#*#*#*#  (C) 2000-2006, RashiYomi Inc. Dr Hendel President #*#*#*#
  -----------------------------------------------------------
  |      Rashi is Simple Version 2.0                         |
  |      (C) RashiYomi Inc., Dr Hendel President,2006        |
  |       http://www.RashiYomi.Com                           |
  | PERMISSION to reprint WITH this header if NOT for profit |
  ------------------------------------------------------------


VERSE: Nu10-28a

RASHIS COVERED: Nu10-28a Nu10-28b Nu10-34b Nu10-12a

======================== Nu10-28a ============================

SUCCINCT SUMMARY
----------------
Rashi frequently makes powerful inferences from
 - the ALIGNMENT,
 - that is, the word by word comparison,
of almost identical  verses.The minor variations
between these almost similar  verses suggests nuances
and differences or even meaning. We
call this the Rashi rule of ALIGNMENT

-When Rashi identifies two cases from the ALIGNMENT we call
this the Rashi subrule of TWO CASES

-When Rashi infers nuances from the variations between the
almost similar verses (or verse phrases) we call this the
Rashi subrule of NUANCES.

-When Rashi infers MEANING from the ALIGNMENT of almost
identical phrases we call this the Rashi SUBRULE of MEANING.

EXAMPLE 1: Nu10-28a Nu10-28b
---------------------------------------------
Reference to JOURNEYS has 3 distinct meanings
in the following verses
-------------------------------------------------------------
- (Nu10-28) These are the [ORDER of the] JOURNEYS of the Jews
-           And they [Actually] JOURNEYED
- (Nu33-01) These are the [ACTUAL]JOURNEYS of the Jews
-------------------------------------------------------------

Rashi (Paraphrased) explains:
----------------------------------------------------
The same word JOURNEYS
- means the JOURNEY SEQUENCE in Nu10-28
- means the ACTURAL JOURNEYS in Nu33-01
Biblical chapter Nu33-01 describes the actual journeys
of the Jewish people. Biblical chapter Nu10-28 describes
the order in which the individual tribes journeyed.

The word JOURNEYED vs JOURNEY is a verb---it indicates
that an ACTUAL JOURNEY took place at this time.
-----------------------------------------------------

LIST309w summarizes this METONOMY.

In translating JOURNEY as the SEQUENCE OF JOURNEYS
Rashi was using the METONOMY principle. Let us
review the METONOMY principle

SUCCINCT SUMMARY
----------------
One of Rashi's 10 major methods is the WORD MEANING
method. One WORD MEANING method is the METONOMY
method. METONOMY is the naming of an item by a
RELATED item. For example AMERICA defeated IRAQ
really means the AMERICAN PEOPLE defeated the
IRAQY PEOPLE. Here the LAND America names the
related item, the PEOPLE that reside in AMERICA.

EXAMPLE Nu10-28a
----------------
As just seen the word JOURNEYS in
Nu10-28a refers to the JOURNEY SEQUENCE.
This ia an example of METONOMY.

EXAMPLE Nu10-12a
----------------
Since the above ALIGNMENT shows us that
    - JOURNEYS= JOURNEY SEQUENCES in Nu10, hence
    - JOURNEYS=JOURNEY SEQUENCE in Nu10-12a
    ----------------------------------------
    The Jews journeyed by THEIR JOURNEY SEQUENCE
    from SINAI....to PARAN
    ----------------------------------------

    Here Rashi transfers the meaning inferred from
    the ALIGNMENT to the rest of the chapter in which
    the ALIGNMENT occurs.

    This also follows the METONOMY principle.

EXAMPLE Nu10-34b
----------------
Verse Nu10-34 states
-------------------------
And the CLOUD OF GOD [Prophecy]
was on them when they journeyed
from THEIR CAMP
-------------------------

Rashi interprets THEIR CAMP, metonomycally
Rashi suggests the verse be translated as
follows
---------------------------------
And the CLOUD OF GOD [Prophecy]
was on them when they journeyed
from THEIR CAMPINGS
---------------------------------

Here CAMP metonomyically refers to
their CAMPING STATES.

LIST871m summarizes this and similar
examples of METONOMY.
===================================================================
ITEM                     DETAIL
======================== ==========================================
RASHI RULE CLASS:        ALIGNMENT
RASHI SUBRULE CLASS      NUANCES
RASHI WORKBOOK PRINCIPLE #11
SEE BELOW                LIST309w
LIST OF                  identical phrases;different meanings(JRNY)
----------------------   ---------------------------------------
RASHI RULE CLASS:        WORD MEANINGS
RASHI SUBRULE CLASS      8 METHODS OF NAMING
RASHI WORKBOOK PRINCIPLE #7
SEE BELOW                LIST871m
List of                  words which mean related items-METONOMY
==================================================================

========================== LIST309w ==============================
LIST OF identical phrases;different meanings(JRNY)
==================================================================
VERSE    TEXT OF VERSE---WORD journey IS CAPPED
======== =========================================================
Nu10-28a These are the [ORDER of the] JOURNEYS*1 of the Jews
Nu10-28b And they [Actually] JOURNEYED*2
Nu33-01  These are the [ACTUAL]JOURNEYS*1 of the Jews

NOTES
-----
*1 - Nu10 talks about the SEQUENCE of tribes IF Journeying*10
   - Nu33 talks about the ACTUAL JOURNEYS

*2 The VERB form is used indicating an ACTUAL Journey
   The other verses use a NOUN FORM

------------------------------- LONGER FOOTNOTES ---------------

*10 Since the above ALIGNMENT shows us that
    - JOURNEYS= JOURNEY SEQUENCES in Nu10, hence
    - JOURNEYS=JOURNEY SEQUENCE in Nu10-12a
    ----------------------------------------
    The Jews journeyed by THEIR JOURNEY SEQUENCE
    from SINAI....to PARAN
    ----------------------------------------

    Here Rashi transfers the meaning inferred from
    the ALIGNMENT to the rest of the chapter in which
    the ALIGNMENT occurs.

==================================================================

======================= LIST871m =================================
List of words which mean related items-METONOMY*10
==================================================================
VERSE    BIBLICAL PHRASE         TRANSLATION           NOTES
======== ======================= ===================== ===========
Lv26-13c Redeem you STANDING     PROUDLY
Lv26-13b break the STICK of yoke break LATCH of yoke
Lv27-03a YOUR-VALUE              Fee Schedule
Lv27-03b YOUR-VALUE              Fee-Schedule
Lv27-08c what his HAND can GRAB  what he can AFFORD
Gn49-26d BREASTS                 Ejaculation
Gn49-26c EJACTULATION and WOMBS  Many happy children
Gn30-35c sheep with WHITE        WHITE PATCHES
Ex30-07b FLAMES of candellabrah  OIL PANS hold flames
Ex27-20a CLEAR OIL               OIL without dregs     *4
Gn30-39a aroused by STICKS       REFLECTION OF STICKS  *11
Ex14-07c FIRST-SECOND-THIRD      PRES-VicePres-Secrtry
Ex22-02b He has BLOOD            Guilty of BLOODSHED
Nu35-27a He doesnt have BLOOD    Not a MURDERER
-------- ----------------------- --------------------- ------------
Dt01-16d court case with GRANARY GRANARY-tenant worker *14
Lv27-02b vow SOUL                vow VALUE OF SOUL
Nu10-28b These are the JOURNEYS  ...JOURNEY SEQUENCES
Nu10-12a Journey BY JOURNEY      BY JOURNEY SEQUENCE
Nu10-34b from their CAMP         From their CAMPINGS
Gn23-04b PLOT OF GRAVE           Burial Plot           *12
Dt25-09a Spit IN FACE            Spit TOWARDS HIM      *1
Lv05-04a Swear by lips           Verbally(Explicitly)  *2
Ex28-08a Belt OF his AYPHOD      Belt USED with AYPHOD *3
Ex28-31a the dress OF AYPHD      Aypohd USED with DRES *3

NOTES
-----
*1 Cf However Lv15-08a Spit ON Him = Actually spit on him
   The rule seems to be that SPIT ON HIM is literal
   whereas SPIT ON FACE (use of FACE vs FULL PERSON) means
   SPIT TOWARDS HIM

*2 eg If I am angry and mentally curse or if I
   am angry and start ranting and raving without
   however fully articulating everything on my mind
   -- in these two cases I may have sworn IN MY MIND
   but I have not sworn WITH MY LIPS (Explicitly)

*3 Contrast Ex20-03a OTHER GODS=GODS OF OTHER PEOPLE
   vs Ex21-02a JEWISH SLAVE = SLAVE AND JEWISH

   Technically the possessive --OF-- can mean
   - OWNED BY (eg OTHER GODS = gODS of OTHERS)
   - PROPERTY (eg JEWISH SLAVE=SLAVE who is JEWISH)
   - ASSOCIATED WITH (eg BELT OF GARMENT=Belt USED
   with Garment)

   Note Rashi proves the JEWISH SLAVE=SLAVE WHO
   IS JEWISH by citing an other verse Dt15-12 *11

*4 Rashis real point here ('What is bothering Rashi') is
   that the METONOMY rule requires that CLEAR OIL could
   either mean
   - literally clear oil
   - oil producing a clear flame
   Rashi advises us that here it is literal
   Rashi also cites the Talmud Menachoth which
   outlines the production process


*5 So
   - VALUE = FEE
   - YOUR-VALUE = FEE SCHEDULE(Fixed amount for each
     gender and age group)*13

-------------------- LONGER FOOTNOTES ----------------

*10 The difference between this list; LIST871m and
    the sister list, LIST871d, of IDIOMS BY METONOMY
    is that
    - LIST871d lists new phrases that have entered
      the language as idioms--for example, HOLY COINS
      refers to COINS USED/RELATED TO THE HOLY TEMPLE

    - LIST871m lists one time usages of metonomy--
      for example SHEEP WITH WHITE refers to
      SHEEP WITH WHITE PATCHES.

    The difference is that HOLY COINS always refer
    to TEMPLE-RELATED coins while WHITE does not
    always refer to WHITE PATCHES---in other words
    it is a one time use of the RELATED MEANING rule.

    The metonomy of most of the examples in this list
    can be inferred from context.

*11 It is important to emphasize that SHEEP do NOT get
    aroused from merely seeing something patched (which
    reminds them of sheep of the opposite gender).

    Rather JACOB FIXED the STICKS IN THE WATER.

    The water in the troughs was FLOWING water. Hence the
    reflection of the sticks in the water gave the appearance
    of MOVING / PULSATING ITEMS WITH PATCHES.

    It is these MOVING / PULSATING items with patches
    that aroused the female sheep since the pulsating
    bobbing sticks resembled aroused males. Once the females
    became aroused the males mated them.

    So Jacobs trick was to mimic LIVE MALE PATCHED SHEEP
    by using water reflections of PATCHED STICKS.

*12 The Hebrew word A-Chu-Zah by itself can refer to
    a plot of land (without any additional words):
    ------------------------------------------------------
    Cf Gn47-11 Gave them a PLOT
    Cf Lv25-46 These slaves shall be a PLOT for inheritance
    Cf Nu27-04 Give us please a PLOT among our brothers
    ------------------------------------------------------

*13 Rashi admits that
    -----------------------------------------------------
    I don't understand (know of a precedent) for the
    peculiar grammatical construction: YOUR-VALUE
    -----------------------------------------------------

    Rashi was NOT stating that he did not know what
    YOUR-VALUE vs VALUE means. In fact he says explicitly
    -------------------------------------------------
    the value was fixed for each gender and age group
    -------------------------------------------------

    Rather what Rashi did not know was a precedent
    for the peculiar grammatical form: YOUR-VALUE

*14 As usual in this list we have brought Rashi's SECOND
    explanation (Whenever there are two explanations in
    Rashi, we reject the first as wrong and accept the
    second as right). I am told that the Lubavitcher Rebbe
    may he rest in peace held a different view: There are
    problems with each explanation and Rashi therefore brought
    both.

    We have very slightly modified Rashi to make his
    comment consistent with Biblical Hebrew. Rashi actually states
    --------------------------------------------------
    Judge even minor cases like LANDLORD vs TENANT
    --------------------------------------------------

    We have modified this as follows
    -----------------------------------------------
    Judge even minor cases like LANDLORD vs
    FARMER-TENANT
    -----------------------------------------------

    PEOPLE and their PLACES often have same names
    (e.g. AMERICA-AMERICAN) The FARMER TENANT is
    the person ASSOCIATED with
    the GRANARY which in Hebrew is Gimel Resh. It
    is for this reason that we have slightly amended
    Rashi.

    The literal Rashi, TENANT would not make sense
    linguistically since Gimel-Resh refers to an ALIEN
    not to a TENANT. On the other hand, Gimel-Resh
    as meaning GRANARY is common in the Bible.

==========================================================================
---------------------------------------------------
WARNING: The following additional references may be too wordy
However they frequently contain additional information & lists
The hyperlinks only work on the main website

Volume 30 Number 2


#*#*#*#  (C) 2000-2006, RashiYomi Inc. Dr Hendel President #*#*#*#
Volume 30 Number 2