#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*# (C) Dr Hendel, 2000 *#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*
-----------------------------------------------------------
| Rashi is Simple Version 2.0 |
| (C) Dr Hendel, Summer 2000 |
| http://www.RashiYomi.Com |
| PERMISSION to reprint WITH this header if NOT for profit |
------------------------------------------------------------
VERSE: Nu29-26a
>Verse: Nu29-26a "And the holiday of FIRST FRUITS"
>RASHI: The holiday of FIRST FRUITS refers to SHAVUOTH
It is so called because of the DUAL-BREAD offering
that is offered on that holiday(Lv23-15:22) which
is the first offering of the new harvest
Rashi appears to derive the meaning of FIRST-FRUIT holiday
from the DUAL BREAD offering. Actually this is not the case.
Rashi derives the meaning of the FIRST-FRUIT holiday from
the correspondence of the two {LISTS} of holidays in Leviticus
and Numbers. They are as follows
{LIST} {Holidays in Leviticus and Numbers. The correspondence
shows that "1stFruit" holiday is Shavuoth. Technically
this type of double list is called an INNER JOIN since
the {LISTS} are lined up based on a common field}
LEVITICUS NUMBERS
HOLIDAY VERSE HOLIDAY VERSE
---------- ------- ------- -------
Passover Lv23-04 Passover Nu28-16
Shavuoth Lv23-15 1stFruit Nu28-26 ####
New Year Lv23-23 NewYear Nu29-01
Yom Kippur Lv23-26 YomKippur Nu29-07
Succoth Lv23-33 Succoth Nu29-12
Thus we clearly see that "1st Fruit holiday" corresponds
to Shavuoth.
In conclusion Rashi did not derive the meaning of 1st fruit
holiday from a play on words---rather Rashi derived the
meaning of 1st fruit holiday from the above correspondence.
AFTER Rashi derived the meaning of the term Rashi THEN
proceeded to explain WHY 1st fruit holiday was so called
COMMENT
-------
Note that our approach uses {LISTS} and is superior to
the "What is Rashis question" approach. For the "What is
bothering Rashi" approach would undoubtedly point out that
eg FIRST FRUITS were ALSO brought on PASSOVER (cf Dt26-01:11)
and therefore "1stFRUIT" holiday could equally refer to
PASSOVER or SHAVUOTH. One then spends time trying to figure
out a la Rashi why it refers to Shavuoth vs Succoth.
However our approach is simple and straightforward--Rashi
does not have to have a problem. Rather Rashi has to have
a list. The {LIST} in a straightforward manner suggests
a correspondence and it is this correspondence which
creates meaning. After the meaning is established Rashi
tries to justify it. This is the proper approach
---------------------------------------------------
WARNING: The following additional references may be too wordy
However they frequently contain additional information & lists
The hyperlinks only work on the main website
Volume 6 Number 24
#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*# (C) Dr Hendel, 2000 *#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*
Volume 6 Number 24