Rashi-Is-Simple Mailing List
VISIT the RASHI DATABASE archives AT
http://www.RashiYomi.com/
Surfing the Talmudic Seas
(C) RashiYomi Incorporated, 2002
Written by Dr Russell Jay Hendel
Volume 15 Number 23
For the WORD QUALITY HTML VERSION click here
-----------------------------------
http://www.Rashiyomi.com/h15n23.htm
Produced Oct 30th, 2002
WARNING: USE FIX WIDTH FONTS (eg COURIER (NEW) 10)
OVERVIEW OF HILIGHTS IN THIS ISSUE |
Whats new and hot in this issue? |
ITEM | WHATS NEW & HOT IN THIS ISSUE |
WORKBOOK | A workbook with all Rashi skill competencies*1 |
GPG style | GENERAL PARTICULAR GENERAL style helps a Rashi |
Rashi amended | PEACHY Amendation of Rashi based on list*2 |
| |
COMMENTS |
*1 Over the next year or so we will be writing modules for
the 2-4 dozen basic Rashi skill competencies needed for
learning Rashi. These modules will then be gathered into
a workbook which can be used at home or in schools In
the meantime each of these modules is usable in actual
schools or home-schooling situations.
*2 Rashi (following Chazal) says GVA refers only to righteous
people. But it DOES refer to wicked people. The proper
statement is that GVA (DEATH) when applied to an individual
only applies to a RIGHTEOUS person.
Several other postings in todays digest illustrate subtle
Rashi emendations based on skillful use of lists.
|
Rashis covered in this issue |
|
VERSE | RULE | BRIEF DESCRIPTION |
======== | =============== | ======================================== |
Gn28-10c | GRAMMARr | The AYIM ending refers to pairs(hands... |
Ex34-06c | GRAMMARr | The AYIM ending refers to pairs(hands... |
Nu14-18a | GRAMMARr | The AYIM ending refers to pairs(hands... |
Gn42-06a | GRAMMARr | The AYIM ending refers to pairs(hands... |
Gn01-08a | GRAMMARr | The AYIM ending refers to pairs(hands... |
Ex34-06a | GRAMMARr | The AYIM ending refers to pairs(hands... |
Gn25-17b | SYNONYMS | GVA only used by individual if Righteous |
Gn25-18a | ALIGNMENT | Arabs more respected while Ishmael alive |
Gn24-29a | EXAMPLE7 | GENERAL-DETAIL-GENERAL:Laban wants money |
--------- | ---------------- | ---------------------------------------- |
#*#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc., 2002, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#*#*#
VERSE: Gn28-10c
RASHIS COVERED: Gn28-10c Ex34-06c Nu14-18a
Gn42-06a Gn01-08a Ex34-06a
AYIM refers to PAIRS |
VERY BRIEF SUMMARY
------------------
One of Rashis tasks is to explain Grammar the same way modern
Grammar textbooks explain grammar. Grammar deals with a variety
of issues including a) verb conjugation, b) sentence structure,
c) plurality, d) special word forms. In this posting Rashi
explains that the AYIM ending refers to objects that
intrinsically come in pairs: Such as
- hands (YaDAYIM) - Feet (RagLAYIM) -Hands (CapAYIM)
- Eyes (AyNAYIM) - Breasts (ShadAYIM) -
We can infer new meanings such as NAHARAYIM (A city between 2
rivers) or SHAMAYIM=a place of multiple THERE(see footnote *10)
--------------------------------------------------------------
TODAYS RASHI RULE GRAMMARr
TODAYS RASHI SUBRULE SPECIAL ENDINGS
--------------------------------------------------------------
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF RASHI RULE AND SUBRULE
-------------------------------------------
One of Rashis tasks is to explain Grammar the same way modern
Grammar textbooks explain grammar. Grammar deals with a variety
of issues including a) verb conjugation, b) sentence structure,
c) plurality, d) special word forms. In this posting Rashi
explains that the AYIM ending refers to objects that
intrinsically come in pairs: Such as YADAYIM = hands
STANDARD REFERENCE FOR TODAYS RULE
----------------------------------
The RashiYomi grammar page: http://www.Rashiyomi.com/grammar.htm
TODAYS LIST
-----------
We review several examples of Hebrew words for items that are
intrinsically paired (like hands). We then (in the lower half
of the list) review new meanings based on this concept of
pairing. |
VERSE | WORD | MEANING |
-------- | YadAYIM | Hands |
-------- | raglAYIM | Feet |
-------- | capAYIM | Hands |
-------- | shadAYIM | Breasts |
-------- | AynAYIM | Eyes |
-------- | --------- | --------------------------------------------- |
Gn28-10c | NAHARAYIM | A city between a PAIR of RIVERS |
Gn42-06c | APAYIM*10 | BOWING (both NOSTRILS touch ground evenly)*1 |
Gn01-08a | SHAMAYIM | HEAVEN-A Place of MULTIPLE THERE*2 |
| | |
COMMENTS |
*1 AF refers to the nose. So APAYIM would refer to the
two nostrils. It therefore metaphorically refers to
complete prostration and bowing.
When you prostrate yourself COMPLETELY on the ground
(vs just bending at the waist) you use your hands and
knees to completely prostrate yourself till your nose
touches the ground--hence both nostrils (APAYIM) touch
the ground (If you dont use your hands your nose wouldnt
reach the ground evenly since the weight would crush it)
*2 The word HEAVEN can refer to
- the lower atmosphere where the clouds and rain form
- the higher heaven where the moon, sun and stars reside
Hence HEAVEN refers to a PAIR of THEREs
LONGER FOOTNOTES |
*10 Rashi on Nu14-18a SEEMS to explain that
----------------------------------------------------
The phrase LONG SUFFERING (APAYIM) refers to a pair
- God is long suffering to the righteous
- God is long suffering to the wicked
----------------------------------------------------
However APAYIM refers to the two nostrils. We therefore
think that the Rashi in Nu14-18a was NOT derived from
the AYIM ending but rather is linked to the Rashi on
Ex34-06a
----------------------------------------------------
Why does the Biblical text use a repeated word GOD
in the verse Ex34-06
--- GOD GOD A MERCIFUL AND GRACE BEARING GOD?
Because as we have explained in our series on
repeated words (See http://www.RashiYomi.com/doubl-14.htm)
REPEATED WORDS can broaden meaning.
- God is not only Kind to RIGHTEOUS people who sin
- God is also kind to WICKED people who sin
-----------------------------------------------------
In other words the Rashi statement that God is merciful
to both the wicked and righteous is
- NOT derived from the AYIM ending which denotes pairs
- BUT RATHER IS derived from the REPEATED word GOD GOD
found in the sister verse Ex34-06 (from which Moses
cited in Nu14-18)
This seems to be the simplest method of understanding
this Rashi.
| |
RASHI RULE USED: GRAMMARr
#*#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc., 2002, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#*#*#
VERSE: Gn25-17b
GVA=DEATH OF RIGHTEOUS |
VERY BRIEF SUMMARY
------------------
There are a variety of words in Hebrew which mean DEATH. One
of these words is the Hebrew root Gimel-Vav-Ayin. Rashi states
that this root is only used with regard to the death of Righteous
people (& Hence since Ishmaels death is described using the word
Gimel-Vav-Ayin it follows that Ishmael is righteous). The list
below presents all occurences of the Root Gimel-Vav-Ayin in the
Bible. As can easily be seen many of these occurences deal with
the death of wicked people. However Rashi can easily be amended:
- When Gimel-Vav-Ayin refers to the death of a SINGLE person
then it will only be used if that person is Righteous.*10
------------------------------------------------------
TODAYS RASHI RULE: WORD MEANINGS
TODAYS RASHI SUBRULE: SYNONYMS
------------------------------------------------------
BRIED DESCRIPTION OF RULE and SUBRULE
-------------------------------------
One of Rashis 6 main goals was to function like a dictionary
and present the meanings of words. In presenting the meanings
of words, Rashi, could
- explain the meaning of an unknown term
- explain the meaning of an unknown phrase
- unify the disparate meanings of a root
- clarify the nuances of competing synonyms
STANDARD REFERENCES FOR TODAYS RASHI RULE
------------------------------------------
The RashiYomi dictionary: http://www.RashiYomi.com/words.htm
The 6 Rashi rules: http://www.RashiYomi.com/rules-01.htm
TODAYS EXAMPLE
--------------
We present the list of all verses using the Hebrew root
Gimel-Vav-Ayin. Note how GVA can occur by the death of
wicked people. However when GVA refers to the death of
a single individual (2nd half of list)then it always refers
to the death of righteous people |
VERSE | WHOM IT REFERS TO | INDIVIDUAL | WICKED |
Gn06-17 | Whole world | No | Yes |
Gn07-21 | Whole world | No | Yes |
Nu17-27 | Korachs rebellion | No | Yes |
Nu20-03 | Rebellion of spies | No | Yes |
Jo22-20 | Acan didnt DIE alone | No*1 | Maybe |
Za13-08 | 2/3 of Jews die | No | Maybe |
P104-29 | Sea-life dies | No | No |
Jb34-15 | all flesh will die | No | No |
La01-19 | Priests etc die | No | Righteous |
------- | -------------------- | -------------------- | -------------- |
Nu20-29 | Aaron | Yes | Righteous |
Gn25-08 | Abraham | Yes | Righteous |
Gn35-29 | Isaac | Yes | Righteous |
Gn49-33 | Jacob | Yes | Righteous |
Gn25-17 | Ishmael | Yes | Righteous |
Jb03-11 | Job | Yes | Righteous |
| | | |
COMMENTS |
*1 This verse is difficult since it seems to refer to the
death of a wicked individual. However all the commentaries
interpret this verse as follows
------------------------------------------------------
Achan did not DIE (GVA) ALONE for his sin [but rather
large parts of the community also died]
------------------------------------------------------
Thus the root GVA in the verse really refers to the
death of the a community
LONGER FOOTNOTES |
*10 Hence this Rashi is a peachy example of Rashi amendation:
- Rashi states: GVA ONLY refers to Righteous people
- But after examining the above list we conclude tha
the real rule is that GVA, WHEN REFERRING TO AN INDIVIDUAL
only refers to righteous people
| |
RASHI RULE USED: SYNONYMS
#*#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc., 2002, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#*#*#
VERSE: Gn25-18a
Arab Respect |
VERY BRIEF SUMMARY
------------------
In Gn16-12 God promises that Ishmael (The Arab people) will be
NOMADIC--they will DWELL all over the place. But in Gn25-18 the
phraseology abruptly changes: We are told that the Arabs DROP
IN all over the place. Gn25-18 was stated after the death of
both Abraham and Ishmael*10. The less respectful term DROP IN
seems to imply that while Abraham & Ishmael lived,Arabs DWELT
(respectfully among everybody); but after Abraham & Ishmaels
death Arabs were less respected (They DROPPED IN vs DWELT)
----------------------------------
TODAYS RASHI RULE: ALIGNMENT
TODAYS RASHI SUBRULE: TWO CASES
----------------------------------
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF RULE
-------------------------
Many Rashis do NOT focus on an internal analysis of the verse.
There may be nothing bothering Rashi in THAT verse. The words
used may all be normal.
But when the given verse is compared with another verse--that
is, when the two verses are ALIGNED together-- we see blatant
differences.
The ALIGNED verses therefore suggest that these ALIGNED
DIFFERENCES were deliberately placed there to emphasize
certain nuances.
A nifty way of explaining the ALIGNED verses is to think
of ALIGNMENT as the vehicle that the Biblical Author uses
to indicate FOOTNOTES. That is, a modern writer might use
FOOTNOTES to indicate details; the Biblical Author instead
used REPEATED ALIGNED VERSES with DIFFERENT DETAILS.
The simplest case of ALIGNMENT is when the differences
CLEARLY and EXPLICITLY show that we are dealing with
two cases each with different details. The STANDARD
example below from the 10 commandments illustrates this
STANDARD EXAMPLE
----------------
Perhaps the simplest example of an alignment revealing
two cases and two laws occurs in the 10 commandments.
Ex01-02:03 states
----------------------------------------------
Ex20-02 you shall NOT HAVE the gods of others
Ex20-03 you shall NOT MAKE idols
----------------------------------------------
STUDENT EXERCISES:
------------------
-- What is the SAME in the ALIGNED verses
-- What is DIFFERENT in the ALIGNED verses
-- State the 2 CASES you infer from the aligned differences
RASHIS SOLUTION
---------------
- Both verses begin YOU SHALL NOT. In other words
they are negative prohibitions.
- One verse prohibits HAVING idols while the 2nd verse
prohibits MAKING idols
- THere are 2 separate idolatry prohibitions: MANUFACTURE
(even if you dont keep them) and OWNERSHIP/POSSESION
(even if you dont make them)
STANDARD REFERENCES FOR THIS RULE
---------------------------------
http://www.Rashiyomi.com/align-58.htm
This summary may be a bit too terse. You can browse the
57 postings leading up to by going to
http://www.Rashiyomi.com/align-1.htm
http://www.Rashiyomi.com/align-2.htm etc.
Or you can visit the Rashi Yomi Calendar at
http://www.RashiYomi.com/calendar1.htm
This calendar presents a day by day listing of Rashis.
The ALIGNMENT series occurs between 7-28-01 and 10-10-01.
HOW TO USE THESE LISTS FOR SCHOOL PROJECTS
------------------------------------------
You can use the LISTS referenced above for
school projects. Here is how. If you are a
teacher then you can present the two aligned
verses and ask the students to perform the
3 student exercises listed above.
The students can then compare their analysis with that
of Rashis. This leads to greater appreciation of Rashi.
TODAYS EXAMPLE
--------------
We bring 3 verses showing how Arabs are nomadic (and dwell
all over the place). The first verse was mentioned during the
lifetime of Abraham and Ishmael and uses he RESPECTFUL term
DWELLING all over the place. The 3rd verse spoken after the
death of both Abraham and Ishmael*10 uses the lest respectful
term DROPPED IN all over the place (denoting NOMADNESS). The
2nd verse seems to show that there were always two types of
Arabs (those that commanded respect and dwelt and those that
DROPPED IN all over the place) |
VERSE | PHRASE1 | PHRASE2 | PHRASE3 |
Gn16-12 | He will | DWELL | on all his brothers |
Gn25-18a | They | DWELT | from CHAVILA to SHUR...near Syria... |
Gn25-18 | HE | DROPPED IN | on all his brothers |
Differs | *1 | *2 | *3 |
| | | |
COMMENTS |
*1 Unlike our tradtional alignments we have here not 2
contrasting verses but rather 3 contrasting verses:
Note the difference between the 2nd row vs the 1st-3rd
row: The 2nd row is stated in the plural. This contrasting
plural hilights the singular used in the 1st and 3rd row--
for now the ONLY difference between the first and 3rd row
is that one uses the phrase DWELL while the other uses the
phrase DROPPED IN. See footnotes #2 #3 for further details
Why then is the 2nd row stated?
First note that it gives details to the concept that the
Arabs dwell ALL OVER THE PLACE--in fact the Arabs dwelt
from CHAVILA to SHUR...to SYRIA
Second there is a hint here that there are RESPECTED and
NON-RESPECTED Arabs since even after Ishmaels death some
Arabs DWELT everywhere (RESPECTFUL) while others DROPPED
IN everywhere (NOT RESPECTFUL).
*2 The first two rows use the respectful term DWELL while the
3rd row (Spoken after the death of both Abraham and Ishmael)
uses the lest respectful term DROPPED IN*11. This implies that
after Abraham and Ishmael died Arabs were treated with less
respect (They couldnt just DWELL; rather they had to DROP IN)
*3 The first and 3rd rows are IDENTICAL except that one uses
the word DWELL while the other uses the word DROPPED IN*11
The only difference between these verses is that the first
verse was spoken during the lifetime of Abraham and Ishmael
while the 2nd verse was spoken after the lifetime of
Abraham and Ishael.
LONGER FOOTNOTES |
*10 Interestingly Rashi states
------------------------------------------------
After Abrahams death the Arabs were less respected
-------------------------------------------------
But in fact Gn25-18 occurs in a chapter that mentions
Ishmaels death. Thus it is reasonable to amend Rashi to
reflect both Abrahams and Ishmaels death
-------------------------------------------------------
After the death of BOTH Abraham and Ishmael the Arabs
were treated with less respect
-------------------------------------------------------
*11 The Hebrew root used is Nun-Pay-Lamed which literally
means to FALL.
Rashi cites a verse, Ju07-12, showing that this Hebrew root
Nun-Pay-Lamed can also mean to DWELL/LIVE
For our purposes however I think it better to use the
comparable phrase in English: DROP IN. Just as the English
word DROP (which means to FALL) can also mean to LIVE (DROP
IN) so too the Hebrew root Nun-Pay-Lamed can have this
double usage.
Note how citing the English DROP IN emphasizes Rashis point
that Arabs were less respected after Abraham/Ishmaels death
The technique used here--citing Analogies from English--
follows the methods of my article PSHAT & DERASH (TRADITION
WINTER 1980) which emphasizes COMPARABLE EXAMPLES FROM
OTHER CULTURES.
| |
RASHI RULE USED: ALIGNMENT
#*#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc., 2002, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#*#*#
VERSE: Gn24-29a
Laban-Money |
VERY BRIEF SUMMARY
------------------
Recall that the Bible is discussing how Eliezer, Abrahams servant
gave Rivka jewelry gifts (Since he wanted her to marry Abrahams
son, Isaac). Rivka ran to tell her house. Laban, Rivkas brother
also ran out to meet Eliezer. Gn24-28:30 describing Labans meeting
Eliezer is written in a GENERAL-DETAIL-GENERAL style
-- Rivka RAN to her house
-- GENERAL Laban RAN to Eliezer
-- DETAIL -------------------- When he saw the Jewelry gifts
-- GENERAL Laban CAME to Eliezer
The GENERAL-DETAIL-GENERAL style shows Laban only wanted money
------------------------------------------------------
TODAYS RASHI RULE: THE RABBI ISHMAEL STYLE RULES
TODAYS RASHI SUBRULE: GENERAL-DETAIL-GENERAL STYLE
------------------------------------------------------
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF RULE
-------------------------
Some Rashis deal with GRAMMAR or MEANING. But other Rashis
deal with STYLE. The Great Talmudic Sage Rabbi Ishmael,
laid down 3 style rule classes which divide into a dozen
or so rules.
Today we deal with the DETAIL-GENERAL or
GENERAL-DETAIL-GENERAL style. In this style the verse
first states something specifically and then repeats
the requirement generally.
The Rabbi Ishmael Style rules then demand that the
specific details be partially generalized. This requirement
of generalization is not because of grammar or meaning or
even because some word in the verse is extra: Rather, it
is a requirement of style.
STANDARD EXAMPLE
----------------
The simplest example I could find occurs at Ex25-31.
-----------------------------------------------------------
DETAIL-SPECIFIC: Make a Candellabrah of PURE GOLD
GENERAL: Sculptored shall you make the Candellabrah
-----------------------------------------------------------
STUDENT EXERCISES:
-----------------
-- Can you restate the verse in a simple style without
the SPECIFIC-GENERAL form?
-- How would you apply the Rabbi Ishmael requirement
of partial generalization to the detail in this verse
RASHIS SOLUTION
---------------
(NOTE: This example occurs in the Talmud but is not
brought down by Rashi).
There are at least two ways to state the verse without
the SPECIFIC-GENERAL style:
-- Make a Golden Menorah that is sculptored with all parts
coming from it.
-- Make a menorah that is sculptored with all parts coming
from it.
Both the above sentences are simple. By contrast the Bible
used a 2-sentence approach with one sentence being SPECIFIC
and the other being GENERAL
--- Make a Golden Menorah
--- Make a ------ Menorah Sculptored with all parts coming
from it.
In other words the Bible deliberately used a STYLE of
stating the idea in 2 verses.
The Talmud then explains how the SPECIFIC DETAIL, GOLD,
is PARTIALLY GENERALIZED: The Menorah can be made of
anything SIMILAR TO GOLD--that is ANY METAL. *10 *11
STANDARD REFERENCES FOR THIS RULE
---------------------------------
http://www.Rashiyomi.com/example7.htm
You can also revu the whole Rabbi Ishmael style
series at http://www.RashiYomi.com/ishmael.htm
Finally you can visit the Daily Rashi calendar at
http://www.RashiYomi.com/calendar1.htm The Rabbi Ishmael
series occured during August and September 2000.
HOW TO USE THESE LISTS FOR SCHOOL PROJECTS
------------------------------------------
You can use the LISTS referenced above for
school projects. Here is how. If you are a
teacher then you can present the verses with
the general-specific-general style
and ask the students to perform the
2 student exercises listed above.
The students can then compare their analysis with that
of Rashis. This leads to greater appreciation of Rashi.
TODAYS EXAMPLE
--------------
We show the GENERAL-DETAIL-GENERAL style of Gn24-28:30
This style shows that the only reason for LABAN RUNNING/COMING
to Eliezer was because of the Jewelry gifts |
VERSE | GENERAL | DETAIL |
Gn24-28 | Rivka RAN to her house*1 | |
Gn24-29 | LABAN RAN to the person | |
Gn24-30 | ------------------------ | When he saw the jewelery gifts |
Gn24-30 | HE*2 CAME to the person | |
| | |
COMMENTS |
*1 The first row in this table (Rivka RAN to her house) is
unnecessary. But I brought it to show that Rashi is NOT
deriving his inference from the fact that LABAN RAN WHEN
HE SAW THE JEWELRY. In fact Rivkah also RAN when she
received the Jewelry.
Rather the inference of Rashi comes from the
GENERAL-DETAIL-GENERAL style which shows that the
- GENERAL THEME: Laban RAN/WALKED to Eliezer
- DETAILS: Was caused primarily by his seeing the gifts
*2 Note the change of verbs: Laban RAN vs Laban CAME
I dont know the significance of this (It is not needed for
the derivation)
|
RASHI RULE USED: EXAMPLE7
#*#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc., 2002, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#*#*#
THE 6 RASHI RULE CLASSES(Version 3.2 Dec 15 2001)
http://www.Rashiyomi.com/rules-01.htm
Copyright Dec 2001, RashiYomi Inc. Dr Hendel President
========================================================
THE DICTIONARY RULE: Rashi can function as a dictionary.
He presents 2-6 meanings of words
REFERENCE: http://www.RashiYomi.Com/words.htm
========================================================
* EXAMPLE 1: AL means ON. AL can also mean
- WITH (Eat Passover WITH matzoh Ex12-09e)
- IN (Place the Matzoh IN the basket Ex29-03)
- TO (The boards shall be even from bottom TO top Ex26-24c)
- NEAR (His borders will be NEAR Tzison Gn49-13b)
- AFTER(Offer Peace offerings AFTER the daily Lv03-05a)
* EXAMPLE 2: KI means IF,PERHAPS,RATHER,BECAUSE,WHEN,THAT
Gn18-15a Gn24-33a
* EXAMPLE 3: YDA means FAMILIAR, not KNOW (eg Dt34-10a)
eg Gn04-01 Adam was FAMILIAR with his wife
* EXAMPLE 4: ON THE FACE OF means DURING THE LIFETIME
Nu03-04a Gn11-28a Ex20-03c Dt05-07a
===========================================================
THE GRAMMAR RULE: Rashi comments on RARE or SIMILAR usages
REFERENCE:http://www.RashiYomi.Com/grammar.htm
===========================================================
* EXAMPLE 1: BA-ah means CAME;ba-AH means COMING(Gn46-26a)
* EXAMPLE 2:THE SENTENCE: 0.2% of Biblical sentences are 2verses
-(Dt11-07:08) It was not your fathers who saw this;rather you
* EXAMPLE 3: Hitpael has different rules if 1st root letter is
Tzade (USE: Ni-Tz-Ta-Dack not Ni-Th-Tza-Dack--Gn44-16a)
================================================================
THE CITATION RULE: Rashi enriches meaning by citing OTHER verses
REFERENCE:http://www.RashiYomi.Com/other-20.htm
================================================================
* EXAMPLE 1: Dt26-05d We went down to Egypt with A FEW PEOPLE
ENRICHED by Gn46-27: We went down with 70 people
* EXAMPLE 2: Lv01-05a Non-priests may SLAUGHTER offerings
This law DERIVED from explicit statement in 2Chr30-17
* EXAMPLE 3:Why does Rashi say that Chur is Miriams son(Ex17-10b)
DERIVED from possible interpretation of 1-Chr18-19
* EXAMPLE 4: Gn35-22a Reuven Slept with Bilhah(Fathers concubine)
Gn49-04 Reuven PLAYED with fathers BEDS
CONCLUSION: Reuven inteferred with fathers personal
life(ruffled bedspreads); Bible condemns Reuven by
exaggeration; he is accused of incest which he didnt do
=================================================================
THE 3 RABBI ISHMAEL RULES: They govern style(broad vs literal)
REFERENCE:http://www.RashiYomi.com/example1.htm thru example9.htm
=================================================================
* EXAMPLE 1: Simple sentences are always GENERALIZED
---------------------------------------
Dt25-04a Dont MUZZLE an OX while it is THRESHING
Rabbi Ishmael: Dont STOP any ANIMAL from eating
while DOING ITS WORK
* EXAMPLE 2: GENERAL-EXAMPLE style always interpreted LITERALLY
--------------------------------------------------
Nu05-12d (GENERAL) If a women DESECRATES her marriage
(EXAMPLE) and commits ADULTERY
Rabbi Ishmael: Nu05 only applies to ADULTERY.
It does not apply to other marriage DESECRATIONS
* EXAMPLE 3: GENERAL-EXAMPLE-GENERAL style intepreted SIMILARLY
--------------------------------------------------
Lv05-21b (GENERAL) If a man DENIES under oath
(EXAMPLE) ..denies a deposit,loan,theft,wages,lost item
(GENERAL) or ANY DENIAL which he denies
RABBI ISHMAEL: These laws apply to any SIMILAR Example
* The law applies to partnerships, movables and monetary objects
* The law does not apply to real-estate or slander
=================================================================
THE CLIMAX RULE: The Bible should be interpreted in such a manner
that it reflects CLIMACTIC development to a goal
REFERENCE: http://www.RashiYomi.Com/example9.htm
=================================================================
EXAMPLE 1: Dt19-11a If a man HATES, SPIES, CONFRONTS & KILLS
RASHI: Bible identifies 4 stages to murder(Capped)
==============================================================
THE FORMATTING PRINCIPLE: Bible had its own method to mimic
bold, bullets, footnotes, paragraphs
==============================================================
* BOLD: Bible REPEATS words to obtain BOLD emphasis effect
http://www.RashiYomi.Com/doubl-14.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------
EXAMPLE 1:(Ex12-09c) COOK COOK it in water (So COOKED is bold)
INFERENCE: Prefered to COOK it in water;
But COOK It at all costs(Even if you dont have water)
* BULLETS: Bible indicates bullets by REPEATING KEYWORDS
--------------------------------------------------------
Who am I
- THAT I should go to Pharaoh
- THAT I should take the Jews out of Egypt (Ex03-11a)
--------------------------------------------------------
RASHI: Repeated word THAT creates BULLET effect
- Pharoh was a difficult king (Bullet one)
- Jews were not yet ready for freedom (Bullet two)
* FOOTNOTES: The Bible indicates FOOTNOTES by ALMOST DUPLICATING
verses but making small minor changes
http://www.RashiYomi.Com/align-58.htm
---------------------------------------------------------------
EXAMPLE: Ex20-03a
VERSE PHRASE #1 PHRASE #2 PHRASE #3
------- --------- --------- ------------------
Ex20-03 Dont POSSESS the gods of others
Ex20-04 Dont MAKE idols
RASHI: So both POSSESSion & MAKING of idols are prohibited
---------------------------------------------------------------
End of Rashi is Simple Digest
|
#*#*#*#*# (C) RashiYomi, 2001 Inc. Dr. Hendel President #*#*#*#*#