandments that mention
the Exodus

- How many such commandments do you have?

- Are there common themes to these Biblical commandments

RASHIS SOLUTION
---------------
Rashi did NOT have a solution! Rashi simply notes
the Rarity. In each of the dozen or so commandments
mentioning Egypt he mentions this Rarity.

Nevertheless by seeking underlying themes in these
commandments we enrich our understanding of Rashi

STANDARD REFERENCES FOR THIS RULE
---------------------------------
http://www.RashiYomi.com/database.htm
A definitive scholarly paper on Database methods with
many examples.

Todays example may be found at
http://www.RashiYomi.com/dt05-15a.htm

One can also find this example at the Rashi calendar
See http://www.RashiYomi.Com/egypt-5.htm

Or visit the Rashi calendar at
http://www.RashiYomi.com/calendar1.htm
The Exodus series was presented in August 2000

HOW TO USE THESE LISTS FOR SCHOOL PROJECTS
------------------------------------------
You can use the LISTS referenced above for
school projects. Here is how. If you are a
teacher then you can present rarity themes
and ask the students to perform the
3 student exercises listed above.

The students can then compare their analysis with that
of Rashis. This leads to greater appreciation of Rashi.

TODAYS EXAMPLE
--------------
We present the dozen or so commandments where
the exodus is mentioned. Footnotes elaborate further
VERSECOMMANDWhy this commandment mentions the Exodus
Dt05-15aSlavery*1Remember how you were a slave in Egypt
Dt15-15aSlavery*1Give gifts to your slaves(Like God gave you)
Dt16-12aSlaveryRemember the orphan widow levite etc
Dt24-18aSlaveryRemember the poor and leave food for them
Lv22-33aHoliness*2Be Holy (avoid the impurity methods of Egypt
Lv11-45aHoliness*2Be Holy (avoid the impurity methods of Egypt
Nu15-41cHolinessDo all commandments; Separate from impurity
Ex20-02aOne God*3I am the one God despite various appearances
Ex29-46aOne GOdDwell with ME(God); Not with Egypt
Lv25-38aAnxiety*4Dont take interest on loans
Lv19-36dAnxietyDont have bad weights
COMMENTS

*1 In other words a standard Egyptian practice was CLASS
   DISTINCTIONS. This destroyed initiative and muffled
   individuality. Therefore the Bible especially emphasizes
   Egypt on commandments showing compassion to slaves, poor
   widows and orphans

*2 A classical humiliation technique of Egypt was exposure
   to dead animals, eating blood, visiting graves, idolatry
   etc. This destroyed the personality. The BIble counteracts
   this by emphasizing holiness *11

*3 We could classify this set of commandments with holiness.
   The idea here is that Egypt assigned everyone a PLACE
   based on THEIR god. In Judaism there is one God and all
   are equally accessible to Him

*4 A classic technique of Egypt was use of business anxiety
   measures such as loaning on interest or use of bad
   weights. This destroyed the desire for excellence.
   The overall goal of Egypt was destroying individuality
   and creating a machine of people. Towards this end
   they needed to humiliate people enough to destroy
   their individuality.

LONGER FOOTNOTES

*10 This is a slightly technical footnote for those who know
    SQL the accepted database standard for all
    databases

    ------------------ HENDELS RARITY ALGORITHM -----------------
    Let B=Bible= database with fields  BIblical words,Verses
    Let C=Commandments = Any domain of expertise
    We suppose C enumerates Commandments, Verses of occurence

    Then B x C, the Left Join of B and C contains the fields
    Biblical Words, Verses they occur in, Which commandment it is

    We want to measure how frequently certain words occur in
    certain verses.

    Let W be all words that occur in any Biblical commandment
    The SQL statement is: SELECT distinct w FROM b X c;

    We can now count the number of commandment verses where
    each Biblical word occurs. The SQL statement is

    SELECT w, count(verse) FROM w X b X c WHERE w in W;

    The last Query produces a list of all words that occur
    in Biblical commandments as well as their frequency.

    Certain words like DO NOT occur in hundreds of commandments
    Certain words like REPRODUCE only occur in one or two
    commandments.

    Rashi is not interested in these.

    But certain words like EGYPT, REWARD etc occur in a dozen
    or so commandments. These words and verses are where you
    will find Rashis.

    In the above algorithm certain extra intermediate steps
    may eg produce tighter distinctnesses. We omit details
    Similarly certain steps may be combined with subqueries.

    Note the extreme elegance of the Hendel algorithm With
    only 5 lines of compact code we have succinctly
    described several 100 Rashis.

    Praise be Him who Chose Them and Their Learning
    ------------------------------------------------------------

*11 A beautiful comment by the University of Rabbi Ishmael
    occurs on this verse which further illustrates the
    database method.

    Rabbi Ishmaels school points out that among the dozen
    rare commandments that mention Egypt all use the term
    I AM GOD THAT took YOU OUT OF EGYPT.

    Lv11-45a however uses the expression, I AM GOD
    WHO elevated YOU FROM EGYPT. Thus there is emphasis
    on ELEVATION from impurity to Holiness.


RASHI RULE USED: DOUBLE PARSHAS

#*#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc., 2002, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#*#*#

VERSE: Nu04-47a

RASHIS COVERED: Nu04-47a Nu04-47b

LEVITES SING/BEAR


VERY BRIEF SUMMARY
------------------
The Bible describes the task of the levites using various words
such as CRAFTSMANSHIP, SERVICE, BEARING. An alignment of about
a dozen verses where these terms occur shows special emphasis
on two types of tasks: SERVICE/BEARING. By referring to other
Biblical verses we see that the Levites performed two primary
tasks-- SINGING ACCOMPANIMENT TO SACRIFICES and TRANSPORT-
BEARING OF THE TEMPLE on trips.Logically, it seems satisfactory
to connect BEARING=TRANSPORT; SERVICE=SINGING. The emphasis in
our approach is not on etymologies but rather on seeking other
verses supporting nuances.

----------------------------------------
TODAYS RASHI RULE:       ALIGNMENT
TODAYS RASHI SUBRULE:    FURTHER NUANCES
----------------------------------------

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF RULE
-------------------------
Many Rashis do NOT focus on an internal analysis of the verse.
There may be nothing bothering Rashi in THAT verse. The words
used may all be normal.

But when the given verse is compared with another verse--that
is, when the two verses are ALIGNED together-- we see blatant
differences.

The ALIGNED verses therefore suggest that these ALIGNED
DIFFERENCES were deliberately placed there to emphasize
certain nuances. The standard example will illustrtae this.


STANDARD EXAMPLE
----------------
Recall that the Moabite King BALAK was apprehensive about
Israel journeying throught its territory. It wanted Israel
banished. It hired a professional curse-man, Bilam who would
curse the Jews. Bilam however describes his job SLIGHTLY
differently. Here are the verses.

-----------------------------------------------
BALAK: Nu22-06 I will banish Jews FROM THE LAND
BILAM: Nu22-11 ...... banish Jews -------------
-----------------------------------------------


EXERCISE
--------
To fully appreciate Rashi perform the following 2 exercises
- What is the minor difference between the aligned verses?
- What NUANCE do YOU think this implies?


RASHIS SOLUTION
---------------
BALAK only wanted Jews away from his land; his goals were
political. By contrast, BILAM wanted them DESTROYED. Hence...

BALAK wanted Jews BANISHED FROM THE LAND. But Bilam wanted
them BANISHED PERIOD (That is destroyed).


STANDARD REFERENCES FOR THIS RULE
---------------------------------
http://www.Rashiyomi.com/align-58.htm

This summary may be a bit too terse. You can browse the
57 postings leading up to by going to
http://www.Rashiyomi.com/align-1.htm
http://www.Rashiyomi.com/align-2.htm etc.

Or you can visit the Rashi Yomi Calendar at

http://www.RashiYomi.com/calendar1.htm

This calendar presents a day by day listing of Rashis.
The ALIGNMENT series occurs between 7-28-01 and 10-10-01.


HOW TO USE THESE LISTS FOR SCHOOL PROJECTS
------------------------------------------
You can use the LISTS referenced above for
school projects. Here is how. If you are a
teacher then you can present the two aligned
verses and ask the students to perform the
following exercises

-- What are the minor differences between the verses
-- What nuances do they imply

The students can then compare their analysis with that
of Rashis. This leads to greater appreciation of Rashi.

TODAYS EXAMPLE
--------------
Here is the list of verses of Levite service. Further
support is found in the footnotes. Other approaches to
Rashi are mentioned in the longer footnotes.
VERSEINITIAL LANGUAGE USEDSECOND LANGUAGE USED
Nu04-03Those who do CRAFTSMANSHIP*1
Nu04-23Those who SERVE SERVICE*1
Nu04-24to SERVE*1TO BEAR*1 *2
Nu04-30to SERVE SERVICE
Nu04-35for SERVICE
Nu04-39for SERVICE
Nu04-47to serve SERVICE-SERVICEand BEARING-SERVICE
Nu04-49Every person in SERVICE*3in BEARING
COMMENTS

*1 Note the rich use of language. At least 4 terms are used
   CRAFTSMANSHIP, SERVICE, SERVE-SERVICE, BEARING-SERVICE.
   Yet as the above list shows there seems to be an emphasis
   of TWO TYPES: SERVICE and BEARING. Thus the emphasis in
   understanding Rashi should NOT be on attaching nuances to
   every word--rather the emphasis should be on attaching
   nuances to database justified nuances*10

*2 To BEAR means to CARRY. In fact eg Nu04 clearly mentions
   that the Levites task was to carry the disassembled
   ark during transport (See Nu04-01:16 or Nu04-21:28).

*3 There are similarly many Biblical chapters mentioning
   the service of the levites by Song. eg 1Ch06. See
   especially 1Ch06-17 which calls the LEVITE SINGING, SERVICE
   We use here the Rashi technique of OTHER VERSES

LONGER FOOTNOTES

*10 Rashis literal language is
    -------------------------------------------------
    SERVICE-SERVICE has a nuance of a SERVICE for
    ANOTHER service--this then would refer to Levite
    singing
    -------------------------------------------------

    Thus it incorrectly appears that Rashi is DERIVING
    the meaning of SERVICE-SERVICE from the above
    etymology.

    But the correct approach is that
    - Rashi derived the meaning from USAGE in other verses
    - Rashi THEN (after the fact) justified the etymology

    Still another way of looking at this is that Rashi
    EXPECTED the student to read Rashi AFTER they
    had constructed the above list.

    Indeed, if Rashi WANTED us to extract nuances from
    every word then why didnt he ALSO explain the
    strange word CRAFTSMANSHIP which occurs in Nu04-03.

    My opinion however is that because this word
    only occurs once and does not have DATABASE
    JUSTIFICATION therefore Rashi did not explain it.


RASHI RULE USED: ALIGNMENT

#*#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc., 2002, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#*#*#

VERSE: Nu05-08a

RASHIS COVERED: Nu05-08a Nu05-08b

RASHI FILLS-IN


VERY BRIEF SUMMARY
------------------
Nu05-06:08 describes a person who stole, feels guilty but
the agrieved has no relatives to return the stolen object to.
The Bible describes a specific atonement procedure. Rashis
task on this chapter is to FILL IN phrases to make the
reading smoother. Rashi identifies the antecedents of
the sentence subjects which continuously change in both
reference and plurality. This helps the reader read the
Biblical paragraph. Rashi also uses the technique of OTHER
VERSES to give a detailed description of how the theft
described could have happened.

----------------------------------------
TODAYS RASHI RULE:       GRAMMAR
TODAYS RASHI SUBRULE:    FILL-IN
----------------------------------------

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF RULE
-------------------------
Many Rashis focus on the two main concerns of a text:
MEANING and GRAMMAR.

When Rashi focuses on GRAMMAR he might discuss
-- roots and their conjugations
-- subject-predicate/gender agreement
-- constructs, connective prepositions and object designation
-- multi-sentence verses,
-- discuss issues of ellipsis, antecedents, referents etc

The important point to remember in such Rashis is that
Rashi is acting the same way a modern grammar textbook
would act. Very often Rashi can be properly understood
by looking up the above topics in standard textbooks.

STANDARD EXAMPLE
----------------
Perhaps the simplest example of Rashi on grammar is Dt02-16a
There are 6000 Biblical verses. Most of them are complete
sentences. However about 2 dozen of them are part of
multi-verse sentences. Rashi simply alerts the reader to this.
Here is the text of Dt02-16:17

--------------------------------------------------------
Dt02-16 When all the sinners died from the nation
Dt02-17 [Then] God spoke to me (Moses) to say over
--------------------------------------------------------

Rashi in effect inserts the elliptical word [Then] to
smoothen the reading of these sentences. Note that if
one tries to read each verse separately then the
verses appear awkward.

(STUDENT) EXERCISES
-------------------
Most readers of Rashi will actually learn the grammar
from Rashi. However for those who wish to put in a little
more effort it is worth the while to take a modern grammar
book (Any one will do) and look up the given topic in that
grammar book. Then apply the technique to the verse in
question. Such an exercise enriches our understanding
of Rashi.

STANDARD REFERENCES FOR THIS RULE
---------------------------------
http://www.Rashiyomi.com/grammar.htm
VERSEBIBLICAL TEXTPlural?WHO
Nu05-06When PEOPLE sinPlural*1Thief
Nu05-06and HE descecrates GodSingularThief
Nu05-06and HE feels guiltySingularThief
Nu06-07and THEY confessPluralThief
Nu06-07and HE returns the principleSingularThief
Nu06-07and HE adds a fifthSingularThief
Nu06-07& HE returns to the agrievedSignularThief
Nu06-08But If HE has no relativesSingularAGRIEVED*2
Nu06-08to return to theft to HIMSingularAGRIEVED
COMMENTS

*1 I dont know of an explanation for the changing plurality
   in the subjects.

*2 Now we understand Rashis point. All the previous words HE
   referred to the thief. But in Nu06-08 the word HE refers to
   the AGRIEVED (The person stolen from).

   How does Rashi know this? From Context and meaning. Nu06-08
   talks about RETURNING THE THEFT TO THE PERSON. So
   Rashi-is-Simple--clearly this refers to the person stolen
   from.*10

   In previous postings we have referred to Rashis of this
   type as using the FILL-IN rule since Rashi FILLS IN
   antecedents of PRONOUNS

LONGER FOOTNOTES

*10 Rashi now uses the technique of OTHER VERSES. This technique
    allows enriching a verse with FURTHER DETAILS from other
    verses.

    Nu27-06:11 describes the INHERITANCE HIERARCHY.
    - 1st: Sons inherit
    - 2nd: Daughters inherit
    - 3rd: Fathers descendants inherit
    If none of the above exists then
    - 4th: Grandfathers descendants; Great-Grandfathers
      descendants etc.

    It consequently follows that every Jew must have some
    relative. After all we are all descended from Jacob
    so that at the very least we have some descendant
    of his close to us.

    The only possible exception would be a CONVERT.

    Hence Rashi interprets the Biblical phrase
    ---------------------------------
    If the person has no relative
    ---------------------------------

    to mean
    --------------------------------
    if the person is a convert
    --------------------------------

    As indicated this uses the technique of OTHER VERSES.

    We can go further--why didnt the Bible simply state
    ---------------------------
    If the person is a convert
    ---------------------------

    The answer is
    ---------------------------------
    The Bible used the phrase NO RELATIVE
    vs CONVERT to emphasize the total
    helplessness of the person--that
    he is all alone and someone had
    the nerve to steal from him
    ----------------------------------




RASHI RULE USED: GRAMMAR


#*#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc., 2002, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#*#*#


          THE 6 RASHI RULE CLASSES(Version 3.2 Dec 15 2001)
                http://www.Rashiyomi.com/rules-01.htm
          Copyright Dec 2001, RashiYomi Inc. Dr Hendel President

========================================================
THE DICTIONARY RULE: Rashi can function as a dictionary.
                     He presents 2-6 meanings of words
         REFERENCE: http://www.RashiYomi.Com/words.htm
========================================================
* EXAMPLE 1: AL means ON. AL can also mean
      - WITH (Eat Passover WITH matzoh Ex12-09e)
      - IN   (Place the Matzoh IN the basket Ex29-03)
      - TO   (The boards shall be even from bottom TO top Ex26-24c)
      - NEAR (His borders will be NEAR Tzison Gn49-13b)
      - AFTER(Offer Peace offerings AFTER the daily Lv03-05a)

* EXAMPLE 2: KI means IF,PERHAPS,RATHER,BECAUSE,WHEN,THAT
   Gn18-15a Gn24-33a

* EXAMPLE 3: YDA means FAMILIAR, not KNOW (eg Dt34-10a)
	   eg Gn04-01 Adam was FAMILIAR with his wife

* EXAMPLE 4: ON THE FACE OF means DURING THE LIFETIME
            Nu03-04a Gn11-28a Ex20-03c Dt05-07a

===========================================================
THE GRAMMAR RULE: Rashi comments on RARE or SIMILAR usages
        REFERENCE:http://www.RashiYomi.Com/grammar.htm
===========================================================

* EXAMPLE 1: BA-ah means CAME;ba-AH means COMING(Gn46-26a)


* EXAMPLE 2:THE SENTENCE: 0.2% of Biblical sentences are 2verses
 -(Dt11-07:08) It was not your fathers who saw this;rather you

* EXAMPLE 3: Hitpael has different rules if 1st root letter is
   Tzade (USE: Ni-Tz-Ta-Dack not Ni-Th-Tza-Dack--Gn44-16a)

================================================================
THE CITATION RULE: Rashi enriches meaning by citing OTHER verses
         REFERENCE:http://www.RashiYomi.Com/other-20.htm
================================================================
* EXAMPLE 1: Dt26-05d We went down to Egypt with A FEW PEOPLE
	    ENRICHED by Gn46-27: We went down with 70 people

* EXAMPLE 2: Lv01-05a Non-priests may SLAUGHTER offerings
	    This law DERIVED from explicit statement in 2Chr30-17

* EXAMPLE 3:Why does Rashi say that Chur is Miriams son(Ex17-10b)
	    DERIVED from possible interpretation of 1-Chr18-19

* EXAMPLE 4: Gn35-22a Reuven Slept with Bilhah(Fathers concubine)
	    Gn49-04  Reuven PLAYED with fathers BEDS
        CONCLUSION: Reuven inteferred with fathers personal
	life(ruffled bedspreads); Bible condemns Reuven by
	exaggeration; he is accused of incest which he didnt do

=================================================================
THE 3 RABBI ISHMAEL RULES: They govern style(broad vs literal)
REFERENCE:http://www.RashiYomi.com/example1.htm thru example9.htm
=================================================================

* EXAMPLE 1: Simple sentences are always GENERALIZED
            ---------------------------------------
	    Dt25-04a Dont MUZZLE an OX while it is THRESHING
	    Rabbi Ishmael: Dont STOP any ANIMAL from eating
			   while DOING ITS WORK
					
* EXAMPLE 2: GENERAL-EXAMPLE style always interpreted LITERALLY
            --------------------------------------------------
 Nu05-12d (GENERAL) If a women DESECRATES her marriage
	   (EXAMPLE) and commits ADULTERY
	   Rabbi Ishmael: Nu05 only applies to ADULTERY.
	   It does not apply to other marriage DESECRATIONS
			
* EXAMPLE 3: GENERAL-EXAMPLE-GENERAL style intepreted SIMILARLY
            --------------------------------------------------
 Lv05-21b (GENERAL) If a man DENIES under oath
	  (EXAMPLE) ..denies a deposit,loan,theft,wages,lost item
	  (GENERAL) or ANY DENIAL which he denies
 RABBI ISHMAEL: These laws apply to any SIMILAR Example
 * The law applies to partnerships, movables and monetary objects
 * The law does not apply to real-estate or slander

=================================================================
THE CLIMAX RULE: The Bible should be interpreted in such a manner
                that it reflects CLIMACTIC development to a goal
             REFERENCE: http://www.RashiYomi.Com/example9.htm
=================================================================
 EXAMPLE 1: Dt19-11a If a man HATES, SPIES, CONFRONTS & KILLS
 RASHI: Bible identifies 4 stages to murder(Capped)

==============================================================
THE FORMATTING PRINCIPLE: Bible had its own method to mimic
                          bold, bullets, footnotes, paragraphs
==============================================================

* BOLD: Bible REPEATS words to obtain BOLD emphasis effect
          http://www.RashiYomi.Com/doubl-14.htm
  --------------------------------------------------------------
  EXAMPLE 1:(Ex12-09c) COOK COOK it in water (So COOKED is bold)
  INFERENCE: Prefered to COOK it in water;
         But COOK It at all costs(Even if you dont have water)

* BULLETS: Bible indicates bullets by REPEATING KEYWORDS
  --------------------------------------------------------
 Who am I
 - THAT I should go to Pharaoh
 - THAT I should take the Jews out of Egypt (Ex03-11a)
 --------------------------------------------------------
 RASHI: Repeated word THAT creates BULLET effect
 - Pharoh was a difficult king (Bullet one)
 - Jews were not yet ready for freedom (Bullet two)

* FOOTNOTES: The Bible indicates FOOTNOTES by ALMOST DUPLICATING
	     verses but making small minor changes
                http://www.RashiYomi.Com/align-58.htm
  ---------------------------------------------------------------
  EXAMPLE: Ex20-03a
  VERSE        PHRASE #1       PHRASE #2       PHRASE #3
  -------      ---------       ---------       ------------------
  Ex20-03      Dont            POSSESS  the gods of others
  Ex20-04      Dont            MAKE     idols

  RASHI: So both POSSESSion & MAKING of idols are prohibited
  ---------------------------------------------------------------

                           End of Rashi is Simple Digest
#*#*#*#*# (C) RashiYomi, 2001 Inc. Dr. Hendel President #*#*#*#*#